Backcheck
Recap · SEA at PHI

Flyers pull away from the Kraken

The Flyers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJun 16, 3:14 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
SEA
Seattle Kraken
2
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.85Expected goals2.89
50% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)27
5High-danger chances5
47Corsi (all attempts)47
Score-adjusted: 55% / 45%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Philadelphia won 5–2, but the expected-goals metric — 2.89 to 2.85 — said it was a coin flip.

The Flyers' edge was narrow in volume: 54% shot attempts (27–23 on goal). Their margin in chance quality was narrower still. High-danger chances tied at five apiece. Yet PHI won by three goals. That gap came from execution — both elite and catastrophic.

D. Vladar (PHI) was perfect where it mattered: 100% save rate on five high-danger shots. He finished 21/23 overall (+0.85 vs expected). J. Daccord (SEA) stopped none of his five HD chances and finished 16/21 (-2.75 vs expected). The gap between them accounts for most of the scoreboard surplus.

P. Grubauer (SEA) did not help his team's cause. He stopped all six shots he faced, netting +0.64 vs expected. On another night, that dominance matters. He barely played.

The Flyers' finishing was ruthless. They converted 2 of 5 high-danger chances (40%) and scored five goals from 23 rush attempts. The Kraken managed none of their five HD chances and two from 26 rush tries. PHI also dominated special teams: 2 power-play goals on 5 shots (0.69 xG).

C. York (PHI) finished with 3 assists over 21:49. S. Couturier (PHI) added 2 assists in 18:56. O. Tippett (PHI) scored 2 goals in 16:41, including a wrist shot from a sharp angle in the second period.

PHI overperformed their xG by 2.11 goals — a sign of elite finishing or favorable bounces. SEA underperformed by 0.85.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
SEA0 / 5 · 1.13 xG
PHI2 / 5 · 1.24 xG
Medium dangermid-range
SEA2 / 15 · 1.35 xG
PHI2 / 12 · 1.25 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
SEA0 / 27 · 0.36 xG
PHI1 / 30 · 0.41 xG

SEA went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.13 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
SEA
2 G · 2.85 xG · -0.8
PHI
5 G · 2.89 xG · +2.1
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
P. GrubauerSEA
+0.6
J. DaccordSEA
-2.7
D. VladarPHI
+0.8

SEA finished -0.8 against expected, PHI +2.1 — J. Daccord (SEA) allowed 2.7 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
SEA
WRIST1/21
SNAP0/3
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED1/1
OTHER0/11
PHI
WRIST3/19
SNAP1/8
SLAP0/5
TIP IN1/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/11
SEA
PHI
Off the rush
2 G on 26 · 2.09 xG
5 G on 23 · 2.45 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.07 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.09 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: SEA went 1-for-21, PHI 3-for-19. PHI scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. York
#8 · D · PHI
0 G · 3 A · 0 SOG · 21:49 TOI
S. Couturier
#14 · C · PHI
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 18:56 TOI · +2
O. Tippett
#74 · R · PHI
2 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 16:41 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Daccord (SEA) gave up 2.7 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • PHI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • SEA couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • SEA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • PHI outperformed their expected goals by 2.1 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • P. Grubauer (SEA) saved 2.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • D. Vladar was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
  • PHI power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 5 PP shots (0.69 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · SEA at PHI · 7:00 PM ET

The Flyers are the model's lean over the Kraken on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJun 16, 3:11 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

56%
PHI
Model favorite
44%
56%
SEA50PHI

PHI by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score SEA 2.22.5 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

SEA← edge
edge →PHI
46.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
45.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.13xGF / 602.26
2.51xGA / 602.20
1.87Goals for / gm1.96
1.95Goals against / gm1.82
1.011PDO — luck, not skill1.008

PHI holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.011 vs 1.008) says SEA has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a SEA 2.2–2.5 PHI game with PHI at 56% win probability. Philadelphia dominates the underlying shot metrics: 51.0% 5v5 xG to 46.0%, 48.0% Corsi to 45.0%. But form cuts differently. Seattle has punched above its depth in recent play, going 5-2-3 over their last 10. Philadelphia sits -5 on goal differential in the same span, underwater despite controlling the shot-volume game.

The structural advantage stays with Philadelphia. The underlying efficiency edge—that 5-point xG margin—tracks through Dvorak and Tippett's play. Christian Dvorak runs a 12G 21A line with a sharp 11.2% shooting percentage at 0.81 xG/60. Owen Tippett (0.88 xG/60, 19G 18A) stands as a dominant force when in the lineup, though the Flyers will face Seattle without him Saturday—undisclosed injury, day-to-day.

Seattle counters with Jacob Melanson and Ben Meyers. Melanson operates at 0.88 xG/60 (2G 3A) on a 6.1% shooting rate. Meyers contributes 7G 8A at 0.82 xG/60 but runs a 12.1% shooting percentage, suggesting outperformance relative to his volume.

Both teams carry weak defensive anchors—Chandler Stephenson for Seattle, Dvorak for Philadelphia—though Dvorak's two-way impact softens that liability.

Players to Watch

Seattle: Jacob Melanson (0.88 xG/60, 2G 3A), Ben Meyers (0.82 xG/60, 7G 8A)

Philadelphia: Christian Dvorak (0.81 xG/60, 12G 21A), Owen Tippett (0.88 xG/60, 19G 18A) — day-to-day

Three Things to Watch

  • Philadelphia's xG edge projects as its largest structural advantage.
  • Seattle's recent form suggests the underlying efficiency gap may not fully translate.
  • Tippett's status becomes decisive for the Flyers' expected outcome.
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

SEA
Jacob Melanson2G 3A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.1% sh
Ben Meyers7G 8A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 12.1% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters