Backcheck
Recap · LAK at DAL

Kings steal one from the Stars against the run of play

The Kings stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.49–3.94 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 12:54 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
3
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.49Expected goals3.94
61% share for the better side
25Shot attempts (SOG)31
4High-danger chances9
48Corsi (all attempts)58
Score-adjusted: 44% / 56%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Los Angeles Kings won 3–2 in overtime. Dallas controlled the game by every underlying metric and lost anyway.

The Stars owned 61% of expected goals at 5v5, outshooting the Kings 31–25 and generating 9 high-danger chances to 4. The xG finished 3.94–2.49—a split that said Dallas was better. D. Kuemper disagreed. The Kings' goaltender saved 1.94 goals above expectation while J. Oettinger gave back 0.51. Dallas generated the sharper looks—0.068 xG per shot versus 0.052—and squandered them.

The Stars' power play was dominant: 2 goals on 11 shots (1.07 xG). The Kings' rush attack was lethal: 2 goals from 21 chances. Dallas crashed the net effectively, generating 5 rebound opportunities but converting only 1. Adrian Kempe's snap shot from the high slot at 00:37 of overtime wrote the ending.

The Stars underperformed their xG by 1.94 goals. That margin separates a convincing Dallas victory from a Kings heist.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
LAK0 / 4 · 1.08 xG
DAL1 / 9 · 2.31 xG
Medium dangermid-range
LAK3 / 8 · 0.90 xG
DAL0 / 11 · 1.18 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
LAK0 / 36 · 0.51 xG
DAL1 / 38 · 0.46 xG

LAK went 3-for-8 from medium danger on 0.90 expected goals — 2.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
LAK
3 G · 2.49 xG · +0.5
DAL
2 G · 3.94 xG · -1.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. KuemperLAK
+1.9
J. OettingerDAL
-0.5

LAK finished +0.5 against expected, DAL -1.9 — D. Kuemper (LAK) saved 1.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
LAK
SNAP2/25
WRIST0/4
SLAP1/5
BACKHAND0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
TIP IN0/0
OTHER0/14
DAL
SNAP2/29
WRIST0/5
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND0/4
WRAP AROUND0/1
TIP IN0/1
OTHER0/17
LAK
DAL
Off the rush
2 G on 21 · 1.63 xG
1 G on 26 · 2.58 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.26 xG
1 G on 5 · 1.09 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: LAK went 2-for-25, DAL 2-for-29. LAK scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
W. Johnston
#53 · C · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 24:11 TOI · -1
Q. Byfield
#55 · R · LAK
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 20:32 TOI · +1
R. Hintz
#24 · C · DAL
0 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 20:10 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • LAK stole this one. DAL owned 61% of the xG and lost.
  • D. Kuemper (LAK) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • DAL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.068 xG/shot vs 0.052. Quality over quantity.
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • DAL created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DAL underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Kuemper (LAK) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • DAL power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 11 PP shots (1.07 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · LAK at DAL · 9:00 PM ET

Kings at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 12:53 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
DAL
Model favorite
49%
51%
LAK50DAL

DAL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score LAK 2.42.4 DAL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

LAK← edge
edge →DAL
52.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
52.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.42xGF / 602.36
2.20xGA / 602.29
1.85Goals for / gm2.07
1.71Goals against / gm1.68
1.002PDO — luck, not skill1.024

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The models hate this one. Los Angeles and Dallas both project to 2.4 goals at 5v5—as close to a pick'em as you'll find—giving Dallas a marginal 51% edge. What you're looking at is genuine indifference.

Recent form complicates the Kings' case. LAK sits -5 on goal differential over their last 10, a red flag until you check the underlying numbers. At 5v5, the Kings control play decisively: 52.0% Corsi, 52.0% xG%. Dallas counters with 51.0% xG% and 47.0% Corsi, a territory battle won by LA. The gap is modest but real—the Kings should be winning net shots, and recent slop suggests roster execution, not structural weakness.

Dallas runs hot, and heat cools. The Stars carry a 1.024 PDO to LAK's 1.002—a gap that favors Dallas. Regression is the house edge, not the underdog's hope.

Both goaltenders face back-to-backs. J. Oettinger and D. Kuemper could split starters, start tired, or both pull through fresh. Uncertainty here tilts the game toward chaos.

The skill gap narrows to a few key creators. Jason Robertson (0.96 xG/60, 25G 21A) remains Dallas's most lethal threat—the kind of player who punishes territorial dominance. Alex Laferriere (0.87 xG/60, 16G 18A) is LAK's closest answer: he converts at 9.9%, above league rate, and has potted two high-danger goals, proof the Kings generate premium chances. Michael Bunting (0.83 xG/60, 8G 14A at 7.6%) operates Dallas's secondary line; Jared Wright (0.83 xG/60, 0G 4A) has the play-generating chops but not the finishing for LA—a concern if the Kings need secondary scoring.

The defensive seams matter. Adrian Kempe becomes an exposure point for Dallas; Tyler Myers faces the same scrutiny from LA's forecheck.

Corsi says LAK should win. PDO says Dallas stays lucky. Back-to-backs offer no clarity. This game is exactly what the model promises: a coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters