Backcheck
Recap · OTT at WSH

Senators run the Capitals off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Senators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 1:09 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
OTT
Ottawa Senators
7
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.47Expected goals2.05
69% share for the better side
34Shot attempts (SOG)13
8High-danger chances4
57Corsi (all attempts)54
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Senators demolished the Capitals 7-1. The underlying numbers did not dissent—Ottawa controlled 69% of 5v5 xG (4.47–2.05) through superior shot quality: 0.078 expected goals per shot versus Washington's 0.038.

This efficiency gap materialized in goaltending variance. L. Ullmark faced cleaner chances and posted a 0.923 save percentage, crediting 1.05 goals above expected. C. Lindgren confronted the inverse: a 0.794 save percentage on 27 saves against 34 shots, 2.53 goals below expected—underperformance rooted in shot quality rather than volume.

The Senators' assault came from multiple angles. On 29 rush chances, they converted 4 into goals. Net-crashing yielded 6 rebound opportunities, 2 converted. The power play was clinical: 3 goals on 9 shots (1.00 xG). Drake Batherson's snap shot from the doorstep (P3, 14:22) encapsulated the pattern—Ottawa manufactured higher-percentage chances and buried them.

The Senators overperformed their xG by 2.53 goals, a margin reflecting elite execution rather than variance.


Final: OTT 7 – WSH 1

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT3 / 8 · 1.84 xG
WSH0 / 4 · 1.01 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT3 / 20 · 2.15 xG
WSH1 / 5 · 0.55 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT1 / 29 · 0.48 xG
WSH0 / 45 · 0.48 xG

OTT went 3-for-8 from high danger on 1.84 expected goals — 1.2 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
7 G · 4.47 xG · +2.5
WSH
1 G · 2.05 xG · -1.1
012345678
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. UllmarkOTT
+1.0
C. LindgrenWSH
-2.5

OTT finished +2.5 against expected, WSH -1.1 — C. Lindgren (WSH) allowed 2.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
SNAP2/23
WRIST2/5
BACKHAND2/6
TIP IN1/6
SLAP0/3
BAT0/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/12
WSH
SNAP0/15
WRIST0/4
BACKHAND1/3
TIP IN0/2
SLAP0/4
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/25
OTT
WSH
Off the rush
4 G on 29 · 3.13 xG
0 G on 18 · 1.62 xG
Off rebounds
2 G on 6 · 1.05 xG
1 G on 1 · 0.08 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: OTT went 2-for-23, WSH 0-for-15. OTT scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Cozens
#24 · C · OTT
2 G · 1 A · 7 SOG · 19:44 TOI
D. Batherson
#19 · R · OTT
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 11:47 TOI · +1
A. Zub
#2 · D · OTT
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 18:12 TOI · +4
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • L. Ullmark (OTT) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
  • C. Lindgren (WSH) gave up 2.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • OTT had the higher quality looks — 0.078 xG/shot vs 0.038.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • OTT created 6 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT outperformed their expected goals by 2.5 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • OTT power play was dominant — 3 PPG on 9 PP shots (1.00 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · OTT at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

Senators at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 1:06 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
OTT
Model favorite
53%
47%
OTT50WSH

OTT by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score OTT 2.62.5 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

OTT← edge
edge →WSH
56.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
53.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.66xGF / 602.62
2.12xGA / 602.62
2.18Goals for / gm2.18
1.99Goals against / gm1.79
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.018

OTT holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model sees this as nearly even: Senators at 53% win probability, projected score 2.6-2.5 Ottawa. A pick'em doesn't capture the full story, though.

The Capitals enter hotter, posting a 7-3-0 record over their last 10 games. The Senators, meanwhile, sit at -14 goal differential in that same stretch—a sign of play that hasn't yet translated to results. Form favors Washington here.

But the underlying numbers tell a different story. At 5v5, the Senators own a 56.0% expected-goals share versus Washington's 50.0%, and control territory at 53.0% Corsi. They're tilting the ice consistently. This is where the edge lives: Ottawa is generating better chances, even if recent results don't reflect it yet.

Washington's path relies on regression. The Capitals are running at a 1.018 PDO, well above league average. That luck—converting at a higher rate than underlying play justifies—tends to correct. Ottawa's 0.993 PDO tells the opposite story: they're leaving goals on the table. If those percentages normalize, the Senators' superior play carries the game.

L. Thompson faces a back-to-back start. Monitor whether Ottawa leans on the backup or pushes the starter through; fatigue shapes these matchups.

Defensively, Nick Jensen for Ottawa and Declan Chisholm for Washington both represent vulnerabilities that either side could exploit.

Players to Watch

  • Brady Tkachuk (1.19 xG/60, 11 goals, 20 assists, 2 HD goals, 7.5% shooting)
  • Dylan Cozens (1.00 xG/60, 13 goals, 15 assists, 1 HD goal, 9.5% shooting)
  • Alex Ovechkin (0.97 xG/60, 19 goals, 17 assists, 2 HD goals, 13.8% shooting)
  • Anthony Beauvillier (0.89 xG/60, 14 goals, 9 assists, 2 HD goals, 10.4% shooting)
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters