Motion-blurred skater in a Calgary Flames sweater
Breakdown · NYR at CGY

Flames pull away from the Rangers

The verdict · coin flip

The Flames won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

NYR 1 · CGY 5
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 1:22 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The 5-1 scoreline lied. By expected goals—the underlying shot quality measure—the Rangers were nearly even with Calgary, trailing only 3.06–3.21. But goaltending variance and puck luck turned the close underlying game into a blowout.

D. Wolf was immaculate for the Flames. He stopped 30 of 31 shots (0.968 SV%), earning him 2.21 goals above expected—theft-grade play that single-handedly swung the game. I. Shesterkin made 25 saves on 30 shots and surrendered 1.94 goals worse than expected, well short of what his quality of chances demanded.

Calgary's lethality came in two places. They scored three goals from low-danger areas—areas where opposing goalies are supposed to make the save—and capitalized on the rush at a brutal rate: 3 goals on 28 attempts. The Rangers generated quality but couldn't finish. They underperformed their expected goals by 2.2, a cautionary tale of wasted chances.

B. Coleman was the catalyst. His 2-goal, 18:24-minute night gave Calgary its spark; N. Kadri added a goal and assist in the same ice time; M. Backlund potted two assists in 16:43. Calgary's high-danger chances favored them 5–3, and they translated that edge into volume. The Flames held 49% of shot attempts (30–31), a modest edge that the scoreboard magnified.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Oct 26
NYR
1
CGY
5

Flames pull away from the Rangers

Chances 3.2 – 3.1Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Flames took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
NYR
3.21
CGY
3.06
51% of the chances49%

The board read NYR 1, CGY 5. The chances read NYR 3.2, CGY 3.1.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
CGY
+1.9
goals above expected
CGY3.06 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR3.21 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Flames scored 1.9 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:42CGYN. Kadri0–1
  2. P1 09:21CGYK. Bahl0–2
  3. P1 09:31NYRN. Laba1–2
  4. P2 12:28CGYY. Sharangovich1–3
  5. P3 06:42CGYB. ColemanSH1–4
  6. P3 14:27CGYB. Coleman1–5
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYR
48 shots
1
Final
95 shots
CGY
47 shots
5
NYR attackCGY attack
NYR CGY Goal
48
shots · 1 in
47
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYRCGY
0 / 3
0.84 xG
High danger
1 / 5
1.12 xG
1 / 14
1.72 xG
Medium
1 / 14
1.35 xG
0 / 51
0.66 xG
Low
3 / 52
0.60 xG

The Rangers went 0 for 3 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
D. Wolf
+2.2
CGY · 30/31
F
I. Shesterkin
−1.9
NYR · 25/30
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Flames pull away from the Rangers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 5–12
  1. 01:42CGYN. Kadri(J. Huberdeau, J. Hanley)0–1
  2. 09:21CGYK. Bahl(M. Frost, N. Kadri)0–2
  3. 09:31NYRN. Laba(W. Cuylle, V. Gavrikov)1–2
2ndshots 13–11
  1. 12:28CGYY. Sharangovich(C. Zary, J. Farabee)1–3
3rdshots 13–7
  1. 06:42CGYB. Colemanshorthanded(M. Backlund)1–4
  2. 14:27CGYB. Coleman(M. Backlund)1–5

score reads NYR–CGY

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.06
CGY chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.9
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.056
CGY puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
51.1%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.21Expected goals3.06
NYR 51% of the chance quality
31Shots on goal30
3High-danger chances5
68All attempts (Corsi)71
Adjusted for score: NYR 54% · CGY 46%
Faceoffs · CGY won52%off27%neu50%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR0 / 3 · 0.84 xG
CGY1 / 5 · 1.12 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR1 / 14 · 1.72 xG
CGY1 / 14 · 1.35 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR0 / 51 · 0.66 xG
CGY3 / 52 · 0.60 xG

CGY went 3-for-52 from low danger on 0.60 expected goals — 2.4 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
1 G · 3.21 xG · -2.2
CGY
5 G · 3.06 xG · +1.9
0123456

NYR finished -2.2 against expected, CGY +1.9.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST0/25
SLAP0/7
SNAP1/5
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/3
POKE0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/20
CGY
WRIST4/32
SLAP0/5
SNAP1/5
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/2
POKE0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/24
NYR
CGY
Off the rush
1 G on 24
2.46 xG
3 G on 28
2.24 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2
0.26 xG
0 G on 3
0.35 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 0-for-25, CGY 4-for-32. CGY scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
I. Shesterkin
NYR · 25/30 · .833
-1.9
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.1+0.1
Medium1/141.4+0.3
Low3/520.6-2.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

D. Wolf
CGY · 30/31 · .968
+2.2
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/30.8+0.8
Medium1/141.7+0.7
Low0/510.7+0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

95 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NYR
48 shots
1
Final
95 shots
CGY
47 shots
5
NYR attackCGY attack
NYR CGY Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, CGY right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Coleman
#20 · L · CGY
2 G · 0 A · 7 SOG · 18:24 on ice · +2
N. Kadri
#91 · C · CGY
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 18:24 on ice · +2
M. Backlund
#11 · C · CGY
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 16:43 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sun, Oct 26
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 1:21 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects 2.5-2.5 with Calgary at 51% win probability. That's a coin flip.

Recent form diverges sharply. The Rangers are 3-5-2 in their last 10; the Flames sit at -19 goal differential over the same stretch. New York's trending hot, Calgary cold. But season-long metrics compress toward parity: both teams are at 49.0% Corsi%, with the Rangers at 48.0% xG% and the Flames at 47.0%. That differential doesn't move the needle.

The Flames' 0.985 PDO signals regression. They're running ice-cold and due for positive variance—a tailwind the Rangers' 1.009 doesn't provide. Calgary also holds a rest edge: one day versus New York's three. One wildcard: D. Wolf is on a back-to-back. Watch whether Calgary rolls out a backup or asks Wolf to shoulder consecutive starts.

Players to Watch

For New York, Adam Sykora is running 0.91 xG/60 with 3G and 1A on a 20.0% shooting rate—efficiency at volume. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8G 11A) has added 2 hard-drive goals on a cooler 13.1% clip.

Calgary counters with Blake Coleman (0.89 xG/60, 16G 12A, 2 hard-drive goals, 11.4% shooting) and Matt Coronato (0.80 xG/60, 10G 16A, 6.6% shooting).

Both teams register 0% hard-drive and rebound goal rates—a tactical mirror suggesting either immaculate crease control or exposure there. The Rangers' defensive weak link is Vincent Iorio; for Calgary, it's Matt Coronato.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

CGY 51%
51%
CGY
Model favorite
49%
51%
NYR50CGY

CGY by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NYR 2.5–2.5 CGY; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR← edge
edge →CGY
48.0%47.0%
49.0%49.0%
2.262.36
2.402.66
1.881.76
1.902.15
1.0090.985

NYR holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.009 vs 0.985) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NYR
3-5-2
-3 GD · 3d rest
CGY
1-7-2
-19 GD · 1d rest
1.009
NYR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.985
CGY PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Flames' PDO is 0.985 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • D. Wolf is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Rangers are the hotter team by points pace (3-5-2 in their last 10).
  • The Flames are underwater at -19 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Flames' PDO is 0.985 — running cold, due for positive regression.
  • The Rangers have 2 more days of rest.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NYR
Expected in goal
I. Shesterkin
3 days rest.750 last start
Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

CGY
Expected in goal
D. Wolf
back-to-back.871 last start
Backup Dustin Wolf · -1.8 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
CGY
Blake Coleman16G 12A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.4% sh
Matt Coronato10G 16A
0.80 xG/60 · 0 HD · 6.6% sh
Keep going

Where to next