Backcheck
Recap · STL at PIT

Penguins pull away from the Blues

The Penguins won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 1:39 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
STL
St. Louis Blues
3
Home
PIT
Pittsburgh Penguins
6
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.42Expected goals3.49
51% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)26
2High-danger chances5
66Corsi (all attempts)47
Score-adjusted: 62% / 38%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Pittsburgh's 6-3 victory overstated their control—expected goals split 3.49–3.42, a gap smaller than one goal in favor of the Penguins. They overperformed their xG by 2.51 goals, meaning the scoreboard magnified what was closer underneath.

The high-danger metrics show why. Pittsburgh generated 5 high-danger chances to St. Louis's 2, a 2.5-to-1 edge in the most dangerous scoring areas. That translated to execution: Pittsburgh converted 2 of 5 high-danger chances (40%), clinical finishing when it mattered.

Quality over volume defined the difference. Pittsburgh's shot quality (0.074 xG per attempt) exceeded St. Louis's (0.052), meaning each Penguins shot carried more threat. Off the rush, Pittsburgh scored 5 goals on 21 chances; St. Louis managed 3 on 29, more attempts wasted.

Evgeni Malkin's wrist shot from the top of the circles in the third period (16:59) crystallized Pittsburgh's control—a high-danger look that captured their edge.

The goaltending split widened the gap. T. Jarry stopped 25 of 28 shots (0.893 SV%). J. Hofer faced 25 and saved 20 (0.800 SV%), underperforming his expected save percentage by 1.51 goals. Pittsburgh's edge in high-danger execution, rush efficiency, and goaltending transformed a close underlying game into a 6-3 final.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL0 / 2 · 0.47 xG
PIT2 / 5 · 1.67 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL3 / 21 · 2.25 xG
PIT4 / 13 · 1.48 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL0 / 43 · 0.69 xG
PIT0 / 29 · 0.35 xG

PIT went 4-for-13 from medium danger on 1.48 expected goals — 2.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
3 G · 3.42 xG · -0.4
PIT
6 G · 3.49 xG · +2.5
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. HoferSTL
-1.5
T. JarryPIT
+0.4

STL finished -0.4 against expected, PIT +2.5 — J. Hofer (STL) allowed 1.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
WRIST2/24
SLAP0/7
TIP IN0/5
SNAP1/5
BACKHAND0/3
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/21
PIT
WRIST3/23
SLAP0/2
TIP IN1/3
SNAP2/3
BACKHAND0/1
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/13
STL
PIT
Off the rush
3 G on 29 · 2.04 xG
5 G on 21 · 2.15 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.73 xG
1 G on 3 · 0.89 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: STL went 2-for-24, PIT 3-for-23. PIT scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
E. Karlsson
#65 · D · PIT
0 G · 3 A · 1 SOG · 23:52 TOI · +3
B. Rust
#17 · R · PIT
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 18:59 TOI · +2
S. Crosby
#87 · C · PIT
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 18:02 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Hofer (STL) gave up 1.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • PIT generated far more dangerous chances — 0.074 xG/shot vs 0.052. Quality over quantity.
  • PIT was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • PIT was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • STL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • PIT created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • STL created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PIT outperformed their expected goals by 2.5 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · STL at PIT · 7:00 PM ET

Blues at Penguins: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 1:24 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
PIT
Model favorite
46%
54%
STL50PIT

PIT by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score STL 2.42.7 PIT; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

STL← edge
edge →PIT
49.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
48.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.34xGF / 602.66
2.40xGA / 602.55
2.00Goals for / gm2.45
2.12Goals against / gm2.12
1.000PDO — luck, not skill1.012

PIT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.000 vs 1.012) says PIT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model sets Pittsburgh at 54% to win in a 2.4-2.7 goal range—as even as matchups get. The teams split on underlying metrics: Pittsburgh leads 51.0% xG% to St. Louis's 49.0%, and 50.0% Corsi% to 48.0%, but neither has stolen luck (Pittsburgh 1.012 PDO, St. Louis 1.000).

The Blues center on Jimmy Snuggerud. His 0.86 xG/60 translates to 15 goals and 22 assists, two of them high-danger; his 11.9% shooting rate sits slightly above the median. Dylan Holloway provides secondary punch at 0.82 xG/60 with 13 goals, 24 assists, and a 10.8% rate.

Pittsburgh's Filip Hallander, recalled from an AHL conditioning loan, is out for further evaluation. That removes their most prolific interior producer—he was generating 1.28 xG/60. Rickard Rakell inherits the burden at 1.01 xG/60: 13 goals, 13 assists, three on high-danger chances at a 12.1% clip.

A shared weakness: both teams have zero high-danger goals and zero rebound goals at 5v5 this season, a statistical floor unlikely to hold. St. Louis's defensive hole is Snuggerud—elite volume, zero value on the other end. Pittsburgh's is Caleb Jones.

The deciding factor: goaltending. The models say this is even, which means the save percentage wins the night.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
PIT
Filip Hallander0G 3A
1.28 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Rickard Rakell13G 13A
1.01 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters