Blackhawks pull away from the Senators
The Blackhawks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Blackhawks beat the Senators 7-3 — a convincing scoreline for a game expected goals said should have been nearly even. Chicago's 2.94 xG against Ottawa's 2.63 suggested a tight contest, yet the Blackhawks won by four. They simply finished better.
Chicago was clinical in the high-danger zone, converting 2 of 4 chances (50%). They also scored twice from low-danger areas — opportunities L. Ullmark should have stopped. Most telling: the Blackhawks scored seven times on 22 rush chances. Ottawa scored twice on 21 rush attempts. On the rush, Chicago executed; Ottawa squandered.
C. Bedard led Chicago with three goals and an assist. F. Nazar, whose wrist shot from the high slot proved decisive, added a goal and an assist. D. Batherson posted two assists for Ottawa.
S. Knight made 21 saves on 24 shots (0.875 save percentage), unspectacular but steady. L. Ullmark surrendered 3.1 goals beyond expected on 25 shots (0.760), the cost of facing an opponent that converted relentlessly.
The Blackhawks outperformed their expected goals by 4.06 — elite finishing or fortune, or both. When xG says close and the scoreboard says blowout, the difference is finishing: Chicago executed on the rush, Ottawa did not.
The danger ladder
CHI went 3-for-9 from medium danger on 0.85 expected goals — 2.1 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
OTT finished +0.4 against expected, CHI +4.1 — L. Ullmark (OTT) allowed 3.1 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 3-for-31, CHI 5-for-26. CHI scored 7 of theirs off the rush.
- L. Ullmark (OTT) gave up 3.1 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- CHI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
- CHI scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- CHI was lethal off the rush — 7 goals on 22 rush chances.
- OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
- CHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- CHI outperformed their expected goals by 4.1 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.