Motion-blurred skater in a green sweater
Breakdown · WSH at DAL

Stars shut out the Capitals, 1-0

The verdict · earned

The Stars earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 0 · DAL 1
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 2:00 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The expected goals said close to even—Dallas 3.62, Washington 3.22—but the Stars won. Goaltending decided it.

Oettinger was perfect: 24 saves on 24 shots, a +3.22 versus expected. Thompson was nearly perfect: 18 saves on 19, a +2.62. The difference was that single goal Tyler Seguin scored at 00:43 of the second period from a sharp angle.

Both teams wasted their chances. Dallas generated the sharper looks—0.077 expected goals per shot versus Washington's 0.053—but scored just once on six high-danger chances. Washington had five high-danger chances and scored zero. By the metrics that mattered (expected goals, shot quality, rebounding opportunities), this game was even. The goalies made it lopsided.

Dallas held 44% of shot attempts (19 on goal versus 24) yet stayed competitive in expected goals. That's the asymmetry: fewer shot attempts, better shot quality. Washington threw more pucks at Oettinger but produced lower-percentage looks, then couldn't finish the few dangerous ones they had.

Thompson was particularly stingy on high-danger chances, stopping all six. Oettinger simply didn't need to. He faced clean looks and turned them into nothing. One goal was all it took in a game where expected scoring suggested each team should have put away two or three.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Oct 28
WSH
0
DAL
1

Stars shut out the Capitals, 1-0

Chances 3.2 – 3.6Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Stars earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
3.22
DAL
3.62
47% of the chances53%

The board read WSH 0, DAL 1. The chances read WSH 3.2, DAL 3.6.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
DAL
−2.6
goals above expected
DAL3.62 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored
WSH3.22 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals left 3.2 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 00:43DALT. SeguinPP0–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
41 shots
0
Final
73 shots
DAL
32 shots
1
WSH attackDAL attack
WSH DAL Goal
41
shots · 0 in
32
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHDAL
0 / 5
1.01 xG
High danger
0 / 6
1.89 xG
0 / 12
1.47 xG
Medium
1 / 13
1.42 xG
0 / 44
0.74 xG
Low
0 / 28
0.30 xG

The Capitals went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Oettinger
+3.2
DAL · 24/24
A+
L. Thompson
+2.6
WSH · 18/19
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Stars shut out the Capitals, 1-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 8–9no goals
    2ndshots 10–5
    1. 00:43DALT. Seguinpower play(M. Heiskanen, M. Rantanen)0–1
    3rdshots 6–5no goals

      score reads WSH–DAL

      Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
      Process vs result

      The numbers

      XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
      3.62
      DAL chances
      Goals their shots were worth
      −2.6
      Finishing
      Goals below what those chances were worth
      1.021
      DAL puck luck
      Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
      43.5%
      Shot attempts
      Under half — they were outshot
      Split by club

      Who controlled the game

      3.22Expected goals3.62
      DAL 53% of the chance quality
      24Shots on goal19
      5High-danger chances6
      61All attempts (Corsi)47
      Adjusted for score: WSH 59% · DAL 41%
      Faceoffs · DAL won44%off50%neu67%def
      Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
      How the game was won

      The danger ladder

      shotsgoalsexpected
      High dangerslot & crease
      WSH0 / 5 · 1.01 xG
      DAL0 / 6 · 1.89 xG
      Medium dangermid-range
      WSH0 / 12 · 1.47 xG
      DAL1 / 13 · 1.42 xG
      Low dangerperimeter & point
      WSH0 / 44 · 0.74 xG
      DAL0 / 28 · 0.30 xG

      DAL went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.89 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
      The luck layer

      Finishing vs expected

      expectedactual
      WSH
      0 G · 3.22 xG · -3.2
      DAL
      1 G · 3.62 xG · -2.6
      01234

      WSH finished -3.2 against expected, DAL -2.6.

      Source · Backcheck xG model
      Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
      What they shot — and what went in

      Shot diet

      goalsshots
      WSH
      SNAP0/20
      TIP IN0/7
      WRIST0/6
      BACKHAND0/4
      SLAP0/3
      DEFLECTED0/1
      OTHER0/20
      DAL
      SNAP1/16
      TIP IN0/4
      WRIST0/3
      BACKHAND0/4
      SLAP0/4
      DEFLECTED0/1
      OTHER0/15
      WSH
      DAL
      Off the rush
      0 G on 27
      2.29 xG
      1 G on 16
      1.57 xG
      Off rebounds
      0 G on 1
      0.11 xG
      0 G on 4
      0.80 xG

      Snap shots carried the volume: WSH went 0-for-20, DAL 1-for-16.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
      New to these numbers?

      Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

      The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

      xG
      Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
      HD
      High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
      Corsi
      Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
      Adj.
      Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
      GSAx
      Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
      PDO
      Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
      Shot by shot

      In the net

      Graded on goals saved above expected
      L. Thompson
      WSH · 18/19 · .947
      +2.6
      saved above expected
      A+
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger0/61.9+1.9
      Medium1/131.4+0.4
      Low0/280.3+0.3

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      J. Oettinger
      DAL · 24/24 · 1.000
      +3.2
      saved above expected
      A+
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger0/51.0+1.0
      Medium0/121.5+1.5
      Low0/440.7+0.7

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      73 shots · press play to watch the game back

      Where the shots came from

      NHL play-by-play coordinates
      WSH
      41 shots
      0
      Final
      73 shots
      DAL
      32 shots
      1
      WSH attackDAL attack
      WSH DAL Goal

      Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, DAL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

      Ranked from the box score

      Three stars

      Points first
      Three stars · computed, not voted
      M. Heiskanen
      #4 · D · DAL
      0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 23:22 on ice
      M. Rantanen
      #96 · R · DAL
      0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 21:33 on ice
      T. Seguin
      #91 · C · DAL
      1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 19:07 on ice
      Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
      What the model said beforehand

      Before the game

      Written Tue, Oct 28
      Open the pre-game read
      Written from the numbers

      The read

      Edited for clarity
      ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 1:41 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

      The models can't pick a winner. A 2.5–2.6 goal projection with the Stars at 53% win probability isn't a forecast; it's a shrug. Washington and Dallas have arrived at nearly identical competitive states through different paths, and tonight one team's small edge will either hold or evaporate.

      The efficiency numbers reveal why the pick is stuck. Washington leads in Corsi% at 49.0% to Dallas's 47.0%, meaning the Capitals are outworking their opponent at five-on-five—more shot attempts, more volume. But Dallas counters with a 51.0% xG% versus Washington's 50.0%, which means the Stars are converting their chances into higher-quality looks. One team controls possession; the other converts it more ruthlessly. Neither edge is large enough to call dominant.

      The complication is sustainability. Dallas is sitting at a 1.024 PDO, suggesting their shooting efficiency is running ahead of expectation; regression is baked in. Washington's 1.018 PDO isn't as stark, but it's still warm. Both teams are due for cold spells, though neither is built to survive one tonight.

      The player matchup becomes the tiebreaker. Alex Ovechkin remains Washington's frame—19 goals and 17 assists on a 0.97 xG/60 rate, with two high-danger chances and a 13.8% shooting percentage that suggests he's still converting at a clip above average. Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 10.4% shooting) is Washington's leverage; he's generating 0.89 xG/60, meaning his finishing has been a genuine difference-maker.

      Dallas counters with Jason Robertson, who leads in raw production: 25 goals, 21 assists, two high-danger chances, and 12.4% shooting. He's operating at 0.96 xG/60, nearly identical to Ovechkin's volume but in a different system. Michael Bunting has been quieter (8 goals, 0.83 xG/60), but his 7.6% shooting rate hints at untapped potential.

      The defensive weak links cut both ways. Declan Chisholm has been Washington's liability; Tyler Myers for Dallas. Neither defense is rated to shut anyone down, so whoever's secondary scoring activates first—whoever cashes a Beauvillier or Bunting chance instead of just generating it—shifts the balance.

      This is as close to pick'em as analytics gets. The models aren't hedging; they're genuinely uncertain. That uncertainty is earned.

      What the model said beforehand

      The model's lean

      DAL 53%
      53%
      DAL
      Model favorite
      47%
      53%
      WSH50DAL

      DAL by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WSH 2.5–2.6 DAL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

      Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
      Season rates · 5v5

      Tale of the tape

      NHL stats API · our xG
      WSH← edge
      edge →DAL
      50.0%51.0%
      49.0%47.0%
      2.622.36
      2.622.29
      2.182.07
      1.791.68
      1.0181.024

      The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (1.018 vs 1.024) says DAL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

      Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
      Form · Last 10
      WSH
      7-3-0
      +7 GD · 3d rest
      DAL
      6-3-1
      -1 GD · 2d rest
      1.018
      WSH PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      1.024
      DAL PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      What decides it

      Keys to the game

      Regression watch
      • The Stars' PDO is 1.024 — running hot, expect some regression.
      • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
      Things to watch
      • The Stars' PDO is 1.024 — running hot, expect some regression.
      Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

      Lineups

      NHL box score
      WSH
      Expected in goal
      C. Lindgren
      3 days rest.794 last start
      Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      DAL
      Expected in goal
      C. DeSmith
      2 days rest.920 last start
      Backup Jake Oettinger · +5.7 GSAx this season

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

      Computed danger · scouting

      Players to watch

      NHL stats API · our xG
      WSH
      Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
      0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
      Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
      0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
      DAL
      Jason Robertson25G 21A
      0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
      Michael Bunting8G 14A
      0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
      Keep going

      Where to next