Motion-blurred skater in a New York Islanders sweater
Breakdown · NYI at WSH

I. Sorokin stands tall as the Islanders edge the Capitals

The verdict · earned

The Islanders earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NYI 3 · WSH 1
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 2:06 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Capitals had the underlying advantage and lost 3-1 anyway. Expected goals split 4.13 to 3.66 in their favor, high-danger chances nearly even at 8–7—yet the Islanders got the win. That gap traces directly to Sorokin, who finished at 0.957 save percentage and stopped 2.66 goals above expected.

The game itself stayed tactically balanced: 23 shot attempts each, 15 combined high-danger chances. Washington pressed effectively, generating five rebound opportunities without converting any—a rare miss for a net-crashing team. L. Thompson faced 22 shots and saved 2.13 goals above expected, a strong line, but the Capitals still couldn't overcome the deficit.

The Islanders' edge came through transition. Two goals on 25 rush chances—a conversion rate that neutralized Washington's underlying advantage. Mathew Barzal's snap shot from the point at 18:44 of the second set the tone the Capitals never answered.

Washington finished 2.66 goals below expected. When a team carries better underlying metrics to a three-goal loss, goaltending tilts the result. Thompson performed above his expected line. Sorokin performed farther above his. One save percentage at 0.957, one at 0.909—the difference decided an otherwise even game.

The Three Stars:

  • #3 M. Roy (WSH) — 1A in 21:21
  • #14 B. Horvat (NYI) — 1G in 20:34
  • #6 J. Chychrun (WSH) — 1A in 20:21
The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Oct 31
NYI
3
WSH
1

I. Sorokin stands tall as the Islanders edge the Capitals

Chances 4.1 – 3.7Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Islanders earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
NYI
4.13
WSH
3.66
53% of the chances47%

The board read NYI 3, WSH 1. The chances read NYI 4.1, WSH 3.7.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYI
−1.1
goals above expected
NYI4.13 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
WSH3.66 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals left 2.7 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 04:48WSHT. Wilson0–1
  2. P2 14:58NYIJ. PageauSH1–1
  3. P3 04:29NYIB. Horvat2–1
  4. P3 18:44NYIM. BarzalEN3–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYI
40 shots
3
Final
74 shots
WSH
34 shots
1
NYI attackWSH attack
NYI WSH Goal
40
shots · 3 in
34
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYIWSH
2 / 7
1.95 xG
High danger
1 / 8
1.97 xG
1 / 16
1.81 xG
Medium
0 / 12
1.35 xG
0 / 31
0.36 xG
Low
0 / 32
0.33 xG

The Islanders buried 2 of 7 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
I. Sorokin
+2.7
NYI · 22/23
A
L. Thompson
+2.1
WSH · 20/22
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

I. Sorokin stands tall as the Islanders edge the Capitals

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–13no goals
    2ndshots 10–6
    1. 04:48WSHT. Wilson(J. Chychrun, M. Roy)0–1
    2. 14:58NYIJ. Pageaushorthanded(S. Holmstrom)1–1
    3rdshots 7–4
    1. 04:29NYIB. Horvat(E. Heineman, R. Pulock)2–1
    2. 18:44NYIM. Barzalempty net(A. Pelech)3–1

    score reads NYI–WSH

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    4.13
    NYI chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −1.1
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.036
    NYI puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    50.9%
    Shot attempts
    Over half — they had the puck more
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    4.13Expected goals3.66
    NYI 53% of the chance quality
    23Shots on goal23
    7High-danger chances8
    54All attempts (Corsi)52
    Adjusted for score: NYI 51% · WSH 49%
    Faceoffs · WSH won38%off31%neu43%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    NYI2 / 7 · 1.95 xG
    WSH1 / 8 · 1.97 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    NYI1 / 16 · 1.81 xG
    WSH0 / 12 · 1.35 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    NYI0 / 31 · 0.36 xG
    WSH0 / 32 · 0.33 xG

    WSH went 0-for-12 from medium danger on 1.35 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    NYI
    3 G · 4.13 xG · -1.1
    WSH
    1 G · 3.66 xG · -2.7
    012345

    NYI finished -1.1 against expected, WSH -2.7.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    NYI
    SNAP2/22
    SLAP0/8
    WRIST0/5
    TIP IN1/2
    BACKHAND0/3
    BETWEEN LEGS0/0
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    DEFLECTED0/0
    OTHER0/14
    WSH
    SNAP1/15
    SLAP0/7
    WRIST0/6
    TIP IN0/3
    BACKHAND0/0
    BETWEEN LEGS0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    DEFLECTED0/1
    OTHER0/18
    NYI
    WSH
    Off the rush
    2 G on 25
    2.60 xG
    1 G on 20
    2.43 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 2
    0.24 xG
    0 G on 5
    0.79 xG

    Snap shots carried the volume: NYI went 2-for-22, WSH 1-for-15. NYI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    I. Sorokin
    NYI · 22/23 · .957
    +2.7
    saved above expected
    A+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/82.0+1.0
    Medium0/121.4+1.4
    Low0/320.3+0.3

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    L. Thompson
    WSH · 20/22 · .909
    +2.1
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger2/71.9-0.1
    Medium1/161.8+0.8
    Low0/310.4+0.4

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    74 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    NYI
    40 shots
    3
    Final
    74 shots
    WSH
    34 shots
    1
    NYI attackWSH attack
    NYI WSH Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — NYI left, WSH right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    M. Roy
    #3 · D · WSH
    0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 21:21 on ice
    B. Horvat
    #14 · C · NYI
    1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 20:34 on ice · +1
    J. Chychrun
    #6 · D · WSH
    0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 20:21 on ice · -1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Fri, Oct 31
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 2:04 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.5–2.8 goal spread with Washington at 54% win probability—a coin flip with slight Capitals lean.

    New York has slipped to -5 goal differential over its last ten games. At 48.0% expected goals, the Islanders are underperforming expectation in shot quality; Washington's 50.0% xG% sits modestly above, though both sit at 49.0% Corsis.

    Washington's real edge is managerial: the Capitals are running a 1.018 PDO, cashing chances at rates that won't hold. Regression is near. New York's 0.993 sits at league-expected levels, suggesting their recent skid reflects actual play drift rather than variance luck.

    The goaltending axis tilts toward uncertainty. D. Rittich enters on the second half of a back-to-back, a scenario that often yields either a backup start or a fatigued starter—neither helps Washington's cause.

    Offensively, Anders Lee drives New York's attack at 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes, converting at a bloated 6.4% rate (9 goals, 20 assists) that obscures genuine quality—he's posted two high-danger goals. Bo Horvat's 12.8% conversion is more sustainable: 18 goals on 0.87 xG per 60 yields real upside from his three high-danger tallies.

    Washington counters with Alex Ovechkin at 0.97 xG per 60, a dip from his career average. His 13.8% shooting (19 goals, 17 assists) is inflated; two high-danger goals offer some shelter, but expect regression. Anthony Beauvillier's steadier profile—0.89 xG per 60, 14 goals at a realistic 10.4%, anchored by two high-danger conversions—poses the greater long-term threat.

    Defensively, Alexander Romanov and Declan Chisholm both present weak links, though neither team generates rebounds or high-danger chances at rates that fully exploit those gaps. The defensive vulnerabilities exist; the volume to punish them does not.

    This is as close as it gets.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    WSH 54%
    54%
    WSH
    Model favorite
    46%
    54%
    NYI50WSH

    WSH by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.5–2.8 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI← edge
    edge →WSH
    48.0%50.0%
    49.0%49.0%
    2.482.62
    2.692.62
    1.782.18
    1.941.79
    0.9931.018

    WSH holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.993 vs 1.018) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    NYI
    4-5-1
    -5 GD · 1d rest
    WSH
    6-4-0
    +5 GD · 2d rest
    0.993
    NYI PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.018
    WSH PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Regression watch
    • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Things to watch
    • D. Rittich is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Islanders are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
    • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    NYI
    Expected in goal
    D. Rittich
    back-to-back.824 last start
    Backup Ilya Sorokin · +25.3 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    WSH
    Expected in goal
    L. Thompson
    2 days rest.947 last start
    Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI
    Anders Lee9G 20A
    1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
    Bo Horvat18G 10A
    0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
    WSH
    Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
    0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
    Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
    0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next