Canadiens run the Senators off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Canadiens earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Canadiens edged the Senators 4-3 in overtime and controlled 61% of expected goals (3.65–2.35)—a dominant margin the scoreboard barely reflected.
Shot attempts (27–17 Canadiens) confirmed the imbalance. The Canadiens generated far higher-quality chances: 0.072 expected goals per shot versus Ottawa's 0.043. The Senators stayed alive through L. Ullmark's 0.852 SV% while S. Montembeault saved 14 of 17 (−0.65 vs. expected).
Both teams excelled on the rush with similar efficiency—the Canadiens scored 4 goals on 26 attempts, Ottawa 3 on 20. The difference was the Canadiens' depth elsewhere. High-danger chances went 6–5 Canadiens, a reflection of sustained offensive pressure.
Alex Newhook's snap shot from the high slot at 1:40 of overtime ended it. The Three Stars were N. Suzuki (2A), C. Caufield (1G, 1A), and D. Batherson (1G, 1A). Suzuki's playmaking and Caufield's scoring embodied the Canadiens' offensive control.
The Senators' tight finish masked a lopsided contest. The Canadiens dictated pace and shot quality; Ottawa hung around through scrappy play and L. Ullmark's sharp work. The xG spread told the truth.
The danger ladder
MTL went 3-for-15 from medium danger on 1.65 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
OTT finished +0.7 against expected, MTL +0.3 — S. Montembeault (MTL) allowed 0.7 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: OTT went 1-for-26, MTL 3-for-28. MTL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- MTL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.072 xG/shot vs 0.043. Quality over quantity.
- OTT was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
- MTL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 26 rush chances.
- OTT was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 20 rush chances.
- MTL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.