Backcheck
Recap · CHI at SEA

J. Daccord stands tall as the Kraken edge the Blackhawks

The Kraken stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.47–3.46 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 2:30 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
1
Home
SEA
Seattle Kraken
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.47Expected goals3.46
56% share for the better side
30Shot attempts (SOG)24
10High-danger chances2
65Corsi (all attempts)45
Score-adjusted: 64% / 36%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Kraken won 3–1, but the underlying play suggested otherwise. Chicago controlled 56% of expected goals at 5v5 and registered 10 high-danger chances to Seattle's 2. The Blackhawks played better and lost anyway.

This was goaltending that stole a result. J. Daccord made 29 of 30 saves (0.967 SV%), finishing +3.47 goals above expected. On 10 high-danger chances, he stopped 9. A. Soderblom (Chicago, 21/24, 0.875 SV%) gave up three.

Chicago's finishing collapsed: 4.47 expected goals, 1 goal scored. They underperformed their xG by 3.47. The Kraken, thin on chances, converted what mattered. M. Beniers (1G, 1A in 19:05) and J. Eberle (1G, 1A in 17:31) struck on transition—Seattle netted 2 goals from 18 rush attempts. Eberle's wrist shot from the high slot came in the third period (16:05), the turning point.

The shot-attempt gap (24–30 in Chicago's favor) captured the game: Blackhawks pressed, Kraken sat back and countered. Daccord's 0.967 mark made the strategy work.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CHI1 / 10 · 2.28 xG
SEA0 / 2 · 1.36 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CHI0 / 13 · 1.53 xG
SEA2 / 16 · 1.75 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CHI0 / 42 · 0.65 xG
SEA1 / 27 · 0.35 xG

CHI went 0-for-13 from medium danger on 1.53 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CHI
1 G · 4.47 xG · -3.5
SEA
3 G · 3.46 xG · -0.5
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. SoderblomCHI
+0.5
J. DaccordSEA
+3.5

CHI finished -3.5 against expected, SEA -0.5 — J. Daccord (SEA) saved 3.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CHI
WRIST1/30
TIP IN0/6
SNAP0/5
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/20
SEA
WRIST2/19
TIP IN0/5
SNAP1/3
BACKHAND0/5
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/11
CHI
SEA
Off the rush
1 G on 32 · 3.05 xG
2 G on 18 · 1.56 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 1.03 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.28 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CHI went 1-for-30, SEA 2-for-19. SEA scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Beniers
#10 · C · SEA
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 19:05 TOI · +1
J. Eberle
#7 · R · SEA
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 17:31 TOI
C. Bedard
#98 · C · CHI
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 23:12 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • SEA won despite being outplayed by xG (44%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
  • J. Daccord (SEA) stopped 3.5 goals above expected.
  • SEA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 18 rush chances.
  • SEA created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CHI created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CHI underperformed xG by 3.5 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Daccord (SEA) saved 3.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • J. Daccord was a wall on HD chances — 90% SV on 10 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CHI at SEA · 10:00 PM ET

The Kraken are the model's lean over the Blackhawks on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 11, 2:27 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

56%
SEA
Model favorite
44%
56%
CHI50SEA

SEA by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score CHI 2.32.7 SEA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CHI← edge
edge →SEA
42.0%5v5 xG%46.0%
46.0%Corsi%45.0%
2.17xGF / 602.13
2.94xGA / 602.51
1.84Goals for / gm1.87
2.41Goals against / gm1.95
0.996PDO — luck, not skill1.011

SEA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.996 vs 1.011) says SEA has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a CHI 2.3–2.7 SEA game with the Kraken at 56% win probability. Seattle's edge lives in 5v5 play: they generate 46.0% of expected goals compared to Chicago's 42.0%, though the Blackhawks hold a marginal Corsi% advantage at 46.0% to 45.0%. The Kraken's luck metrics (PDO of 1.011 vs. 0.996) suggest their shooting efficiency has run hot—a factor that compounds their underlying play advantage.

Chicago's scoring depends on Tyler Bertuzzi and Connor Bedard. Bertuzzi carries the load with 0.85 xG/60 and 20 goals, including 7 from high-danger areas, at an 18.0% shooting rate. Bedard's 0.82 xG/60 and 11.8% shooting rate, paired with his 27 assists, make him harder to shut down—he's generating volume in dangerous areas but at lower conversion. Both are Seattle's primary targets on the forecheck.

Seattle counters with Shane Wright and Berkly Catton. Wright produces 0.77 xG/60 with a 10.4% shooting rate, suggesting volume creation without elite finishing, while Catton's lower volume (0.68 xG/60) but higher efficiency (8.8%) makes him a secondary threat Chicago can't ignore. Wright has 8 goals this season; Catton has 6.

Chicago's defensive structure centers on Anton Frondell as a weak link. Seattle's Chandler Stephenson occupies the same role. Both teams carry 0% high-danger goal rates and 0% rebound goal rates.

The prediction hinges on Seattle sustaining its xG% edge through sixty minutes. Chicago has the individual talent to steal this one if Bertuzzi and Bedard execute, but the underlying play model is unambiguous: the Kraken are the cleaner team.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters