Motion-blurred skater in a Carolina Hurricanes sweater
Breakdown · CAR at NYR

Hurricanes shut out the Rangers, 3-0

The verdict · earned

The Hurricanes earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

CAR 3 · NYR 0
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 2:33 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Kochetkov stole this game—he saved 2.48 goals above expected. The 3-0 scoreline flatters neither team's underlying economics: Carolina owned 60% of 5v5 expected goals (3.67–2.48), but New York squandered quality chances into a shutout.

The Rangers held 45% of shot attempts (26–32 on goal), matching their 40% xG share. High-danger looks favored Carolina 6–3. New York created three rebound opportunities and crashed the net effectively; they simply couldn't convert. Carolina failed to convert four rebound chances but profited from two low-danger finishes that goalies don't stop regularly.

Seth Jarvis's wrist shot from the slot (third period, 18:21) sealed it—the kind of secondary chance that tilts close games. S. Walker led with 1 goal and 1 assist through 24:16, the night's most dangerous Hurricanes forward. M. Reilly added an assist in 18:01.

Igor Shesterkin saved 1.67 goals above expected, solid work on a night his team generated fewer chances and couldn't capitalize. Carolina's goaltending won the variance game entirely.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Nov 4
CAR
3
NYR
0

Hurricanes shut out the Rangers, 3-0

Chances 3.7 – 2.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Hurricanes earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
CAR
3.67
NYR
2.48
60% of the chances40%

The board read CAR 3, NYR 0. The chances read CAR 3.7, NYR 2.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
CAR
−0.7
goals above expected
CAR3.67 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR2.48 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Rangers left 2.5 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 13:30CARN. EhlersPP1–0
  2. P2 17:07CARS. Walker2–0
  3. P3 18:21CARS. JarvisEN3–0
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
CAR
49 shots
3
Final
88 shots
NYR
39 shots
0
CAR attackNYR attack
CAR NYR Goal
49
shots · 3 in
39
shots · 0 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
CARNYR
1 / 6
1.95 xG
High danger
0 / 3
0.59 xG
0 / 10
0.91 xG
Medium
0 / 11
1.30 xG
2 / 50
0.81 xG
Low
0 / 43
0.60 xG

The Rangers went 0 for 3 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
P. Kochetkov
+2.5
CAR · 26/26
A
I. Shesterkin
+1.7
NYR · 29/31
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Hurricanes shut out the Rangers, 3-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 13–15
  1. 13:30CARN. Ehlerspower play(S. Walker, S. Aho)1–0
2ndshots 13–10
  1. 17:07CARS. Walker(M. Reilly, M. Jankowski)2–0
3rdshots 6–1
  1. 18:21CARS. Jarvisempty net3–0

score reads CAR–NYR

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.67
CAR chances
Goals their shots were worth
−0.7
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.046
CAR puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
53.7%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.67Expected goals2.48
CAR 60% of the chance quality
32Shots on goal26
6High-danger chances3
66All attempts (Corsi)57
Adjusted for score: CAR 50% · NYR 50%
Faceoffs · NYR won50%off25%neu56%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CAR1 / 6 · 1.95 xG
NYR0 / 3 · 0.59 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CAR0 / 10 · 0.91 xG
NYR0 / 11 · 1.30 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CAR2 / 50 · 0.81 xG
NYR0 / 43 · 0.60 xG

NYR went 0-for-11 from medium danger on 1.30 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CAR
3 G · 3.67 xG · -0.7
NYR
0 G · 2.48 xG · -2.5
01234

CAR finished -0.7 against expected, NYR -2.5.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CAR
WRIST2/23
SNAP1/11
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/6
BACKHAND0/4
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/17
NYR
WRIST0/22
SNAP0/6
TIP IN0/6
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/18
CAR
NYR
Off the rush
1 G on 23
2.38 xG
0 G on 20
1.42 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4
0.73 xG
0 G on 3
0.49 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CAR went 2-for-23, NYR 0-for-22.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
P. Kochetkov
CAR · 26/26 · 1.000
+2.5
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/30.6+0.6
Medium0/111.3+1.3
Low0/430.6+0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

I. Shesterkin
NYR · 29/31 · .935
+1.7
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/61.9+0.9
Medium0/100.9+0.9
Low2/500.8-1.2

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

88 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
CAR
49 shots
3
Final
88 shots
NYR
39 shots
0
CAR attackNYR attack
CAR NYR Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — CAR left, NYR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Walker
#26 · D · CAR
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 24:16 on ice · +1
S. Jarvis
#24 · R · CAR
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 18:43 on ice · +1
M. Reilly
#6 · D · CAR
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 18:01 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Tue, Nov 4
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 2:32 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects the Hurricanes to win 55% of the time in this matchup, with a projected final of 2.7–2.4 Carolina. The edge is real, but built partly on unsustainable luck.

The Hurricanes own the underlying play. They're generating 56.0% of expected goals at 5v5 against a Rangers team sitting at 48.0%. The territorial advantage is even starker: Carolina's Corsi sits at 60.0%, an 11-point spread that suggests the Hurricanes will spend most of the night in the offensive zone. This is not randomness—it's dominance of the puck.

But here's the catch: Carolina's PDO sits at 0.984, meaning they're running cold. When a team is out-shooting its expected goal share this badly, regression is inevitable. The Rangers, conversely, sit at 1.009, which can't last either. The Hurricanes are the team more likely to benefit from positive regression.

New York enters this game with structural problems. The Rangers are −6 in goal differential over their last 10 games, indicating not just losing, but getting out-played while doing it. On the road against a possession-dominant opponent, this is a significant vulnerability.

Jackson Blake leads the Hurricanes at 1.06 expected goals per 60 minutes, with 14 goals and 19 assists. Two of those goals are high-danger chances, and his 10.9% shooting rate leaves room for improvement. Seth Jarvis sits slightly lower at 0.98 xG/60 but has 17 goals with an elite 11.9% shooting rate and only 1 high-danger goal, meaning his production has outpaced his underlying play. That gap will compress.

For the Rangers, Adam Sykora has posted just 3 goals on a preposterous 20.0% shooting rate from 0.91 xG/60—he's massively overperforming and a prime candidate for negative regression. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8G 11A) offers more sustainable output, though his 13.1% shooting rate also hints at fortune.

Carolina's weakness is on the blue line, where Charles Alexis Legault is exposed defensively. New York can target Vincent Iorio in a similar capacity, though both teams' underlying shot quality has suppressed high-danger scoring.

The Hurricanes' possession edge, combined with PDO regression tailwinds, makes them the clear lean. The Rangers' recent form adds urgency—this is not a bounce-back spot in their schedule.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

CAR 55%
55%
CAR
Model favorite
55%
45%
CAR50NYR

CAR by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score CAR 2.7–2.4 NYR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
CAR← edge
edge →NYR
56.0%48.0%
60.0%49.0%
2.982.26
2.312.40
2.261.88
1.951.90
0.9841.009

CAR holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.984 vs 1.009) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
CAR
6-4-0
+6 GD · 3d rest
NYR
4-4-2
-6 GD · 2d rest
0.984
CAR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.009
NYR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Hurricanes own the underlying play — 56.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • The Hurricanes drive Corsi at 60.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Hurricanes' PDO is 0.984 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Hurricanes own the underlying play — 56.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • The Hurricanes drive Corsi at 60.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • The Rangers are underwater at -6 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Hurricanes' PDO is 0.984 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
CAR
Expected in goal
F. Andersen
3 days rest.909 last start
Backup Brandon Bussi · +2.8 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NYR
Expected in goal
I. Shesterkin
2 days rest.846 last start
Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
CAR
Jackson Blake14G 19A
1.06 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.9% sh
Seth Jarvis17G 12A
0.98 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.9% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Keep going

Where to next