Mammoth run the Sabres off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Mammoth earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Mammoth's 2-1 overtime victory aligned with the underlying metrics—they controlled 70% of 5v5 expected goals (4.36 to 1.87) and held high-danger chances 4 to 2. Yet Utah's waste tempered the margin: they underperformed their xG by 2.36 goals despite that dominance. A. Lyon (BUF) saved 33 of 35 shots at a 0.943 SV% while posting 2.36 goals above expected—the difference between Utah's shot-quality advantage and the final score. Buffalo managed 34% of shot attempts (18 to 35) and scored once on 1.87 xG, underperforming by 0.87 goals. Utah converted 2 of 33 rush chances; Clayton Keller's wrist shot from the slot at 00:47 of overtime provided the decisive exception.
The danger ladder
UTA went 1-for-22 from medium danger on 2.54 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
UTA finished -2.4 against expected, BUF -0.9 — A. Lyon (BUF) saved 2.4 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: UTA went 1-for-25, BUF 0-for-14. UTA scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- A. Lyon (BUF) stopped 2.4 goals above expected.
- UTA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 33 rush chances.
- BUF created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- UTA created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- UTA underperformed xG by 2.4 — wasted quality chances.
- A. Lyon (BUF) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.