Backcheck
Recap · FLA at LAK

Panthers pull away from the Kings

The Panthers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.55–2.78 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 2:58 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
FLA
Florida Panthers
5
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.55Expected goals2.78
52% share for the better side
24Shot attempts (SOG)26
2High-danger chances5
51Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 47% / 53%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Panthers beat the Kings 5–2, but the underlying numbers suggest this was a closer contest than the scoreboard. Expected goals finished 2.78–2.55 in Los Angeles' favor. The Panthers' win came from elite finishing: they overperformed their xG by 2.45 goals.

Los Angeles controlled the run of play. They held 52% of shot attempts (26–24 on goal) and won the high-danger chances 5–2. Yet they scored just two goals. Goaltender A. Forsberg surrendered 19 saves on 24 shots (0.792 SV%), underperforming his expected mark by 2.45 goals—a historically bad night.

The Panthers' performance was its mirror image. S. Bobrovsky made 24 saves on 26 shots (0.923 SV%), outperforming expected by 0.78. More importantly, Florida capitalized ruthlessly. They scored four goals on 24 rush chances while the Kings managed two on 20. Brad Marchand's snap shot from the high slot in the third period (12:36) proved decisive.

The variance tells the story: Florida's 2.45-goal overperformance nearly equals the final margin. Strip out the goaltending collapse and elite shooting touch, and this becomes a one-goal game—reflecting what the underlying metrics called.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
FLA1 / 2 · 0.54 xG
LAK1 / 5 · 1.16 xG
Medium dangermid-range
FLA4 / 13 · 1.53 xG
LAK1 / 13 · 1.20 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
FLA0 / 36 · 0.48 xG
LAK0 / 33 · 0.43 xG

FLA went 4-for-13 from medium danger on 1.53 expected goals — 2.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
FLA
5 G · 2.55 xG · +2.5
LAK
2 G · 2.78 xG · -0.8
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. BobrovskyFLA
+0.8
A. ForsbergLAK
-2.4

FLA finished +2.5 against expected, LAK -0.8 — A. Forsberg (LAK) allowed 2.4 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
FLA
WRIST3/25
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND1/5
SLAP0/0
SNAP1/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/17
LAK
WRIST1/24
TIP IN1/4
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/4
SNAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/15
FLA
LAK
Off the rush
4 G on 24 · 2.11 xG
2 G on 20 · 2.23 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.27 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.22 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: FLA went 3-for-25, LAK 1-for-24. FLA scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
N. Mikkola
#77 · D · FLA
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 19:26 TOI · +3
B. Marchand
#63 · L · FLA
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 15:08 TOI · +1
A. Ekblad
#5 · D · FLA
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 22:31 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Forsberg (LAK) gave up 2.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • FLA was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • FLA outperformed their expected goals by 2.5 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · FLA at LAK · 10:00 PM ET

Panthers at Kings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 2:56 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
LAK
Model favorite
45%
55%
FLA50LAK

LAK by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score FLA 2.32.6 LAK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

FLA← edge
edge →LAK
49.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
52.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.48xGF / 602.42
2.56xGA / 602.20
1.98Goals for / gm1.85
2.21Goals against / gm1.71
0.989PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.989 vs 1.002) says LAK has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.3–2.6 game with the Kings at 55% win probability — about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Los Angeles enters as the hotter team, going 5–2–3 in their last 10 games. Florida, meanwhile, is underwater at -13 goal differential over that span.

At 5v5, Los Angeles owns the underlying play with a 52.0% expected goal share against Florida's 49.0%. Both teams post identical Corsi rates of 52.0%, but Los Angeles' PDO of 1.002 edges Florida's 0.989.

Both teams have goalies on back-to-backs. D. Kuemper and S. Bobrovsky could be fresh backups or fatigued starters — monitor the pregame lineups.

For Florida, Sam Bennett drives the offense at 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes with 18 goals and 19 assists. Brad Marchand provides secondary firepower at 0.93 xG/60, adding 17 goals and 9 assists. Los Angeles counters with Alex Laferriere at 0.87 xG/60 and 16 goals with 18 assists, while Jared Wright anchors playmaking at 0 goals and 4 assists.

The Kings have the edge in form and underlying metrics, but the margins are thin. Call it a coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters