Backcheck
Recap · NSH at NYR

Rangers pull away from the Predators

The Rangers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.63–2.43 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:25 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NSH
Nashville Predators
3
Home
NYR
New York Rangers
6
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.63Expected goals2.43
60% share for the better side
30Shot attempts (SOG)18
4High-danger chances5
58Corsi (all attempts)35
Score-adjusted: 68% / 33%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Rangers stole this game. They won 6-3 despite surrendering 60% of expected goals (3.63 to 2.43)—the Predators were the better team and lost anyway. This is what happens when one goalie is hot and one is cold.

New York controlled little on the ice: 38% of shot attempts, 40% of xG. But they punished what they got. The Rangers scored on 5 of 17 rush attempts—clinical finishing that ends games. I. Shesterkin went 27-for-30 (0.900 SV%, +0.63 vs expected) to keep New York afloat.

Nashville was the better team. They generated 60% of xG, created 6 rebound opportunities, and got three goals from M. Wood in just over 17 minutes of ice time. But they ran into J. Saros's collapse: 7-for-12 (0.583 SV%, -3.38 vs expected). A historic underperformance in net swallowed the Predators' effort.

The Rangers overperformed their xG by 3.57 goals—an extreme variance swing that usually doesn't hold. This was a bouncy game where New York cashed in and Nashville didn't, made possible by goaltending and timing rather than dominance.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH1 / 4 · 1.00 xG
NYR1 / 5 · 1.10 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH1 / 17 · 2.04 xG
NYR3 / 8 · 0.93 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH1 / 37 · 0.59 xG
NYR2 / 22 · 0.40 xG

NYR went 3-for-8 from medium danger on 0.93 expected goals — 2.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
3 G · 3.63 xG · -0.6
NYR
6 G · 2.43 xG · +3.6
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. AnnunenNSH
-0.2
J. SarosNSH
-3.4
I. ShesterkinNYR
+0.6

NSH finished -0.6 against expected, NYR +3.6 — J. Saros (NSH) allowed 3.4 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
WRIST1/30
SNAP1/6
SLAP1/6
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/1
OTHER0/12
NYR
WRIST3/17
SNAP1/4
SLAP1/2
BACKHAND1/3
TIP IN0/3
OTHER0/6
NSH
NYR
Off the rush
2 G on 27 · 2.37 xG
5 G on 17 · 1.82 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 6 · 0.97 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.19 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NSH went 1-for-30, NYR 3-for-17. NYR scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Wood
#71 · R · NSH
3 G · 0 A · 6 SOG · 17:09 TOI
A. Lafrenière
#13 · L · NYR
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 15:09 TOI · +3
A. Fox
#23 · D · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 20:24 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYR won despite being outplayed by xG (40%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
  • J. Saros (NSH) gave up 3.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NYR scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 17 rush chances.
  • NSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • NSH created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR outperformed their expected goals by 3.6 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • NSH power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 15 PP shots (1.43 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NSH at NYR · 7:00 PM ET

Predators at Rangers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 3:24 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
NYR
Model favorite
48%
52%
NSH50NYR

NYR by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NSH 2.42.5 NYR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NSH← edge
edge →NYR
49.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
50.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.48xGF / 602.26
2.58xGA / 602.40
1.84Goals for / gm1.88
2.21Goals against / gm1.90
0.992PDO — luck, not skill1.009

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (0.992 vs 1.009) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects 2.4 goals for Nashville and 2.5 for New York, with the Rangers holding 52% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Both teams arrive injured. The Rangers are minus-7 in goal differential over their last 10; Nashville is minus-8. Neither has the form to tip the scale.

Underlying metrics show the gap isn't there. Nashville owns 49.0% expected goals share and 50.0% Corsi at 5v5, while New York sits at 48.0% and 49.0%. But the Rangers' PDO of 1.009 suggests they're outscoring their looks, while Nashville's 0.992 indicates the opposite. One team will eventually regress.

I. Shesterkin is on a back-to-back, complicating New York's backstop.

For Nashville, Zachary L'Heureux remains the primary threat: 0.85 expected goals per 60 minutes on a 16.0% shooting rate, yielding four goals. Filip Forsberg brings volume instead — 23 goals on 0.80 xG/60, a 13.6% conversion rate. Forsberg carries four high-danger goals; L'Heureux has one.

New York counters with Adam Sykora, the most dangerous per-minute producer at 0.91 xG/60 but severely underperforming at three goals on 20.0% shooting. Gabe Perreault offers balance: 0.79 xG/60 spread across eight goals and 11 assists, with two high-danger goals and a 13.1% shooting rate that tracks closer to expectation.

Jonathan Marchessault is Nashville's defensive weak point; Vincent Iorio is New York's pressure valve.

This game hinges on which team's expected-goal profile finally catches its goal total. Without momentum, without goaltending advantage, without a clear structural edge, it's a flip. The Rangers' 52% reflects minimal conviction — and that's the whole story.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters