Backcheck
Recap · DAL at OTT

Stars edge the Senators in overtime

The Stars stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.90–3.26 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:30 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DAL
Dallas Stars
3
Home
OTT
Ottawa Senators
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.90Expected goals3.26
53% share for the better side
33Shot attempts (SOG)29
4High-danger chances5
57Corsi (all attempts)50
Score-adjusted: 57% / 43%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Ottawa dominated the underlying metrics—3.26 expected goals to Dallas's 2.90, plus a slight edge on shot attempts—yet lost 3–2 in overtime. Elite goaltending and opportunistic execution decided it.

J. Oettinger was the difference. His 0.931 save percentage against 27 shots means he stopped 1.26 goals above expected, turning a competitive xG battle into a Dallas victory. Ottawa's breakdown came where it mattered most: they scored zero goals on five high-danger chances, while Oettinger was 5-for-5 on HD attempts.

Both teams exploited the rush identically. Ottawa converted twice on 26 rush attempts; Dallas scored twice on 22. The rebound game told a similar story: the Senators crashed hard and generated three rebound chances without capitalizing, while Dallas created four opportunities and converted one. None of this separated the teams—it was Oettinger's elite positioning and Ottawa's finishing collapse that did.

Roope Hintz ended it at 03:04 of overtime with a wrist shot from the doorstep—an overtime winner that epitomized Dallas's efficiency in a game where underlying numbers suggested neither team should have pulled away.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DAL1 / 4 · 0.78 xG
OTT0 / 5 · 1.01 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DAL1 / 13 · 1.42 xG
OTT1 / 14 · 1.74 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DAL1 / 40 · 0.69 xG
OTT1 / 31 · 0.50 xG

OTT went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.01 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DAL
3 G · 2.90 xG · +0.1
OTT
2 G · 3.26 xG · -1.3
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. OettingerDAL
+1.3
L. UllmarkOTT
-0.1

DAL finished +0.1 against expected, OTT -1.3 — J. Oettinger (DAL) saved 1.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DAL
WRIST2/32
BACKHAND0/2
TIP IN0/4
SNAP1/4
SLAP0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/15
OTT
WRIST2/21
BACKHAND0/7
TIP IN0/4
SNAP0/3
SLAP0/4
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/10
DAL
OTT
Off the rush
2 G on 22 · 1.82 xG
2 G on 26 · 2.55 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4 · 0.62 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.49 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: DAL went 2-for-32, OTT 2-for-21. DAL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Robertson
#21 · L · DAL
1 G · 2 A · 6 SOG · 20:11 TOI · +1
M. Heiskanen
#4 · D · DAL
0 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 28:50 TOI · +2
M. Rantanen
#96 · R · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 21:43 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Oettinger (DAL) stopped 1.3 goals above expected.
  • OTT couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • OTT created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DAL created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • J. Oettinger was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DAL at OTT · 7:00 PM ET

The Senators are the model's lean over the Stars — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 3:28 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

56%
OTT
Model favorite
44%
56%
DAL50OTT

OTT by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score DAL 2.22.6 OTT; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DAL← edge
edge →OTT
51.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
47.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.36xGF / 602.66
2.29xGA / 602.12
2.07Goals for / gm2.18
1.68Goals against / gm1.99
1.024PDO — luck, not skill0.993

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.024 vs 0.993) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects Ottawa at 56% win probability in a 2.2–2.6 loss for Dallas. The Senators hold the underlying play edge that makes the ask reasonable.

Ottawa owns 56.0% of expected goals at 5v5 to Dallas' 51.0%, with a territorial advantage reflected in 53.0% Corsi. The gap isn't massive, but it's consistent—the Senators dictate where play happens.

Dallas' PDO sits at 1.024, running well above the league mean. Regression is the predictable risk here; when luck normalizes, their goal totals tighten. Ottawa's 0.993 PDO suggests they haven't been rescued by random variance the same way.

Both starting goaltenders are on back-to-backs. L. Meriläinen and C. DeSmith may see reduced minutes or backup rotation, a minor edge to neither team but worth tracking given the competitive nature of the matchup.

On paper, Jason Robertson (25G, 0.96 xG/60, 12.4% shooting) remains Dallas' primary threat, with 2 high-danger goals anchoring his season. Michael Bunting (8G, 0.83 xG/60, 7.6% shooting) offers secondary scoring depth. For Ottawa, Brady Tkachuk (11G, 1.19 xG/60, 7.5% shooting) leads the xG generation with 2 high-danger goals, while Dylan Cozens (13G, 1.00 xG/60, 9.5% shooting, 1 high-danger goal) delivers consistent offensive pressure.

Dallas has struggled converting high-danger chances into both goals and rebounds—both metrics sitting at 0%, a real constraint on ceiling. Tyler Myers represents a defensive liability worth testing. Ottawa faces a similar conversion problem at 0% HD and rebound rates, with Nick Jensen as the defensive weak point. When both teams struggle to finish, the team generating more chances wins the attrition game. On 5v5 xG%, that's Ottawa.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters