Backcheck
Recap · NYR at CBJ

I. Shesterkin stands tall as the Rangers edge the Blue Jackets

The Rangers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.31–3.63 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 4:42 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
2
Home
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
1
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.31Expected goals3.63
52% share for the better side
33Shot attempts (SOG)27
4High-danger chances4
77Corsi (all attempts)56
Score-adjusted: 57% / 43%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Columbus built a stronger offense on paper—3.63 expected goals versus New York's 3.31—yet lost 2-1 in a shootout. The underlying game was close; high-danger chances split 4-4, but the Jackets' shot quality was sharper: 0.065 expected goals per shot versus 0.043 for the Rangers.

New York won the shot-attempt count, 33-27, but that margin masks what Columbus did better—generating fewer, deadlier chances. The Jackets crashed the net hard, creating four rebound opportunities and converting one. They wasted it anyway, underperforming their xG by 2.63 goals. The Rangers underperformed theirs by 1.31.

I. Shesterkin was the difference. The Rangers goalie posted a 0.963 save percentage on 27 shots and outperformed his expected output by 2.63 goals—stealing this game when his team's offense couldn't. J. Greaves kept Columbus in it with a 0.970 save percentage, besting his expected mark by 2.31 goals, but it wasn't enough.

J.T. Miller ended it. His shootout snap shot from a sharp angle gave New York the margin the underlying play didn't.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR1 / 4 · 0.84 xG
CBJ1 / 4 · 0.88 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR0 / 14 · 1.54 xG
CBJ0 / 19 · 2.14 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR0 / 59 · 0.93 xG
CBJ0 / 33 · 0.62 xG

CBJ went 0-for-19 from medium danger on 2.14 expected goals — 2.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
2 G · 3.31 xG · -1.3
CBJ
1 G · 3.63 xG · -2.6
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. ShesterkinNYR
+2.6
J. GreavesCBJ
+2.3

NYR finished -1.3 against expected, CBJ -2.6 — I. Shesterkin (NYR) saved 2.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST1/32
SNAP0/9
TIP IN0/4
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/4
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/21
CBJ
WRIST0/22
SNAP0/5
TIP IN1/8
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
OTHER0/13
NYR
CBJ
Off the rush
0 G on 31 · 2.13 xG
0 G on 28 · 2.26 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.43 xG
1 G on 4 · 0.49 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-32, CBJ 0-for-22.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Fox
#23 · D · NYR
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 28:38 TOI
Z. Werenski
#8 · D · CBJ
0 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 27:18 TOI
K. Marchenko
#86 · R · CBJ
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 22:41 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • I. Shesterkin (NYR) stopped 2.6 goals above expected.
  • CBJ generated far more dangerous chances — 0.065 xG/shot vs 0.043. Quality over quantity.
  • CBJ created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CBJ underperformed xG by 2.6 — wasted quality chances.
  • NYR underperformed xG by 2.3 — wasted quality chances.
  • I. Shesterkin (NYR) saved 2.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • J. Greaves (CBJ) saved 2.3 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at CBJ · 7:00 PM ET

The Blue Jackets are the model's lean over the Rangers on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 11, 4:14 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
CBJ
Model favorite
45%
55%
NYR50CBJ

CBJ by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.32.6 CBJ; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →CBJ
48.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
49.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.26xGF / 602.63
2.40xGA / 602.43
1.88Goals for / gm2.12
1.90Goals against / gm1.98
1.009PDO — luck, not skill1.003

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.009 vs 1.003) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects this matchup at 2.3–2.6 goals, with the Blue Jackets favored at 55% win probability. The underlying numbers explain why. Columbus controls the 5v5 play decisively: 52.0% expected goals versus 48.0% for New York, a gap that also shows up in possession (51.0% Corsi% to 49.0%). The Rangers' slight PDO edge (1.009 to 1.003) isn't enough to offset the underlying deficit.

The goaltending situation deserves scrutiny. J. Greaves enters on a back-to-back, which could mean either a backup start or a fatigued starter.

Columbus's group is dangerous in the right ways. Boone Jenner leads with 11 goals and 0.98 expected goals per 60 minutes, including two high-danger goals at a 9.6% shooting rate. Mathieu Olivier adds 12 goals and 0.89 xG/60, with one high-danger goal at 13.3% shooting. New York's Adam Sykora has 3 goals and 0.91 xG/60 despite zero high-danger goals, at 20.0% shooting; Gabe Perreault (8 goals, 0.79 xG/60, two high-danger goals, 13.1% shooting) offers secondary depth.

Both teams lack a high-danger goal rate or rebound goal rate (0% each), but Columbus's underlying edge in shot volume and quality should prove decisive. New York's defensive weak link is Vincent Iorio; Columbus's is Conor Garland. The model's lean reflects a fundamental advantage in the play itself.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters