Motion-blurred skater in a Detroit Red Wings sweater
Breakdown · DET at NYR

Red Wings run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Red Wings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

DET 2 · NYR 1
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 4:24 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Red Wings won 2-1, a scoreline that masked their dominance. Detroit controlled 66% of 5v5 expected goals (5.69–2.87), holding the Rangers to 31% of shot attempts (19–42). Both teams underperformed their xG, but J. Quick's save rate (0.952, +3.69 vs expected) was the only reason New York stayed close.

Detroit faced the cleaner looks: 10 high-danger chances to New York's 4, with superior shot quality of 0.075 xG per attempt versus 0.049. Yet Detroit still underperformed, leaving 3.69 expected goals unscored. New York left 1.87 on the table—a severe miss.

C. Talbot (0.947 SV%, +1.87 vs expected) anchored Detroit's advantage. Quick's 90% save percentage on 10 high-danger shots kept the deficit from growing. He posted the more impressive statistical performance, yet the Red Wings won the game.

Detroit's net-front play created eight rebound opportunities and converted one. New York generated no offensive momentum and squandered quality chances. The turning point came in the third period: Lucas Raymond's wrist shot from the high slot at 16:13.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Nov 16
DET
2
NYR
1

Red Wings run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 5.7 – 2.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Red Wings earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
DET
5.69
NYR
2.87
67% of the chances34%

The board read DET 2, NYR 1. The chances read DET 5.7, NYR 2.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
DET
−3.7
goals above expected
DET5.69 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR2.87 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Rangers left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 09:30DETA. DeBrincatPP1–0
  2. P2 11:59NYRM. ZibanejadPP1–1
  3. P3 16:13DETL. Raymond2–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
DET
57 shots
2
Final
93 shots
NYR
36 shots
1
DET attackNYR attack
DET NYR Goal
57
shots · 2 in
36
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
DETNYR
1 / 10
2.90 xG
High danger
0 / 4
0.99 xG
1 / 17
1.91 xG
Medium
1 / 16
1.61 xG
0 / 49
0.89 xG
Low
0 / 39
0.27 xG

The Rangers went 0 for 4 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Quick
+3.7
NYR · 40/42
A
C. Talbot
+1.9
DET · 18/19
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Red Wings run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 9–6no goals
    2ndshots 19–10
    1. 09:30DETA. DeBrincatpower play(L. Raymond, P. Kane)1–0
    2. 11:59NYRM. Zibanejadpower play(W. Cuylle, A. Panarin)1–1
    3rdshots 14–3
    1. 16:13DETL. Raymond(D. Larkin, M. Seider)2–1

    score reads DET–NYR

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    5.69
    DET chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −3.7
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.009
    DET puck luck
    About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
    56.3%
    Shot attempts
    Over half — they had the puck more
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    5.69Expected goals2.87
    DET 67% of the chance quality
    42Shots on goal19
    10High-danger chances4
    76All attempts (Corsi)59
    Adjusted for score: DET 56% · NYR 44%
    Faceoffs · NYR won36%off46%neu39%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    DET1 / 10 · 2.90 xG
    NYR0 / 4 · 0.99 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    DET1 / 17 · 1.91 xG
    NYR1 / 16 · 1.61 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    DET0 / 49 · 0.89 xG
    NYR0 / 39 · 0.27 xG

    DET went 1-for-10 from high danger on 2.90 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    DET
    2 G · 5.69 xG · -3.7
    NYR
    1 G · 2.87 xG · -1.9
    0123456

    DET finished -3.7 against expected, NYR -1.9.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    DET
    WRIST2/39
    SNAP0/8
    SLAP0/5
    BACKHAND0/4
    TIP IN0/0
    DEFLECTED0/1
    POKE0/0
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    OTHER0/19
    NYR
    WRIST1/10
    SNAP0/7
    SLAP0/9
    BACKHAND0/4
    TIP IN0/3
    DEFLECTED0/1
    POKE0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    OTHER0/23
    DET
    NYR
    Off the rush
    1 G on 31
    2.96 xG
    1 G on 22
    2.31 xG
    Off rebounds
    1 G on 8
    1.32 xG
    0 G on 1
    0.09 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: DET went 2-for-39, NYR 1-for-10.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    C. Talbot
    DET · 18/19 · .947
    +1.9
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/41.0+1.0
    Medium1/161.6+0.6
    Low0/390.3+0.3

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Quick
    NYR · 40/42 · .952
    +3.7
    saved above expected
    A+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/102.9+1.9
    Medium1/171.9+0.9
    Low0/490.9+0.9

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    93 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    DET
    57 shots
    2
    Final
    93 shots
    NYR
    36 shots
    1
    DET attackNYR attack
    DET NYR Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — DET left, NYR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    L. Raymond
    #23 · L · DET
    1 G · 1 A · 7 SOG · 20:22 on ice · +1
    M. Seider
    #53 · D · DET
    0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 22:22 on ice
    D. Larkin
    #71 · C · DET
    0 G · 1 A · 7 SOG · 21:49 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Sun, Nov 16
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 4:42 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The Rangers are favored at 52% win probability—barely. The model projects a 2.4–2.5 game, close enough that a coin flip would make as much sense.

    Detroit arrives with a minus-6 goal differential over its last 10 games, a sign its recent play has unraveled. At 5v5, the teams are statistical twins: both at 49.0% Corsi, with Detroit holding 49.0% xG and New York at 48.0%. Where they split is PDO—Detroit's 0.985 versus New York's 1.009—a polite way of saying the Rangers have had the puck bounce their way.

    The margin is too thin to find an edge in volume, so execution becomes everything. Alex DeBrincat powers Detroit at 0.88 expected goals per 60 with 17 goals and 28 assists; his 9.0% shooting rate and two high-danger goals show he's been both effective and fortunate. Marco Kasper (0.81 xG/60, 7 goals, 8 assists) operates at a lower shooting percentage of 6.1%, suggesting he's been snakebitten with room to run.

    New York's offense reads differently. Adam Sykora has 3 goals on 0.91 xG/60 and a 20.0% shooting percentage—a gap that points to either mounting frustration or a breakout waiting to happen. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8 goals, 11 assists) is New York's more reliable scoring presence at 13.1% shooting. Both teams sit at 0% on high-danger and rebound-goal rates, which suggests either elite goaltending or collective mediocrity in finish.

    Detroit's defensive liability is Axel Sandin-Pellikka. New York's is Vincent Iorio. In a game this even, one lapse from either side becomes the difference.

    Players to Watch

    DET

    • Alex DeBrincat — 0.88 xG/60, 17G 28A, 2 HD goals, 9.0% shooting
    • Marco Kasper — 0.81 xG/60, 7G 8A, 1 HD goals, 6.1% shooting

    NYR

    • Adam Sykora — 0.91 xG/60, 3G 1A, 20.0% shooting
    • Gabe Perreault — 0.79 xG/60, 8G 11A, 2 HD goals, 13.1% shooting

    Data: MoneyPuck 5v5 models, NHL API

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    NYR 52%
    52%
    NYR
    Model favorite
    48%
    52%
    DET50NYR

    NYR by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score DET 2.4–2.5 NYR; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    DET← edge
    edge →NYR
    49.0%48.0%
    49.0%49.0%
    2.382.26
    2.502.40
    1.731.88
    2.071.90
    0.9851.009

    NYR holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.985 vs 1.009) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    DET
    5-5-0
    -6 GD · 2d rest
    NYR
    6-3-1
    +1 GD · 3d rest
    0.985
    DET PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.009
    NYR PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Things to watch
    • The Red Wings are underwater at -6 goal differential over their last 10.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    DET
    Expected in goal
    J. Gibson
    2 days rest.882 last start
    Backup John Gibson · +11.7 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    NYR
    Expected in goal
    I. Shesterkin
    3 days rest.917 last start
    Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    DET
    Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
    0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
    Marco Kasper7G 8A
    0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
    NYR
    Adam Sykora3G 1A
    0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
    Gabe Perreault8G 11A
    0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next