Backcheck
Recap · LAK at WSH

Capitals hold off the Kings

The Capitals won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 4:44 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
1
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.45Expected goals3.37
51% share for the better side
31Shot attempts (SOG)25
4High-danger chances6
66Corsi (all attempts)53
Score-adjusted: 60% / 40%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Kings were the better team on paper—expected goals favored Los Angeles 3.45 to 3.37—yet the Capitals won 2–1. C. Lindgren stole this one. The Capitals' goaltender posted a 0.968 save percentage and +2.45 performance versus expected. D. Kuemper was also strong (+1.37 vs expected), but in a game that easily could have gone the other way, superior goaltending was the difference.

Los Angeles' underperformance tells the real story: 3.45 xG, 1 goal, a 2.45-goal miss. Washington squandered its own chances—0-for-6 on high-danger opportunities—yet prevailed anyway. The Capitals' efficiency on the rush (2 goals on 25 attempts) and net-front collisions papered over poor finishing in prime scoring areas. High-danger chances favored Washington 6–4, and Kuemper's perfect record on those attempts kept Los Angeles within reach until the end.

The turning point arrived early in the second: Anze Kopitar's tip-in from the doorstep at 13:27. After that, Lindgren took over.

Washington held 45% of shot attempts (25–31 on goal), losing the volume battle decisively but winning the precision war. The Capitals created 4 rebound opportunities and converted 0; the Kings created 3 and also converted 0. One team finished a high-danger chance, its goalie shut the door, and the game was decided.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
LAK0 / 4 · 0.93 xG
WSH0 / 6 · 1.51 xG
Medium dangermid-range
LAK1 / 16 · 1.82 xG
WSH2 / 11 · 1.30 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
LAK0 / 46 · 0.71 xG
WSH0 / 36 · 0.56 xG

WSH went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.51 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
LAK
1 G · 3.45 xG · -2.5
WSH
2 G · 3.37 xG · -1.4
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. KuemperLAK
+1.4
C. LindgrenWSH
+2.4

LAK finished -2.5 against expected, WSH -1.4 — C. Lindgren (WSH) saved 2.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
LAK
SNAP0/19
WRIST0/6
TIP IN1/6
BACKHAND0/5
SLAP0/5
DEFLECTED0/3
OTHER0/22
WSH
SNAP1/18
WRIST0/6
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP0/4
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/16
LAK
WSH
Off the rush
1 G on 32 · 2.92 xG
2 G on 25 · 2.36 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.35 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.87 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: LAK went 0-for-19, WSH 1-for-18. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Roy
#3 · D · WSH
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 22:46 TOI · +2
J. Chychrun
#6 · D · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 21:30 TOI · +2
K. Fiala
#22 · L · LAK
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 20:48 TOI · -2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Kuemper (LAK) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
  • WSH couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • WSH created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK underperformed xG by 2.5 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Kuemper was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
  • C. Lindgren (WSH) saved 2.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · LAK at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

Kings at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 4:25 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
WSH
Model favorite
50%
50%
LAK50WSH

WSH by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score LAK 2.52.5 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

LAK← edge
edge →WSH
52.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
52.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.42xGF / 602.62
2.20xGA / 602.62
1.85Goals for / gm2.18
1.71Goals against / gm1.79
1.002PDO — luck, not skill1.018

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.5 game with the Capitals at 50% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Los Angeles is the hotter team: 7-2-1 over the last 10 games versus Washington's -9 goal differential. Yet underlying metrics paint a tighter picture.

At 5v5, the Kings own 52.0% expected goals share to the Capitals' 50.0%, and a 52.0% Corsi edge over Washington's 49.0%. Territorial advantage tilts clearly to Los Angeles. But Washington is running unsustainably hot. Its PDO of 1.018 signals variance; the Kings' 1.002 sits closer to baseline.

Both L. Thompson and A. Forsberg are on back-to-backs. Watch for a backup start or tired starter from either crease.

Alex Laferriere operates at 0.87 expected goals per 60 minutes for the Kings, with 16 goals and 18 assists. His 9.9% shooting rate leaves conversion upside. Jared Wright generates 0.83 xG/60 and has 4 assists, but the supporting cast needs to produce.

Washington leans on Alex Ovechkin. At 0.97 xG/60 with 19 goals and 17 assists, his 13.8% shooting rate signals elite precision. Anthony Beauvillier adds secondary threat at 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals and 9 assists, maintaining a 10.4% shooting rate aligned with his creation.

The Kings hold structural advantage—possession edge and fresher form. Washington has the star power to punish mistakes. The model sees them as equals.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters