Motion-blurred skater in a New York Islanders sweater
Breakdown · NYI at DAL

Islanders hold off the Stars

The verdict · stolen

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.39–3.02 and won anyway.

NYI 3 · DAL 2
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 4:35 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Dallas dominated the play but lost 3–2 to New York — a 56–44% expected-goals theft. The Stars generated more high-danger chances (5 to NYI's 4), yet D. Rittich's goaltending (+1.02 vs expected) and New York's clinical finish flipped the result.

Rittich's 0.917 save percentage was the difference-maker, backstopping an Islanders team that capitalized on its opportunities. J. Oettinger (0.864 SV%, –0.61 vs expected) couldn't keep pace with Rittich's form, a goaltending gap that decided the night.

NYI's efficiency was surgical. They converted 2 of 5 high-danger chances (40%) and scored 3 goals off just 17 rush opportunities, turning transition speed into their most lethal weapon. When Dallas generated 5 rebound chances but converted zero second looks, the margin was decided.

Jason Robertson scored 2 goals, including a backhander (18:01, P3), but Dallas couldn't close out a night it controlled.


Final: NYI 3 – DAL 2

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Nov 18
NYI
3
DAL
2

Islanders hold off the Stars

Chances 2.4 – 3.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Stars deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
NYI
2.39
DAL
3.02
44% of the chances56%

The board read NYI 3, DAL 2. The chances read NYI 2.4, DAL 3.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYI
+0.6
goals above expected
NYI2.39 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
DAL3.02 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 10:31NYIC. Ritchie1–0
  2. P2 12:26DALJ. Robertson1–1
  3. P3 03:12NYIB. Horvat2–1
  4. P3 07:38NYIK. PalmieriSH3–1
  5. P3 18:01DALJ. RobertsonPP3–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYI
33 shots
3
Final
70 shots
DAL
37 shots
2
NYI attackDAL attack
NYI DAL Goal
33
shots · 3 in
37
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYIDAL
2 / 5
1.17 xG
High danger
0 / 4
0.90 xG
0 / 6
0.68 xG
Medium
2 / 12
1.56 xG
1 / 28
0.54 xG
Low
0 / 41
0.56 xG

The Stars went 0 for 4 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
D. Rittich
+1.0
NYI · 22/24
D
J. Oettinger
−0.6
DAL · 19/22
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Islanders hold off the Stars

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–10no goals
    2ndshots 5–5
    1. 10:31NYIC. Ritchie(A. Duclair, R. Pulock)1–0
    2. 12:26DALJ. Robertson(T. Seguin, M. Heiskanen)1–1
    3rdshots 7–9
    1. 03:12NYIB. Horvat(K. Palmieri, E. Heineman)2–1
    2. 07:38NYIK. Palmierishorthanded3–1
    3. 18:01DALJ. Robertsonpower play(T. Seguin, M. Rantanen)3–2

    score reads NYI–DAL

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    2.39
    NYI chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +0.6
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    1.042
    NYI puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    40.6%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    2.39Expected goals3.02
    DAL 56% of the chance quality
    22Shots on goal24
    5High-danger chances4
    39All attempts (Corsi)57
    Adjusted for score: NYI 39% · DAL 61%
    Faceoffs · DAL won69%off63%neu60%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    NYI2 / 5 · 1.17 xG
    DAL0 / 4 · 0.90 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    NYI0 / 6 · 0.68 xG
    DAL2 / 12 · 1.56 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    NYI1 / 28 · 0.54 xG
    DAL0 / 41 · 0.56 xG

    DAL went 0-for-4 from high danger on 0.90 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    NYI
    3 G · 2.39 xG · +0.6
    DAL
    2 G · 3.02 xG · -1.0
    01234

    NYI finished +0.6 against expected, DAL -1.0.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    NYI
    SNAP1/22
    SLAP1/5
    WRIST1/4
    TIP IN0/1
    BACKHAND0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    OTHER0/6
    DAL
    SNAP1/18
    SLAP0/4
    WRIST0/5
    TIP IN0/6
    BACKHAND1/3
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    OTHER0/20
    NYI
    DAL
    Off the rush
    3 G on 17
    1.19 xG
    1 G on 23
    2.21 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 5
    0.82 xG
    0 G on 1
    0.12 xG

    Snap shots carried the volume: NYI went 1-for-22, DAL 1-for-18. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    D. Rittich
    NYI · 22/24 · .917
    +1.0
    saved above expected
    B+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/40.9+0.9
    Medium2/121.6-0.4
    Low0/410.6+0.6

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Oettinger
    DAL · 19/22 · .864
    -0.6
    saved above expected
    D
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger2/51.2-0.8
    Medium0/60.7+0.7
    Low1/280.5-0.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    70 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    NYI
    33 shots
    3
    Final
    70 shots
    DAL
    37 shots
    2
    NYI attackDAL attack
    NYI DAL Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — NYI left, DAL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    J. Robertson
    #21 · L · DAL
    2 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 22:59 on ice · +1
    K. Palmieri
    #21 · C · NYI
    1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 20:02 on ice · +1
    T. Seguin
    #91 · C · DAL
    0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 17:21 on ice · +2
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Tue, Nov 18
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 4:32 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    This is about as close to a pick'em as hockey gets. The model projects a 2.4-2.7 expected goal range with Dallas at 55% win probability.

    Dallas owns the underlying play by expected goals: 51.0% xG compared to New York's 48.0%. But the Islanders claim the possession edge with 49.0% Corsi% versus Dallas's 47.0%—a reminder that shot volume and shot quality don't always align. The Stars are generating better chances despite fewer touches.

    The red flag for Dallas is sustainability. Their PDO sits at 1.024, well above the league mean, suggesting some regression is coming. When a team's luck breaks—when bounces stop going their way and goaltenders stop stealing games—that 55% projection evaporates fast. The Islanders, meanwhile, are running a 0.993 PDO, closer to neutral.

    I. Sorokin enters on the second leg of a back-to-back, which either means a tired starter or a backup getting the net. Either way, it's a wrinkle.

    At even strength, both teams generated 0% of their goals from high-danger situations and 0% on rebounds—a statistical oddity that suggests depth scoring or defensive execution has been unusually clean. That can't last, and whoever corrects first wins the game.

    The Stars lean on Jason Robertson, who has 25 goals and 21 assists while maintaining a 0.96 xG per 60 minutes at 5v5. At 12.4% shooting, he's converting at a rate that's elevated but not unsustainable. Michael Bunting (0.83 xG/60, 8 goals) gives Dallas a secondary scoring layer with an impressive 7.6% shooting rate.

    For New York, Anders Lee remains the catalyst: 1.20 xG per 60, 9 goals, 20 assists, and 2 high-danger goals despite a modest 6.4% shooting rate—meaning he's still leaving points on the board. Bo Horvat (0.87 xG/60, 18 goals, 12.8% shooting) is running hotter, with 3 high-danger goals already, and is the Islanders' most dangerous bet to cash in first.

    Alexander Romanov is New York's defensive weak link. Tyler Myers is Dallas's. Whichever side exploits first wins.

    The model is right. This is a coin flip with the coin still spinning.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    DAL 55%
    55%
    DAL
    Model favorite
    45%
    55%
    NYI50DAL

    DAL by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.4–2.7 DAL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI← edge
    edge →DAL
    48.0%51.0%
    49.0%47.0%
    2.482.36
    2.692.29
    1.782.07
    1.941.68
    0.9931.024

    DAL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.993 vs 1.024) says DAL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    NYI
    6-3-1
    +0 GD · 1d rest
    DAL
    7-1-2
    +12 GD · 2d rest
    0.993
    NYI PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.024
    DAL PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Stars own the underlying play — 51.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
    Regression watch
    • The Stars' PDO is 1.024 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Stars own the underlying play — 51.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
    • I. Sorokin is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Stars' PDO is 1.024 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    NYI
    Expected in goal
    I. Sorokin
    back-to-back.889 last start
    Backup Ilya Sorokin · +25.3 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    DAL
    Expected in goal
    J. Oettinger
    2 days rest.952 last start
    Backup Jake Oettinger · +5.7 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI
    Anders Lee9G 20A
    1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
    Bo Horvat18G 10A
    0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
    DAL
    Jason Robertson25G 21A
    0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
    Michael Bunting8G 14A
    0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next