Jets pull away from the Blue Jackets
The Jets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Winnipeg's 5-2 scoreline misleads. The Jets held 55% of 5-on-5 expected goals (3.17-2.59), insufficient to justify a three-goal margin without scoring luck. E. Merzlikins explained the gap: a 0.833 save percentage on 30 shots, 1.83 goals below expectation.
Winnipeg was clinical off the rush, converting 5 times on 29 chances. Columbus managed 2 goals on 22 rush attempts, an efficient rate that might have tightened the game if Merzlikins had held standard.
Logan Stanley's slap shot from the top of the circles (06:23, P3) provided the turning point in the third period, cementing a lead Winnipeg controlled to the end.
The danger ladder
WPG went 2-for-41 from low danger on 0.69 expected goals — 1.3 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
CBJ finished -0.6 against expected, WPG +1.8 — E. Merzlikins (CBJ) allowed 1.8 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 1-for-22, WPG 2-for-18. WPG scored 5 of theirs off the rush.
- E. Merzlikins (CBJ) gave up 1.8 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- WPG scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- WPG was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 29 rush chances.
- CBJ was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 22 rush chances.
- WPG outperformed their expected goals by 1.8 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.