Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · TOR at WSH

Capitals hold off the Maple Leafs

The verdict · earned

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

TOR 2 · WSH 4
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 6:31 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Toronto had more scoring chances and still lost. The Maple Leafs finished with 7 high-danger chances to Washington's 5, yet fell 2-4. The Capitals' control went deeper than the scoreboard — at 5v5, they held 56% of expected goals (4.25–3.40) and 61% of shot attempts (34–22).

The gap between Toronto's chances and result was pure variance. The Maple Leafs underperformed their xG by 1.40 goals while J. Woll made 30 of 33 saves (0.909 SV%, +1.25 vs expected), not enough to overcome missed opportunities. Washington capitalized on its efficiency: 2 of 5 high-danger chances (40%), two goals from the rush, and 1 converted on 4 rebound chances. Toronto managed 0 of 3 rebounds.

L. Thompson stopped 20 of 22 (0.909 SV%, +1.40 vs expected), backing a Capitals offense that converted when it counted.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Nov 28
TOR
2
WSH
4

Capitals hold off the Maple Leafs

Chances 3.4 – 4.3Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
TOR
3.40
WSH
4.25
44% of the chances56%

The board read TOR 2, WSH 4. The chances read TOR 3.4, WSH 4.3.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
−0.3
goals above expected
WSH4.25 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
TOR3.40 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 03:07TORM. Rielly1–0
  2. P2 02:49TORM. Knies2–0
  3. P2 13:18WSHC. McMichael2–1
  4. P3 13:16WSHA. Beauvillier2–2
  5. P3 16:04WSHJ. Chychrun2–3
  6. P3 19:58WSHT. WilsonEN2–4
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
TOR
38 shots
2
Final
89 shots
WSH
51 shots
4
TOR attackWSH attack
TOR WSH Goal
38
shots · 2 in
51
shots · 4 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
TORWSH
1 / 7
1.55 xG
High danger
2 / 5
1.80 xG
0 / 14
1.46 xG
Medium
2 / 17
1.65 xG
1 / 30
0.39 xG
Low
0 / 43
0.81 xG

The Capitals buried 2 of 5 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
L. Thompson
+1.4
WSH · 20/22
B+
J. Woll
+1.3
TOR · 30/33
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals hold off the Maple Leafs

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 5–10
  1. 03:07TORM. Rielly(O. Ekman-Larsson, N. Roy)1–0
2ndshots 5–13
  1. 02:49TORM. Knies(A. Matthews, T. Stecher)2–0
  2. 13:18WSHC. McMichael(A. Protas, T. Wilson)2–1
3rdshots 12–11
  1. 13:16WSHA. Beauvillier(A. Ovechkin, D. Strome)2–2
  2. 16:04WSHJ. Chychrun(R. Leonard, C. McMichael)2–3
  3. 19:58WSHT. Wilsonempty net2–4

score reads TOR–WSH

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
4.25
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
−0.3
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.022
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
56.0%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.40Expected goals4.25
WSH 56% of the chance quality
22Shots on goal34
7High-danger chances5
51All attempts (Corsi)65
Adjusted for score: TOR 40% · WSH 60%
Faceoffs · WSH won53%off44%neu29%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
TOR1 / 7 · 1.55 xG
WSH2 / 5 · 1.80 xG
Medium dangermid-range
TOR0 / 14 · 1.46 xG
WSH2 / 17 · 1.65 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
TOR1 / 30 · 0.39 xG
WSH0 / 43 · 0.81 xG

TOR went 0-for-14 from medium danger on 1.46 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
TOR
2 G · 3.40 xG · -1.4
WSH
4 G · 4.25 xG · -0.3
012345

TOR finished -1.4 against expected, WSH -0.3.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
TOR
SNAP2/18
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/6
WRIST0/3
BAT0/0
OTHER0/13
WSH
SNAP1/26
SLAP2/10
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND1/3
WRIST0/5
BAT0/1
OTHER0/14
TOR
WSH
Off the rush
1 G on 28
2.59 xG
2 G on 37
2.84 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3
0.53 xG
1 G on 4
0.46 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: TOR went 2-for-18, WSH 1-for-26. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Woll
TOR · 30/33 · .909
+1.3
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/51.8-0.2
Medium2/171.6-0.3
Low0/430.8+0.8

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

L. Thompson
WSH · 20/22 · .909
+1.4
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/71.6+0.6
Medium0/141.5+1.5
Low1/300.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

89 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
TOR
38 shots
2
Final
89 shots
WSH
51 shots
4
TOR attackWSH attack
TOR WSH Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — TOR left, WSH right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
T. Wilson
#43 · R · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:36 on ice · +2
C. McMichael
#24 · L · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 15:49 on ice · +2
J. Chychrun
#6 · D · WSH
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 24:08 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Fri, Nov 28
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 6:05 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Washington's underlying play justifies the favorite label. The model projects a 2.4-2.8 goal game with the Capitals at 56% win probability—a number explained by 5v5 control: Washington owns 50.0% xG% and 49.0% Corsi% while Toronto sits at 46.0% and 45.0%.

Form widens the gap. Washington is 6-3-1 over their last ten games; Toronto is -7 in goal differential over the same span. The Leafs aren't trending the right way.

The counterargument is Washington's PDO at 1.018—running hot enough to invite regression. Toronto's 1.002 sits closer to par, so if expected outcomes reassert themselves, the Capitals' edge compresses. The underlying numbers still favor Washington, but less decisively than win probability suggests.

Back-to-back fatigue clouds the goaltending picture. C. Lindgren and J. Woll each carry heavy workload into this matchup—watch for a backup start or visible tiredness.

Toronto's scoring hinges on concentrated punch; Washington's on distributed depth. Auston Matthews anchors the Leafs at 1.10 xG/60, with 17G 13A and 10.6% shooting. John Tavares (0.91 xG/60, 15G 24A, 12.4% shooting) provides secondary pressure, especially on the power play where he's posted three high-danger goals.

Alex Ovechkin leads Washington's charge at 19G 17A despite 0.97 xG/60—a gap that hints at both finish quality and variance. Anthony Beauvillier (0.89 xG/60, 14G 9A, 10.4% shooting) adds secondary thrust. Washington's advantage is multiple scoring threats, not a single gravitational center.

The Corsi% gap dictates the game: Washington will dominate possession, forcing Toronto to maximize efficiency on transitions. Toronto's 46.0% xG rate is respectable; conversion and goaltending determine if they can withstand territorial pressure.

The edge belongs to Washington. Expect a night of Capitals control, with their depth converting the model's advantage into the expected margin.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

WSH 56%
56%
WSH
Model favorite
44%
56%
TOR50WSH

WSH by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score TOR 2.4–2.8 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
TOR← edge
edge →WSH
46.0%50.0%
45.0%49.0%
2.242.62
2.672.62
2.092.18
2.521.79
1.0021.018

WSH holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.002 vs 1.018) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
TOR
3-5-2
-7 GD · 1d rest
WSH
6-3-1
+9 GD · 1d rest
1.002
TOR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Capitals own the underlying play — 50.0% 5v5 xG vs 46.0%.
  • The Capitals drive Corsi at 49.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • The Capitals own the underlying play — 50.0% 5v5 xG vs 46.0%.
  • The Capitals drive Corsi at 49.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • C. Lindgren is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • J. Woll is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Capitals are the hotter team by points pace (6-3-1 in their last 10).
  • The Maple Leafs are underwater at -7 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
TOR
Expected in goal
J. Woll
back-to-back.972 last start
Backup Joseph Woll · -6.6 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

WSH
Expected in goal
C. Lindgren
back-to-back.857 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
TOR
Auston Matthews17G 13A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.6% sh
John Tavares15G 24A
0.91 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.4% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Keep going

Where to next