Motion-blurred skater in a green sweater
Breakdown · DAL at NJD

Stars shut out the Devils, 3-0

The verdict · stolen

The Stars stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.31–3.05 and won anyway.

DAL 3 · NJD 0
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 6:45 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Dallas stole this one. New Jersey controlled 57% of expected goals and still lost 3-0—a variance so severe it amounts to competitive negligence.

The Devils held 52% of shot attempts and manufactured four high-danger chances to Dallas's two. But xG tells the grimmer story: they generated 3.05 expected goals and converted zero. Dallas generated 2.31 and buried three. In a game that should have favored New Jersey by the underlying metrics, the Stars executed ruthlessly.

Mikko Rantanen's wrist shot from the doorstep early in the third period shifted momentum. Dallas built on that high-danger chance; New Jersey couldn't answer.

J. Oettinger stopped everything he faced, finishing 30-for-30 and contributing +3.05 above expectation—the margin that separated Dallas's actual talent from its xG. J. Markstrom fielded a lighter workload at 25-for-28 but surrendered 0.69 goals more than expected, the byproduct of facing cleaner looks from a more efficient opponent.

Dallas did what teams dream about: dominated where it mattered, limited mistakes, let the goalie carry the load. New Jersey played well and lost anyway.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Dec 3
DAL
3
NJD
0

Stars shut out the Devils, 3-0

Chances 2.3 – 3.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Devils deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
DAL
2.31
NJD
3.05
43% of the chances57%

The board read DAL 3, NJD 0. The chances read DAL 2.3, NJD 3.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
DAL
+0.7
goals above expected
DAL2.31 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
NJD3.05 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Devils left 3.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 11:34DALM. Heiskanen1–0
  2. P2 17:36DALJ. Robertson2–0
  3. P3 07:05DALM. Rantanen3–0
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
DAL
35 shots
3
Final
79 shots
NJD
44 shots
0
DAL attackNJD attack
DAL NJD Goal
35
shots · 3 in
44
shots · 0 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
DALNJD
1 / 2
0.49 xG
High danger
0 / 4
0.91 xG
2 / 14
1.31 xG
Medium
0 / 16
1.63 xG
0 / 28
0.51 xG
Low
0 / 48
0.51 xG

The Devils went 0 for 4 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Oettinger
+3.0
DAL · 30/30
D
J. Markstrom
−0.7
NJD · 25/28
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Stars shut out the Devils, 3-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–8no goals
    2ndshots 13–13
    1. 11:34DALM. Heiskanen(R. Hintz, J. Benn)1–0
    2. 17:36DALJ. Robertson(E. Lindell, J. Benn)2–0
    3rdshots 9–9
    1. 07:05DALM. Rantanen(E. Lindell, M. Heiskanen)3–0

    score reads DAL–NJD

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    2.31
    DAL chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +0.7
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    1.068
    DAL puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    39.3%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    2.31Expected goals3.05
    NJD 57% of the chance quality
    28Shots on goal30
    2High-danger chances4
    44All attempts (Corsi)68
    Adjusted for score: DAL 37% · NJD 64%
    Faceoffs · NJD won79%off55%neu52%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    DAL1 / 2 · 0.49 xG
    NJD0 / 4 · 0.91 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    DAL2 / 14 · 1.31 xG
    NJD0 / 16 · 1.63 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    DAL0 / 28 · 0.51 xG
    NJD0 / 48 · 0.51 xG

    NJD went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.63 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    DAL
    3 G · 2.31 xG · +0.7
    NJD
    0 G · 3.05 xG · -3.0
    01234

    DAL finished +0.7 against expected, NJD -3.0.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    DAL
    WRIST2/18
    SNAP1/8
    SLAP0/1
    TIP IN0/5
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    BACKHAND0/1
    DEFLECTED0/1
    OTHER0/9
    NJD
    WRIST0/17
    SNAP0/14
    SLAP0/8
    TIP IN0/2
    WRAP AROUND0/2
    BACKHAND0/1
    DEFLECTED0/0
    OTHER0/24
    DAL
    NJD
    Off the rush
    1 G on 25
    1.54 xG
    0 G on 25
    2.19 xG
    Off rebounds
    1 G on 2
    0.49 xG
    0 G on 3
    0.25 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: DAL went 2-for-18, NJD 0-for-17.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    J. Oettinger
    DAL · 30/30 · 1.000
    +3.0
    saved above expected
    A+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/40.9+0.9
    Medium0/161.6+1.6
    Low0/480.5+0.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Markstrom
    NJD · 25/28 · .893
    -0.7
    saved above expected
    D
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/20.5-0.5
    Medium2/141.3-0.7
    Low0/280.5+0.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    79 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    DAL
    35 shots
    3
    Final
    79 shots
    NJD
    44 shots
    0
    DAL attackNJD attack
    DAL NJD Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — DAL left, NJD right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    E. Lindell
    #23 · D · DAL
    0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 25:31 on ice · +3
    M. Heiskanen
    #4 · D · DAL
    1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 24:34 on ice · +3
    J. Benn
    #14 · L · DAL
    0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 13:10 on ice · +2
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Wed, Dec 3
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 6:44 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.4–2.5 goal game with New Jersey at 51% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

    Dallas arrives as the hotter team, 8-1-1 in their last 10. New Jersey's advanced metrics suggest otherwise. The Devils drive territorial play at 51.0% Corsi while Dallas sits at 47.0%. Dallas counters with a marginal xG edge: 51.0% to 50.0%. Neither is decisive.

    The real story hides in variance. Dallas runs a 1.024 PDO—unsustainably hot goaltending and bounces combined. New Jersey sits at 0.971, flagging either a harder shot diet or simple bad luck. Both trends will regress; the timing is unknowable.

    Dallas enjoys a three-day rest advantage over New Jersey's single day off. J. Allen faces the back-to-back for Dallas and may start fatigued or yield to a backup.

    Jason Robertson anchors the Stars at 0.96 expected goals per 60 minutes with 25 goals, 21 assists, and a 12.4% shooting rate inflated by two high-danger finishes. Michael Bunting wheels at 0.83 xG/60 with eight goals, 14 assists, and 7.6% shooting—a volume player, not a clinical finisher. Timo Meier registers 1.08 xG/60 for New Jersey, the highest here, with 13 goals, 15 assists, three high-danger finishes, and a concerning 6.7% rate suggesting regression. Jack Hughes contributes 0.88 xG/60 with 18 goals and 17 assists at 11.5% shooting; one high-danger finish flags efficient but constrained volume.

    Both teams show zero high-danger goal rate and zero rebound goal rate—a red flag for finishers or goaltending systems that lock down after the first chance. Dallas's Tyler Myers is a weak defensive link. New Jersey's Johnathan Kovacevic carries the same liability.

    The Devils' possession edge and the Stars' recent pace create genuine tension. One regression, one hot goaltender, one moment—any shifts this from even to tilted. That's the coin.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    NJD 51%
    51%
    NJD
    Model favorite
    49%
    51%
    DAL50NJD

    NJD by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score DAL 2.4–2.5 NJD; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    DAL← edge
    edge →NJD
    51.0%50.0%
    47.0%51.0%
    2.362.45
    2.292.50
    2.071.66
    1.682.23
    1.0240.971

    DAL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.024 vs 0.971) says DAL has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    DAL
    8-1-1
    +24 GD · 3d rest
    NJD
    5-5-0
    -3 GD · 1d rest
    1.024
    DAL PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    0.971
    NJD PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Devils drive Corsi at 51.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    Regression watch
    • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    • The Stars' PDO is 1.024 — running hot, expect some regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Devils drive Corsi at 51.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    • J. Allen is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Stars are the hotter team by points pace (8-1-1 in their last 10).
    • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    • The Stars have 2 more days of rest.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    DAL
    Expected in goal
    C. DeSmith
    3 days rest.938 last start
    Backup Jake Oettinger · +5.7 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    NJD
    Expected in goal
    J. Allen
    back-to-back.800 last start
    Backup Jacob Markstrom · -11.9 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    DAL
    Jason Robertson25G 21A
    0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
    Michael Bunting8G 14A
    0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
    NJD
    Timo Meier13G 15A
    1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
    Jack Hughes18G 17A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next