Backcheck
Recap · WSH at LAK

Capitals hold off the Kings

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 6:47 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WSH
Washington Capitals
3
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.51Expected goals3.04
53% share for the better side
25Shot attempts (SOG)25
5High-danger chances3
44Corsi (all attempts)68
Score-adjusted: 37% / 63%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Washington's 3-1 victory over Los Angeles masks how tightly contested this game actually was. Expected goals split nearly even—3.04 to 3.51, a 46-54 advantage to the Capitals. Shot attempts finished 25-25. Yet the Kings left two goals on the table.

Los Angeles underperformed their expected goals by 2.04, a significant margin driven by wasted high-danger chances. The Kings generated 5 high-danger opportunities to Washington's 3, but scored just once. They created three rebound chances—crashing the net effectively—yet converted zero.

Washington's edge came from precision, not volume. The Capitals averaged 0.080 expected goals per shot versus Los Angeles's 0.045, indicating superior placement. They capitalized: 2 goals on 5 high-danger chances (40%). They also proved lethal in transition, scoring twice on 24 rush attempts.

The turning point came at 18:18 of the second period when Aliaksei Protas fired a wrist shot from the high slot—a shift in momentum despite the underlying flow remaining competitive.

Goaltending proved decisive. L. Thompson stopped 24 of 25 shots (0.960 save percentage), overperforming his expected goals against by 2.04. D. Kuemper made 22 of 24 saves (0.917 SV%), also outperforming expectations by 1.51. Thompson's margin of outperformance separated the teams.

A. Ovechkin recorded two assists in 16:46, orchestrating from limited ice time. T. Wilson scored once in 21:14, capitalizing on the system the Capitals established. For Los Angeles, A. Kopitar contributed one assist in 20:35, the Kings' most dangerous forward despite the team's overall underperformance.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH2 / 5 · 1.81 xG
LAK0 / 3 · 0.63 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH1 / 11 · 1.18 xG
LAK1 / 17 · 1.74 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 28 · 0.52 xG
LAK0 / 48 · 0.67 xG

LAK went 1-for-17 from medium danger on 1.74 expected goals — 0.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
3 G · 3.51 xG · -0.5
LAK
1 G · 3.04 xG · -2.0
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. ThompsonWSH
+2.0
D. KuemperLAK
+1.5

WSH finished -0.5 against expected, LAK -2.0 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST2/25
TIP IN1/4
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/3
SNAP0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/7
LAK
WRIST0/26
TIP IN1/8
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/1
SNAP0/4
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/22
WSH
LAK
Off the rush
2 G on 24 · 2.27 xG
1 G on 26 · 1.88 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.12 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.44 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 2-for-25, LAK 0-for-26. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Ovechkin
#8 · L · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 16:46 TOI
T. Wilson
#43 · R · WSH
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 21:14 TOI · +1
A. Kopitar
#11 · C · LAK
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 20:35 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • L. Thompson (WSH) stopped 2.0 goals above expected.
  • WSH had the higher quality looks — 0.080 xG/shot vs 0.045.
  • WSH was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • LAK created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK underperformed xG by 2.0 — wasted quality chances.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • D. Kuemper (LAK) saved 1.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WSH at LAK · 10:30 PM ET

Capitals at Kings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 6:43 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
LAK
Model favorite
46%
54%
WSH50LAK

LAK by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WSH 2.42.6 LAK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WSH← edge
edge →LAK
50.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
49.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.62xGF / 602.42
2.62xGA / 602.20
2.18Goals for / gm1.85
1.79Goals against / gm1.71
1.018PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 1.002) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4-to-2.6 goal game with the Kings at 54% win probability—a genuine coin flip, with perhaps the slimmest of edges to Los Angeles.

That margin reflects competitive parity at 5v5. Washington operates at 50.0% expected goals share and 49.0% Corsi percentage, generating chances below the average rate and spending considerable time defending. Los Angeles runs 52.0% xG% and 52.0% Corsi%, signaling territorial control and the ability to dictate terms. The Kings' possession edge represents their primary advantage: they'll dominate shot volume through most of this game.

The Capitals carry a 1.018 PDO against the Kings' 1.002, suggesting favorable bounces are working in their favor. That's running hot—expect some regression.

Production comes from elite individuals. Alex Ovechkin operates at 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes with 19 goals, 17 assists, 13.8% shooting, and 2 high-danger goals. Anthony Beauvillier runs 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals, 9 assists, 10.4% shooting, and 2 high-danger goals, providing secondary firepower. Los Angeles counters with Alex Laferriere at 0.87 xG/60, 16 goals, 18 assists, 9.9% shooting, and 2 high-danger goals—comparable production in a team with possession advantage. Jared Wright contributes 0 goals and 4 assists on 0.83 xG/60, functioning as a facilitator.

The tactical story is straightforward. The Kings should generate more consistent chances through superior possession. Washington has better finishers, particularly Ovechkin, but must overcome a possession deficit to convert. The Capitals' high PDO suggests their recent success has benefited from favorable variance; expect some regression.

Declan Chisholm and Adrian Kempe represent defensive weak links for their respective teams, but the possession advantage will determine the outcome far more than any single matchup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters