Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · WSH at LAK

Capitals hold off the Kings

The verdict · earned

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 3 · LAK 1
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 6:47 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Washington's 3-1 victory over Los Angeles masks how tightly contested this game actually was. Expected goals split nearly even—3.04 to 3.51, a 46-54 advantage to the Capitals. Shot attempts finished 25-25. Yet the Kings left two goals on the table.

Los Angeles underperformed their expected goals by 2.04, a significant margin driven by wasted high-danger chances. The Kings generated 5 high-danger opportunities to Washington's 3, but scored just once. They created three rebound chances—crashing the net effectively—yet converted zero.

Washington's edge came from precision, not volume. The Capitals averaged 0.080 expected goals per shot versus Los Angeles's 0.045, indicating superior placement. They capitalized: 2 goals on 5 high-danger chances (40%). They also proved lethal in transition, scoring twice on 24 rush attempts.

The turning point came at 18:18 of the second period when Aliaksei Protas fired a wrist shot from the high slot—a shift in momentum despite the underlying flow remaining competitive.

Goaltending proved decisive. L. Thompson stopped 24 of 25 shots (0.960 save percentage), overperforming his expected goals against by 2.04. D. Kuemper made 22 of 24 saves (0.917 SV%), also outperforming expectations by 1.51. Thompson's margin of outperformance separated the teams.

A. Ovechkin recorded two assists in 16:46, orchestrating from limited ice time. T. Wilson scored once in 21:14, capitalizing on the system the Capitals established. For Los Angeles, A. Kopitar contributed one assist in 20:35, the Kings' most dangerous forward despite the team's overall underperformance.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Dec 2
WSH
3
LAK
1

Capitals hold off the Kings

Chances 3.5 – 3.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
3.51
LAK
3.04
53% of the chances47%

The board read WSH 3, LAK 1. The chances read WSH 3.5, LAK 3.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
−0.5
goals above expected
WSH3.51 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
LAK3.04 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Kings left 2.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 14:50WSHT. WilsonPP1–0
  2. P2 05:28LAKA. Kempe1–1
  3. P3 01:18WSHA. Beauvillier2–1
  4. P3 18:18WSHA. ProtasEN3–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
37 shots
3
Final
83 shots
LAK
46 shots
1
WSH attackLAK attack
WSH LAK Goal
37
shots · 3 in
46
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHLAK
2 / 5
1.81 xG
High danger
0 / 3
0.63 xG
1 / 11
1.18 xG
Medium
1 / 17
1.74 xG
0 / 28
0.52 xG
Low
0 / 48
0.67 xG

The Kings went 0 for 3 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
L. Thompson
+2.0
WSH · 24/25
A
D. Kuemper
+1.5
LAK · 22/24
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals hold off the Kings

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 12–3
  1. 14:50WSHT. Wilsonpower play(R. Leonard, A. Ovechkin)1–0
2ndshots 8–14
  1. 05:28LAKA. Kempe(A. Kopitar, T. Moore)1–1
3rdshots 5–8
  1. 01:18WSHA. Beauvillier(C. McMichael, A. Ovechkin)2–1
  2. 18:18WSHA. Protasempty net(M. Fehérváry, J. Carlson)3–1

score reads WSH–LAK

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.51
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
−0.5
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.054
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
39.3%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.51Expected goals3.04
WSH 53% of the chance quality
25Shots on goal25
5High-danger chances3
44All attempts (Corsi)68
Adjusted for score: WSH 37% · LAK 63%
Faceoffs · LAK won47%off53%neu42%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH2 / 5 · 1.81 xG
LAK0 / 3 · 0.63 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH1 / 11 · 1.18 xG
LAK1 / 17 · 1.74 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 28 · 0.52 xG
LAK0 / 48 · 0.67 xG

LAK went 1-for-17 from medium danger on 1.74 expected goals — 0.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
3 G · 3.51 xG · -0.5
LAK
1 G · 3.04 xG · -2.0
01234

WSH finished -0.5 against expected, LAK -2.0.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST2/25
TIP IN1/4
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/3
SNAP0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/7
LAK
WRIST0/26
TIP IN1/8
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/1
SNAP0/4
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/22
WSH
LAK
Off the rush
2 G on 24
2.27 xG
1 G on 26
1.88 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2
0.12 xG
0 G on 3
0.44 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 2-for-25, LAK 0-for-26. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
L. Thompson
WSH · 24/25 · .960
+2.0
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/30.6+0.6
Medium1/171.7+0.7
Low0/480.7+0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

D. Kuemper
LAK · 22/24 · .917
+1.5
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/51.8-0.2
Medium1/111.2+0.2
Low0/280.5+0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

83 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
37 shots
3
Final
83 shots
LAK
46 shots
1
WSH attackLAK attack
WSH LAK Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, LAK right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Ovechkin
#8 · L · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 16:46 on ice
T. Wilson
#43 · R · WSH
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 21:14 on ice · +1
A. Kopitar
#11 · C · LAK
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 20:35 on ice · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Tue, Dec 2
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 6:43 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.4-to-2.6 goal game with the Kings at 54% win probability—a genuine coin flip, with perhaps the slimmest of edges to Los Angeles.

That margin reflects competitive parity at 5v5. Washington operates at 50.0% expected goals share and 49.0% Corsi percentage, generating chances below the average rate and spending considerable time defending. Los Angeles runs 52.0% xG% and 52.0% Corsi%, signaling territorial control and the ability to dictate terms. The Kings' possession edge represents their primary advantage: they'll dominate shot volume through most of this game.

The Capitals carry a 1.018 PDO against the Kings' 1.002, suggesting favorable bounces are working in their favor. That's running hot—expect some regression.

Production comes from elite individuals. Alex Ovechkin operates at 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes with 19 goals, 17 assists, 13.8% shooting, and 2 high-danger goals. Anthony Beauvillier runs 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals, 9 assists, 10.4% shooting, and 2 high-danger goals, providing secondary firepower. Los Angeles counters with Alex Laferriere at 0.87 xG/60, 16 goals, 18 assists, 9.9% shooting, and 2 high-danger goals—comparable production in a team with possession advantage. Jared Wright contributes 0 goals and 4 assists on 0.83 xG/60, functioning as a facilitator.

The tactical story is straightforward. The Kings should generate more consistent chances through superior possession. Washington has better finishers, particularly Ovechkin, but must overcome a possession deficit to convert. The Capitals' high PDO suggests their recent success has benefited from favorable variance; expect some regression.

Declan Chisholm and Adrian Kempe represent defensive weak links for their respective teams, but the possession advantage will determine the outcome far more than any single matchup.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

LAK 54%
54%
LAK
Model favorite
46%
54%
WSH50LAK

LAK by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WSH 2.4–2.6 LAK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →LAK
50.0%52.0%
49.0%52.0%
2.622.42
2.622.20
2.181.85
1.791.71
1.0181.002

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 1.002) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
WSH
7-2-1
+12 GD · 2d rest
LAK
6-1-3
+5 GD · 2d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.002
LAK PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Kings drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • The Kings drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
WSH
Expected in goal
L. Thompson
2 days rest.968 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

LAK
Expected in goal
A. Forsberg
2 days rest.950 last start
Backup Darcy Kuemper · -5.8 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Keep going

Where to next