Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · WSH at SJS

Capitals pull away from the Sharks

The verdict · coin flip

The Capitals won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

WSH 7 · SJS 1
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 6:52 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Expected goals favored San Jose slightly. Washington's 7-1 rout shattered that narrative.

The Sharks held a 3.09–2.98 xG edge, a 51–49% split that suggested an even contest. Yet the Capitals converted at an elite rate while the Sharks found little finish—Washington overperformed its expected output by 4.02 goals, San Jose underperformed by 2.09.

C. Lindgren (WSH) made the difference between a competitive game and a rout: a 0.958 save percentage that denied 2.09 goals above expected. Y. Askarov (SJS) allowed 2.85 goals above his expected workload across 12 shots, a performance that explained much of the margin. A. Nedeljkovic replaced him in net and stopped 16 of 19 (0.842 SV%), but the deficit had ballooned too far.

Washington's rush game proved the separation. The Capitals scored 4 goals on 24 rush attempts—a conversion rate that outpaced every other factor. M. Roy orchestrated with 3 assists in 21:57. R. Leonard matched the output with 2 goals and 2 assists in 13:39, while T. van Riemsdyk added 2 assists in 17:38.

San Jose's underlying performance remained sound. The Sharks held 44% of shot attempts (24-31 on goal), generated 3 rebound chances, and finished 4-3 in high-danger opportunities. They converted none. Pavol Regenda's tip-in from the doorstep (third period, 12:58) epitomized the gap: when opportunity met execution, Washington succeeded; San Jose faltered.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Dec 3
WSH
7
SJS
1

Capitals pull away from the Sharks

Chances 3.0 – 3.1Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Capitals took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
2.98
SJS
3.09
49% of the chances51%

The board read WSH 7, SJS 1. The chances read WSH 3.0, SJS 3.1.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
+4.0
goals above expected
WSH2.98 expected · 7 scored
Expected
Scored
SJS3.09 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals scored 4.0 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 08:25WSHA. Ovechkin1–0
  2. P1 10:05WSHS. Milano2–0
  3. P1 13:35WSHR. Leonard3–0
  4. P1 17:07WSHB. DuhaimeSH4–0
  5. P2 02:41WSHA. OvechkinPP5–0
  6. P2 19:34WSHD. Strome6–0
  7. P3 01:03WSHR. Leonard7–0
+1 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
41 shots
7
Final
80 shots
SJS
39 shots
1
WSH attackSJS attack
WSH SJS Goal
41
shots · 7 in
39
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHSJS
2 / 3
0.66 xG
High danger
1 / 4
1.00 xG
4 / 15
1.75 xG
Medium
0 / 13
1.51 xG
1 / 29
0.57 xG
Low
0 / 40
0.57 xG

The Capitals buried 2 of 3 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
C. Lindgren
+2.1
WSH · 23/24
C
A. Nedeljkovic
−0.0
SJS · 16/19
+1 more on the full breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals pull away from the Sharks

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 12–11
  1. 08:25WSHA. Ovechkin(M. Roy)1–0
  2. 10:05WSHS. Milano(D. Chisholm, T. van Riemsdyk)2–0
  3. 13:35WSHR. Leonard(T. van Riemsdyk, B. Duhaime)3–0
  4. 17:07WSHB. Duhaimeshorthanded(A. Protas)4–0
2ndshots 14–7
  1. 02:41WSHA. Ovechkinpower play(R. Leonard, J. Chychrun)5–0
  2. 19:34WSHD. Strome(M. Roy, R. Leonard)6–0
3rdshots 5–6
  1. 01:03WSHR. Leonard(M. Roy, C. Lindgren)7–0
  2. 12:58SJSP. Regendapower play(D. Orlov, A. Gaudette)7–1

score reads WSH–SJS

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
2.98
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
+4.0
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.131
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
45.2%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.98Expected goals3.09
SJS 51% of the chance quality
31Shots on goal24
3High-danger chances4
47All attempts (Corsi)57
Adjusted for score: WSH 40% · SJS 61%
Faceoffs · SJS won39%off63%neu27%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH2 / 3 · 0.66 xG
SJS1 / 4 · 1.00 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH4 / 15 · 1.75 xG
SJS0 / 13 · 1.51 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH1 / 29 · 0.57 xG
SJS0 / 40 · 0.57 xG

WSH went 4-for-15 from medium danger on 1.75 expected goals — 2.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
7 G · 2.98 xG · +4.0
SJS
1 G · 3.09 xG · -2.1
012345678

WSH finished +4.0 against expected, SJS -2.1.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST3/22
SLAP1/4
TIP IN1/3
SNAP0/6
BACKHAND2/4
DEFLECTED0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/6
SJS
WRIST0/20
SLAP0/9
TIP IN1/6
SNAP0/1
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/18
WSH
SJS
Off the rush
4 G on 24
2.01 xG
1 G on 26
2.27 xG
Off rebounds
2 G on 4
0.57 xG
0 G on 3
0.46 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 3-for-22, SJS 0-for-20. WSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
C. Lindgren
WSH · 23/24 · .958
+2.1
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.0+0.0
Medium0/131.5+1.5
Low0/400.6+0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

Y. Askarov
SJS · 8/12 · .667
-1.0
saved above expected
D-
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/30.7-1.3
Medium4/151.8-2.3
Low1/290.6-0.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

A. Nedeljkovic
SJS · 16/19 · .842
-0.0
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/30.7-1.3
Medium4/151.8-2.3
Low1/290.6-0.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

80 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
41 shots
7
Final
80 shots
SJS
39 shots
1
WSH attackSJS attack
WSH SJS Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, SJS right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. Leonard
#9 · R · WSH
2 G · 2 A · 6 SOG · 13:39 on ice · +3
M. Roy
#3 · D · WSH
0 G · 3 A · 2 SOG · 21:57 on ice · +3
T. van Riemsdyk
#57 · D · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 17:38 on ice · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Wed, Dec 3
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 6:48 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The projection model doesn't equivocate: Washington at 2.6 expected goals, San Jose at 2.6, with the Sharks holding 50% win probability. There is no lean here.

Washington's recent form suggests otherwise. The Capitals are 7-2-1 in their last 10, capturing points at a pace that would rank near the league's top third. San Jose, meanwhile, sits at -5 goal differential over the same stretch—a team that is being outshot and outscored in ways that tend to persist.

The underlying numbers tighten the gap. Washington owns a 50.0% expected goals share at 5v5 and 49.0% Corsi, suggesting genuine possession control; San Jose trails at 48.0% xG% and 47.0% Corsi. That's a meaningful edge, but not overwhelming. What complicates Washington's picture is PDO—they're at 1.018, a number that historically regresses. The Capitals are converting at rates that rarely sustain.

San Jose gets a rest advantage: one day since their last game, Washington three. Y. Askarov on a back-to-back complicates matters—watch for a backup start or a starter without his legs.

The game hinges on two names. Alex Ovechkin drives Washington's offense—0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes, 19 goals, 17 assists, two high-danger goals at 13.8% shooting. Pavol Regenda paces San Jose's expected goal generation at 1.10 per 60 with 5 goals, 1 assist, and two high-danger goals—a setup suggesting either a compressed role or a cold streak about to break. Anthony Beauvillier supports Ovechkin at 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals, 9 assists, and two high-danger goals, his 10.4% shooting rate suggesting runway remaining.

Igor Chernyshov complicates San Jose's defense despite contributing 6 goals and 8 assists at 15.0% shooting. Declan Chisholm is Washington's defensive liability.

This is a game decided by goaltending or a power-play conversion. The models call it 50-50, with a marginal edge to Washington. Take that lean or the value of San Jose's rest day. Either way, you're splitting hairs.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

SJS 50%
50%
SJS
Model favorite
50%
50%
WSH50SJS

SJS by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.6–2.6 SJS; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →SJS
50.0%48.0%
49.0%47.0%
2.622.33
2.622.56
2.181.99
1.792.32
1.0180.998

WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 0.998) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
WSH
7-2-1
+12 GD · 3d rest
SJS
5-5-0
-5 GD · 1d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.998
SJS PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • Y. Askarov is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Capitals are the hotter team by points pace (7-2-1 in their last 10).
  • The Sharks are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
  • The Capitals have 2 more days of rest.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
WSH
Expected in goal
L. Thompson
3 days rest.968 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

SJS
Expected in goal
Y. Askarov
back-to-back.912 last start
Backup Yaroslav Askarov · -18.9 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Keep going

Where to next