Backcheck
Recap · CHI at LAK

Blackhawks hold off the Kings

The Blackhawks won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:27 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
2
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.47Expected goals3.35
51% share for the better side
36Shot attempts (SOG)27
6High-danger chances7
68Corsi (all attempts)74
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

S. Knight stole this game. The expected goals nearly split even at 3.35 for Chicago and 3.47 for Los Angeles, yet the Blackhawks won 2-1—a margin that owed entirely to goaltending. Knight saved 2.35 goals above expected, while D. Kuemper stopped 1.47 more than he should have, a difference that proved decisive.

The Kings underperformed their xG by 2.35 goals, wasting quality opportunities. Los Angeles held 43% of shot attempts and created eight rebound opportunities without converting any, a pattern of inefficiency that strangled their chances. Chicago, meanwhile, was lethal off the rush: two goals on 28 such chances, a conversion rate that defied the overall play's parity.

Trevor Moore's wrist shot from a sharp angle (10:38, P3) was the game's turning point, but Knight's exceptional net-minding was what truly decided it.

Three Stars

  • #91 F. Nazar (CHI) — 2A in 18:48
  • #44 W. Kaiser (CHI) — 1G in 20:21
  • #98 C. Bedard (CHI) — 1G in 17:59
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CHI2 / 6 · 1.34 xG
LAK1 / 7 · 1.38 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CHI0 / 10 · 1.24 xG
LAK0 / 11 · 1.31 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CHI0 / 52 · 0.90 xG
LAK0 / 56 · 0.67 xG

LAK went 0-for-11 from medium danger on 1.31 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CHI
2 G · 3.47 xG · -1.5
LAK
1 G · 3.35 xG · -2.4
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. KnightCHI
+2.4
D. KuemperLAK
+1.5

CHI finished -1.5 against expected, LAK -2.4 — S. Knight (CHI) saved 2.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CHI
WRIST2/39
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/2
SNAP0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
POKE0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/20
LAK
WRIST1/34
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/2
SNAP0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
POKE0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/27
CHI
LAK
Off the rush
2 G on 28 · 2.25 xG
1 G on 25 · 1.60 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.31 xG
0 G on 8 · 1.32 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CHI went 2-for-39, LAK 1-for-34. CHI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
F. Nazar
#91 · C · CHI
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 18:48 TOI · +1
W. Kaiser
#44 · D · CHI
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 20:21 TOI · +1
C. Bedard
#98 · C · CHI
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 17:59 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Knight (CHI) stopped 2.4 goals above expected.
  • CHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • LAK created 8 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK underperformed xG by 2.4 — wasted quality chances.
  • S. Knight (CHI) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CHI at LAK · 10:00 PM ET

The Kings are the model's lean over the Blackhawks on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 11, 7:01 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

61%
LAK
Model favorite
39%
61%
CHI50LAK

LAK by 22 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score CHI 2.22.8 LAK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CHI← edge
edge →LAK
42.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
46.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.17xGF / 602.42
2.94xGA / 602.20
1.84Goals for / gm1.85
2.41Goals against / gm1.71
0.996PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.996 vs 1.002) says LAK has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.2–2.8 goal range with the Kings at 61% win probability. That lean reflects Los Angeles's dominance in 5v5 play: 52.0% expected goals and 52.0% Corsi, versus Chicago's 42.0% xG and 46.0% Corsi. When one team drives both volume and quality, territorial control becomes destiny.

Recent form amplifies the edge. The Kings sit 5-2-3 over their last 10 games, while the Blackhawks lumber underwater at -6 in goal differential over the same stretch. Chicago's underlying metrics suggest the shortfall isn't noise—they're being out-attempted and out-shot in ways that predictive models catch long before the scoreboard does.

The Kings' structural superiority shows up in every meaningful spot. Tyler Bertuzzi leads Chicago's offense at 0.85 xG/60 with 20 goals and 15 assists, leaning on an 18.0% shooting rate that will regress. Connor Bedard runs 0.82 xG/60 at 11.8% over 17 goals and 27 assists. Chicago's duo can't overcome Los Angeles's underlying advantage.

Alex Laferriere (0.87 xG/60, 16 goals, 18 assists) anchors the Kings' punch. Jared Wright operates at 0.83 xG/60 with 4 assists. If the model's edge holds, the Kings don't need secondary scoring; process typically finds outcome over time.

Limiting Bertuzzi's 7 high-danger goals becomes Los Angeles's defensive priority. Chicago must contain Laferriere's 0.87 xG/60 efficiency and 2 high-danger markers. Anton Frondell anchors Chicago's defense while Adrian Kempe does the same for Los Angeles—whichever falters first could decide a close game.

The model's 61% lean reflects the underlying reality: Chicago can compete, but Los Angeles controls the play. That advantage deserves respect.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters