Backcheck
Recap · COL at NYR

Avalanche run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Avalanche earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:10 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
COL
Colorado Avalanche
3
Home
NYR
New York Rangers
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.45Expected goals2.37
65% share for the better side
42Shot attempts (SOG)27
7High-danger chances1
73Corsi (all attempts)61
Score-adjusted: 53% / 47%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado had one high-danger chance. New York had seven. Colorado won 3-2 in overtime—a contradiction resolved by two facts: I. Shesterkin's elite goaltending and the Avalanche's decisive edge in shot quality.

The Avalanche controlled 65% of 5v5 expected goals (4.45–2.37). Their shot quality was the differentiator: 0.061 xG per attempt vs 0.039 for New York, a gap that reflects dominance even when shot volume barely favored Colorado (42–27 on goal). On rush chances, Colorado converted twice on 30 attempts. On high-danger looks, they couldn't convert their one chance—while Shesterkin went 100% SV against New York's seven HD attempts.

The goaltending numbers tell the story. I. Shesterkin (NYR) stopped 39 of 42 for a 0.929 SV%, but the real number is +1.45 against expected—elite performance that kept the Rangers alive. The Avalanche underperformed their own xG by the same margin, suggesting variance that, without Shesterkin's brilliance, would have been even wider. M. Blackwood (COL) was steady at 0.926 SV% on 27 shots.

Nathan MacKinnon's backhander from the high slot at 02:46 of overtime decided it—a goal that capped the Avalanche's underlying dominance.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
COL0 / 7 · 1.86 xG
NYR0 / 1 · 0.24 xG
Medium dangermid-range
COL3 / 16 · 1.75 xG
NYR1 / 9 · 1.17 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
COL0 / 50 · 0.84 xG
NYR1 / 51 · 0.95 xG

COL went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.86 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
COL
3 G · 4.45 xG · -1.4
NYR
2 G · 2.37 xG · -0.4
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
M. BlackwoodCOL
+0.4
I. ShesterkinNYR
+1.4

COL finished -1.4 against expected, NYR -0.4 — I. Shesterkin (NYR) saved 1.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
COL
WRIST0/31
SNAP0/4
BACKHAND1/5
SLAP0/4
TIP IN1/3
WRAP AROUND0/2
POKE0/1
BAT1/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/21
NYR
WRIST0/24
SNAP1/7
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP1/5
TIP IN0/4
WRAP AROUND0/0
POKE0/0
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/17
COL
NYR
Off the rush
2 G on 30 · 2.37 xG
1 G on 19 · 1.32 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5 · 0.72 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.54 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: COL went 0-for-31, NYR 0-for-24. COL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Necas
#88 · C · COL
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 22:12 TOI · +2
N. MacKinnon
#29 · C · COL
2 G · 0 A · 7 SOG · 24:56 TOI · +3
C. Makar
#8 · D · COL
0 G · 1 A · 7 SOG · 27:40 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • I. Shesterkin (NYR) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
  • COL had the higher quality looks — 0.061 xG/shot vs 0.039.
  • COL couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 30 rush chances.
  • NYR created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • COL created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • I. Shesterkin was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · COL at NYR · 12:30 PM ET

The Avalanche are the model's lean over the Rangers — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 7:07 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

56%
COL
Model favorite
56%
44%
COL50NYR

COL by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score COL 2.72.4 NYR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

COL← edge
edge →NYR
57.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
57.0%Corsi%49.0%
3.03xGF / 602.26
2.30xGA / 602.40
2.63Goals for / gm1.88
1.56Goals against / gm1.90
1.021PDO — luck, not skill1.009

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.021 vs 1.009) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a Colorado 2.7–2.4 New York game with the Avalanche at 56% win probability. This lean reflects Colorado's dominance across underlying metrics.

Colorado is 8-1-1 in their last 10, establishing momentum. At 5v5, the Avalanche control 57.0% expected goals and 57.0% shot attempts — territorial dominance that means sustained pressure. New York sits at 48.0% xG and 49.0% Corsi, which means defending almost the entire night.

The catch is PDO. Colorado runs 1.021, indicating luck has lifted their results beyond underlying play. New York's 1.009 sits closer to neutral. If Colorado's high-danger conversion and goaltending regress, the Rangers close the gap substantially.

Both goaltenders arrive on back-to-backs. I. Shesterkin for New York and M. Blackwood for Colorado face the fatigue cost that flattens performance. Don't bank on either stealing this one.

The matchup turns on four players. Artturi Lehkonen leads Colorado at 1.11 xG/60, yielding 18 goals, 22 assists, and 6 high-danger goals on a 14.9% shooting rate. He is New York's defensive focus. Ross Colton (1.10 xG/60, 7 goals, 15 assists, 1 HD goal) complements him, though a 4.9% shooting rate limits his secondary edge.

Adam Sykora (0.91 xG/60, 3 goals, 1 assist) carries minimal volume for New York, but a 20.0% shooting rate hints at finishing upside. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8 goals, 11 assists) offers secondary production, though 13.1% conversion and 2 high-danger goals suggest he runs on variance.

Defensive exposure exists on both sides. Nazem Kadri for Colorado and Vincent Iorio for New York are weak links that compound over 60 minutes.

Colorado's underlying edge looks durable even accounting for PDO regression. The Rangers face outmatched possession and shot creation — the metrics that predict outcomes. Colorado's 56% win probability holds unless New York steals one on goaltending luck.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters