Motion-blurred skater in a Anaheim Ducks sweater
Breakdown · WSH at ANA

Ducks run the Capitals off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Ducks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 3 · ANA 4
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 7:11 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Anaheim dominated the underlying play—61% expected goals and 64% shot attempts—and squeaked out a 4–3 shootout win. This scoreline undersells their control.

The Ducks converted their high-danger chances efficiently while the Capitals clawed back on elite goaltending. Mason McTavish's snap shot from the slot won it in the shootout.

Where the numbers diverged. Anaheim underperformed their expected goals by 1.5—wasted quality chances in the offensive zone. Washington compensated with exceptional performance: L. Thompson stopped 35 of 38 shots (0.921 save percentage, +1.51 goals above expected) and stole the show. V. Husso for Anaheim made 18 of 21 saves (0.857 save percentage).

Anaheim was lethal on the rush, scoring twice from 43 rush attempts. The Capitals were clinical in the high-danger zone, converting 2 of 4 chances (50%). Both teams created four rebound opportunities—Washington converted two, Anaheim none.

The shot attempts painted a starker picture: 38–21 in Anaheim's favor. Yet Thompson's performance kept the Capitals alive until the decisive moment.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · SO · Dec 5
WSH
3
ANA
4

Ducks run the Capitals off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 2.8 – 4.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Ducks earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
2.84
ANA
4.51
39% of the chances61%

The board read WSH 3, ANA 4. The chances read WSH 2.8, ANA 4.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
ANA
−0.5
goals above expected
ANA4.51 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
WSH2.84 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 09:29WSHT. Wilson1–0
  2. P1 18:16ANAC. Gauthier1–1
  3. P2 06:06WSHE. Frank2–1
  4. P2 06:19ANAR. Johnston2–2
  5. P2 07:38WSHA. Protas3–2
  6. P2 17:59ANAB. Sennecke3–3
  7. SO 00:00ANAT. TerryPP3–3
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
43 shots
4
Final
100 shots
ANA
57 shots
5
WSH attackANA attack
WSH ANA Goal

Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

43
shots · 4 in
57
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHANA
2 / 4
0.96 xG
High danger
1 / 4
1.09 xG
1 / 11
1.16 xG
Medium
2 / 26
2.86 xG
0 / 45
0.72 xG
Low
0 / 45
0.56 xG

High-danger looks: WSH 2 of 4, ANA 1 of 4.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
L. Thompson
+1.5
WSH · 35/38
C
V. Husso
−0.2
ANA · 18/21
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Ducks run the Capitals off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 8–12
  1. 09:29WSHT. Wilson(J. Sourdif, T. van Riemsdyk)1–0
  2. 18:16ANAC. Gauthier(B. Sennecke, J. LaCombe)1–1
2ndshots 9–15
  1. 06:06WSHE. Frank2–1
  2. 06:19ANAR. Johnston(R. Gudas, O. Zellweger)2–2
  3. 07:38WSHA. Protas(M. Roy, D. Strome)3–2
  4. 17:59ANAB. Sennecke(R. Johnston)3–3
3rdshots 3–8no goals
    OTshots 1–3no goals
      SO
      1. 00:00ANAT. Terrypower play3–3
      2. 00:00WSHA. Beauvillierpower play3–3
      3. 00:00ANAM. McTavishpower play3–3

      score reads WSH–ANA

      Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
      Process vs result

      The numbers

      XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
      4.51
      ANA chances
      Goals their shots were worth
      −0.5
      Finishing
      Goals below what those chances were worth
      0.990
      ANA puck luck
      About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
      55.6%
      Shot attempts
      Over half — they had the puck more
      Split by club

      Who controlled the game

      2.84Expected goals4.51
      ANA 61% of the chance quality
      21Shots on goal38
      4High-danger chances4
      60All attempts (Corsi)75
      Adjusted for score: WSH 43% · ANA 57%
      Faceoffs · ANA won69%off53%neu42%def
      Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
      How the game was won

      The danger ladder

      shotsgoalsexpected
      High dangerslot & crease
      WSH2 / 4 · 0.96 xG
      ANA1 / 4 · 1.09 xG
      Medium dangermid-range
      WSH1 / 11 · 1.16 xG
      ANA2 / 26 · 2.86 xG
      Low dangerperimeter & point
      WSH0 / 45 · 0.72 xG
      ANA0 / 45 · 0.56 xG

      WSH went 2-for-4 from high danger on 0.96 expected goals — 1.0 above expected.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
      The luck layer

      Finishing vs expected

      expectedactual
      WSH
      3 G · 2.84 xG · +0.2
      ANA
      4 G · 4.51 xG · -0.5
      012345

      WSH finished +0.2 against expected, ANA -0.5.

      Source · Backcheck xG model
      Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
      What they shot — and what went in

      Shot diet

      goalsshots
      WSH
      SNAP1/15
      WRIST2/13
      TIP IN0/8
      SLAP0/3
      BACKHAND0/1
      OTHER0/20
      ANA
      SNAP0/21
      WRIST2/14
      TIP IN1/5
      SLAP0/8
      BACKHAND0/6
      OTHER0/21
      WSH
      ANA
      Off the rush
      1 G on 25
      1.73 xG
      2 G on 43
      3.71 xG
      Off rebounds
      2 G on 4
      0.89 xG
      0 G on 4
      0.46 xG

      Snap shots carried the volume: WSH went 1-for-15, ANA 0-for-21. ANA scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
      New to these numbers?

      Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

      The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

      xG
      Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
      HD
      High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
      Corsi
      Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
      Adj.
      Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
      GSAx
      Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
      PDO
      Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
      Shot by shot

      In the net

      Graded on goals saved above expected
      L. Thompson
      WSH · 35/38 · .921
      +1.5
      saved above expected
      A
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger1/41.1+0.1
      Medium2/262.9+0.9
      Low0/450.6+0.6

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      V. Husso
      ANA · 18/21 · .857
      -0.2
      saved above expected
      C
      the night
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger2/41.0-1.0
      Medium1/111.2+0.2
      Low0/450.7+0.7

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      100 shots · press play to watch the game back

      Where the shots came from

      NHL play-by-play coordinates
      WSH
      43 shots
      4
      Final
      100 shots
      ANA
      57 shots
      5
      WSH attackANA attack
      WSH ANA Goal

      Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

      Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, ANA right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

      Ranked from the box score

      Three stars

      Points first
      Three stars · computed, not voted
      B. Sennecke
      #45 · R · ANA
      1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 17:15 on ice · +2
      R. Johnston
      #44 · L · ANA
      1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 07:42 on ice · +1
      J. LaCombe
      #2 · D · ANA
      0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 27:11 on ice
      Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
      What the model said beforehand

      Before the game

      Written Fri, Dec 5
      Open the pre-game read
      Written from the numbers

      The read

      Edited for clarity
      ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 7:08 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

      The model projects a 2.6-2.9 goal spread with the Ducks favored at 54% win probability. This is a pick'em disguised as a matchup—either team leaves with two points, and the probability gap barely matters.

      Washington arrives hot. The Capitals have gone 9-1-0 in their last 10 games, pacing at a point-per-game clip while Anaheim drowns at minus-6 goal differential over the same span. On paper, momentum is all Capitals.

      But the underlying numbers tell a more complicated story. Washington's 5v5 performance sits at 50.0% expected goals and 49.0% Corsi—essentially neutral territory. The Ducks, by contrast, push 52.0% in both metrics. Anaheim drives play. Expect territorial tilt favoring the home side.

      The real edge lives in regression. Anaheim's PDO of 0.981 means the Ducks are running cold relative to their shot quality; positive variance should follow. Washington's 1.018 PDO tells the inverse story—the Capitals have gotten lucky, and regression will eventually arrive. Neither edge is large enough to crown a favorite, but both point toward reversion.

      V. Husso and C. Lindgren are both working back-to-backs. Backup appearances or a tired starter from either crease are realistic.

      On talent, both rosters feature players generating their own chances. Alex Ovechkin (19G, 0.97 xG/60, 2 HD goals) remains Washington's offensive engine at 13.8% shooting. Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 0.89 xG/60, 2 HD goals) operates at 10.4% shooting. For Anaheim, Beckett Sennecke (20G, 1.03 xG/60, 8 HD goals) is the dangerous commodity at 13.5% shooting. Cutter Gauthier (25G, 0.99 xG/60, 2 HD goals) has the volume at 12.9% shooting, though this pace is fragile.

      The matchup hinges on whether Ovechkin or Sennecke generates space first. Ovechkin's experience and 0.97 xG/60 make him the predictable threat; Sennecke's eight high-danger goals suggest he's more lethal per chance.

      Washington's recent form and Ovechkin's consistency should appeal to pick sheets. Anaheim's underlying control—52.0% Corsi, positive regression brewing—appeals to process-focused forecasters. The Ducks' 54% implies they deserve this, but the model's narrow margin reflects genuine uncertainty.

      This is a coin flip. Treat it that way.

      What the model said beforehand

      The model's lean

      ANA 54%
      54%
      ANA
      Model favorite
      46%
      54%
      WSH50ANA

      ANA by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WSH 2.6–2.9 ANA; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

      Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
      Season rates · 5v5

      Tale of the tape

      NHL stats API · our xG
      WSH← edge
      edge →ANA
      50.0%52.0%
      49.0%52.0%
      2.622.80
      2.622.59
      2.182.09
      1.792.32
      1.0180.981

      ANA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 0.981) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

      Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
      Form · Last 10
      WSH
      9-1-0
      +24 GD · 1d rest
      ANA
      5-5-0
      -6 GD · 1d rest
      1.018
      WSH PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      0.981
      ANA PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      What decides it

      Keys to the game

      Where the edges live
      • The Ducks drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
      Regression watch
      • The Ducks' PDO is 0.981 — running cold, due for positive regression.
      • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
      Things to watch
      • The Ducks drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
      • V. Husso is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
      • C. Lindgren is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
      • The Capitals are the hotter team by points pace (9-1-0 in their last 10).
      • The Ducks are underwater at -6 goal differential over their last 10.
      • The Ducks' PDO is 0.981 — running cold, due for positive regression.
      Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

      Lineups

      NHL box score
      WSH
      Expected in goal
      C. Lindgren
      back-to-back.958 last start
      Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season
      Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      ANA
      Expected in goal
      V. Husso
      back-to-back.810 last start
      Backup Lukas Dostal · -2.9 GSAx this season
      Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

      No completed game on file for this club yet.

      Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

      Computed danger · scouting

      Players to watch

      NHL stats API · our xG
      WSH
      Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
      0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
      Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
      0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
      ANA
      Beckett Sennecke20G 19A
      1.03 xG/60 · 8 HD · 13.5% sh
      Cutter Gauthier25G 16A
      0.99 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.9% sh
      Keep going

      Where to next