Backcheck
Recap · PIT at DAL

Stars edge the Penguins in a shootout

The Stars won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:31 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PIT
Pittsburgh Penguins
2
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.65Expected goals3.90
52% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)23
4High-danger chances8
69Corsi (all attempts)55
Score-adjusted: 54% / 46%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Dallas overwhelmed Pittsburgh in underlying metrics—high-danger chances 8-4, expected goals 3.90-3.65—yet needed a shootout to separate from a Penguins team that rode T. Jarry's stellar play and scored on the rush.

The Stars controlled quality despite being outshot 29-23. Dallas generated 0.071 expected goals per shot versus Pittsburgh's 0.053—a gap that should have buried the Penguins. Both teams badly underperformed their models: Dallas by 0.90 goals, Pittsburgh by 1.65. But T. Jarry saved 1.9 goals above expected, and Pittsburgh scored on the rush (2 goals from 27 attempts), staying dangerous despite inferior chances.

Dallas wasted all 8 high-danger attempts, then only broke through when Mikko Rantanen's shootout snap shot from the high slot finally solved the Penguins.

Goaltending. T. Jarry (PIT) made 21 of 23 saves at 0.913 SV%, 1.9 goals above expected—the main reason Pittsburgh nearly escaped. J. Oettinger (DAL) posted 27 of 29 at 0.931 SV%, 1.65 above expected, and was excellent in his own right.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PIT0 / 4 · 1.06 xG
DAL0 / 8 · 1.89 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PIT2 / 18 · 1.91 xG
DAL1 / 14 · 1.58 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PIT0 / 47 · 0.67 xG
DAL1 / 33 · 0.44 xG

DAL went 0-for-8 from high danger on 1.89 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PIT
2 G · 3.65 xG · -1.6
DAL
3 G · 3.90 xG · -0.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
T. JarryPIT
+1.9
J. OettingerDAL
+1.6

PIT finished -1.6 against expected, DAL -0.9 — T. Jarry (PIT) saved 1.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PIT
SNAP0/22
SLAP1/10
TIP IN1/9
BACKHAND0/3
WRIST0/4
OTHER0/21
DAL
SNAP1/22
SLAP1/5
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/3
WRIST0/1
OTHER0/20
PIT
DAL
Off the rush
2 G on 27 · 2.33 xG
1 G on 27 · 2.92 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.62 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.25 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: PIT went 0-for-22, DAL 1-for-22. PIT scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Heiskanen
#4 · D · DAL
1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 27:57 TOI
W. Johnston
#53 · C · DAL
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 22:39 TOI
K. Letang
#58 · D · PIT
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 22:36 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • T. Jarry (PIT) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • DAL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.071 xG/shot vs 0.053. Quality over quantity.
  • DAL couldn't convert — 0/8 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • PIT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • PIT created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DAL underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • PIT underperformed xG by 1.6 — wasted quality chances.
  • T. Jarry (PIT) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • T. Jarry was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 8 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PIT at DAL · 6:00 PM ET

Penguins at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 7:29 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
DAL
Model favorite
48%
52%
PIT50DAL

DAL by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PIT 2.52.6 DAL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PIT← edge
edge →DAL
51.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
50.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.66xGF / 602.36
2.55xGA / 602.29
2.45Goals for / gm2.07
2.12Goals against / gm1.68
1.012PDO — luck, not skill1.024

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.012 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Dallas owns a 52% win probability, according to the model, in what projects as a 2.5–2.6 game. In other words: flip a coin.

The Stars earned that toss-up by posting a 7–1–2 record in their last ten, while Pittsburgh has cooled. But Dallas's run may not hold up to scrutiny. The Stars' PDO of 1.024 sits well above sustainable levels, suggesting some regression ahead. Pittsburgh's luck metric sits at 1.012, marginally healthier. Both teams generate the same expected-goal share at 5v5—51.0% each—but the Penguins own the territorial edge: 50.0% Corsi to Dallas's 47.0%. That's not a dominance margin, but it's the kind of structural advantage that compounds over time.

Goaltending becomes critical. J. Oettinger faces a back-to-back schedule, which means either a backup start or a starter running on fumes—watch the pre-game skate for answers.

Pittsburgh's offense centers on Rickard Rakell, who generates 1.01 expected goals per 60 minutes at 5v5 and has converted at 12.1% (13 goals, 13 assists). Filip Hallander, previously a 1.28 xG/60 threat, is unavailable due to injury, removing a secondary playmaker.

Dallas counters with Jason Robertson, who has scored 25 goals and 21 assists despite an 0.96 expected-goal rate per 60 minutes and just 2 high-danger goals. Michael Bunting, with 8 goals and 14 assists, generates only 0.83 expected goals per 60 minutes on a 7.6% shooting rate, making him a complementary threat at best.

Defensively, Dallas will probe Pittsburgh's weak link in Caleb Jones, while the Penguins should target Tyler Myers on the other end.

The model favors Dallas slightly because its recent surge is real, even if the underlying metrics don't justify it fully. The Penguins hold the structural edge in possession but trail in momentum. This is as close as the league gets to a genuine coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PIT
Filip Hallander0G 3A
1.28 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Rickard Rakell13G 13A
1.01 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.1% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters