Devils steal one from the Senators against the run of play
The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.68–4.18 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The Senators owned this game by every measure except the scoreboard. New Jersey won 4-3 despite trailing in expected goals 4.18–2.68, a 61–39 split that should have belonged to Ottawa. The Senators controlled 54% of shot attempts and 7 high-danger chances to 2. The Devils took the victory anyway.
This was goaltending variance crystallized. J. Markstrom's 0.921 save percentage (35 of 38) ran 1.18 goals ahead of expectation. L. Ullmark's 0.875 mark (28 of 32) ran 1.32 behind. The two-goal swing between the pipes was Ottawa's game surrendered.
The fracture came early in the third period. Cody Glass fired a wrist shot from the slot at 12:24 and the game's momentum shifted. Before that moment, Ottawa had dictated play. After, the Senators chased.
Even Ottawa's finish couldn't compensate. They scored twice from 26 rush attempts while New Jersey converted four from the same 26 chances—a perfect inversion. The Senators created five rebound opportunities, converting one. New Jersey created three and scored zero. The Devils still won.
Ottawa's power play was elite: three goals on 15 shots. Dominance. It mattered less than it should have. The Devils took what they didn't deserve and made it stick. The Senators got robbed.
The danger ladder
OTT went 0-for-54 from low danger on 0.75 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
NJD finished +1.3 against expected, OTT -1.2 — L. Ullmark (OTT) allowed 1.3 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 2-for-23, OTT 3-for-37. NJD scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- NJD stole this one. OTT owned 61% of the xG and lost.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
- L. Ullmark (OTT) gave up 1.3 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
- NJD was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 26 rush chances.
- OTT created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- NJD created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- OTT power play was dominant — 3 PPG on 15 PP shots (0.97 xG).