Motion-blurred skater in a New York Islanders sweater
Breakdown · VGK at NYI

Islanders steal one from the Golden Knights against the run of play

The verdict · stolen

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.90–2.60 and won anyway.

VGK 4 · NYI 5
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 7:55 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

New York won 5–4 in a shootout despite being dominated on expected goals, 2.60 to 4.90. The Islanders engineered this heist through goaltending and rush scoring — a win built on variance favoring goaltender efficiency.

Vegas controlled possession and shot quality. The Golden Knights averaged 0.079 xG per shot against the Islanders' 0.049. New York compensated by attacking in transition: four goals on 29 rush chances beat Vegas's two on 27.

Emil Heineman's wrist shot from the high slot in the shootout proved decisive.

Goaltending was the difference. I. Sorokin stopped 33 of 37 shots (0.892 SV%, +0.90 vs expected), surpassing his workload. C. Hart (VGK) moved the opposite way: 23 saves on 27 shots (0.852 SV%, −1.40 vs expected). Hart surrendered 1.4 more goals than expected.

The underlying counts confirmed Vegas's edge: 37 shot attempts to New York's 27. High-danger chances extended that gap to 9–3. New York created three rebound opportunities (converting none) while Vegas created eight (converting two).

B. Horvat (NYI) led scorers with two goals in 22:19. J. Eichel and M. Stone (VGK) each notched two assists in similar ice time (24:30 and 22:32, respectively).

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · SO · Dec 9
VGK
4
NYI
5

Islanders steal one from the Golden Knights against the run of play

Chances 4.9 – 2.6Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Golden Knights deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
VGK
4.90
NYI
2.60
65% of the chances35%

The board read VGK 4, NYI 5. The chances read VGK 4.9, NYI 2.6.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYI
+2.4
goals above expected
NYI2.60 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
VGK4.90 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored

The Islanders scored 2.4 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 12:02VGKN. Hanifin1–0
  2. P1 16:01VGKM. Marner2–0
  3. P1 19:33NYIB. Horvat2–1
  4. P2 03:56NYIM. Gatcomb2–2
  5. P2 13:30NYIS. Holmstrom2–3
  6. P3 01:27VGKI. Barbashev3–3
  7. P3 10:15NYIB. HorvatPP3–4
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
VGK
55 shots
4
Final
100 shots
NYI
45 shots
5
VGK attackNYI attack
VGK NYI Goal
55
shots · 4 in
45
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
VGKNYI
3 / 9
2.29 xG
High danger
1 / 3
0.71 xG
1 / 19
2.08 xG
Medium
2 / 12
1.17 xG
0 / 34
0.53 xG
Low
1 / 38
0.72 xG

High-danger looks: VGK 3 of 9, NYI 1 of 3.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
I. Sorokin
+0.9
NYI · 33/37
D-
C. Hart
−1.4
VGK · 23/27
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Islanders steal one from the Golden Knights against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 12–13
  1. 12:02VGKN. Hanifin(J. Eichel, S. Theodore)1–0
  2. 16:01VGKM. Marner(K. Korczak, M. Stone)2–0
  3. 19:33NYIB. Horvat(R. Pulock, M. Schaefer)2–1
2ndshots 9–6
  1. 03:56NYIM. Gatcomb(C. Cizikas, K. MacLean)2–2
  2. 13:30NYIS. Holmstrom(C. Ritchie, A. Duclair)2–3
3rdshots 11–8
  1. 01:27VGKI. Barbashev(B. Bowman, J. Eichel)3–3
  2. 10:15NYIB. Horvatpower play(M. Barzal, M. Shabanov)3–4
  3. 19:46VGKP. Dorofeyevpower play(M. Marner, M. Stone)4–4
OTshots 5–0no goals
    SO
    1. 00:00NYIE. Heinemanpower play4–4

    score reads VGK–NYI

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    2.60
    NYI chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +2.4
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    1.011
    NYI puck luck
    About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
    46.1%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    4.90Expected goals2.60
    VGK 65% of the chance quality
    37Shots on goal27
    9High-danger chances3
    62All attempts (Corsi)53
    Adjusted for score: VGK 54% · NYI 46%
    Faceoffs · NYI won44%off52%neu58%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    VGK3 / 9 · 2.29 xG
    NYI1 / 3 · 0.71 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    VGK1 / 19 · 2.08 xG
    NYI2 / 12 · 1.17 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    VGK0 / 34 · 0.53 xG
    NYI1 / 38 · 0.72 xG

    VGK went 1-for-19 from medium danger on 2.08 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    VGK
    4 G · 4.90 xG · -0.9
    NYI
    5 G · 2.60 xG · +2.4
    0123456

    VGK finished -0.9 against expected, NYI +2.4.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    VGK
    WRIST1/23
    SNAP2/12
    SLAP0/6
    TIP IN0/5
    BACKHAND0/2
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    POKE1/1
    BAT0/1
    OTHER0/11
    NYI
    WRIST1/8
    SNAP1/13
    SLAP2/14
    TIP IN0/4
    BACKHAND0/2
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    POKE0/0
    BAT0/0
    OTHER0/12
    VGK
    NYI
    Off the rush
    2 G on 27
    3.03 xG
    4 G on 29
    2.00 xG
    Off rebounds
    2 G on 8
    1.38 xG
    0 G on 3
    0.33 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: VGK went 1-for-23, NYI 1-for-8. NYI scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    C. Hart
    VGK · 23/27 · .852
    -1.4
    saved above expected
    D-
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/30.7-0.3
    Medium2/121.2-0.8
    Low1/380.7-0.3

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    I. Sorokin
    NYI · 33/37 · .892
    +0.9
    saved above expected
    B+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger3/92.3-0.7
    Medium1/192.1+1.1
    Low0/340.5+0.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    100 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    VGK
    55 shots
    4
    Final
    100 shots
    NYI
    45 shots
    5
    VGK attackNYI attack
    VGK NYI Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — VGK left, NYI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    J. Eichel
    #9 · C · VGK
    0 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 24:30 on ice · +1
    M. Stone
    #61 · R · VGK
    0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 22:32 on ice · +2
    B. Horvat
    #14 · C · NYI
    2 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 22:19 on ice · -2
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Tue, Dec 9
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 7:38 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.6-2.4 Vegas win with the Golden Knights at 53% win probability. That qualifies as a genuine coin flip—there's no clarity in the numbers.

    Vegas owns the underlying play. The Golden Knights control 54.0% of expected goals at 5v5, compared to the Islanders' 48.0%. Possession metrics amplify the advantage: Vegas drives the Corsi at 52.0% versus New York's 49.0%. Territorial dominance usually compounds into goals, but the Knights are running ice-cold. Their 0.983 PDO lags well behind neutral; the Islanders' 0.993 sits closer to normal. That imbalance suggests Vegas is the side due for positive regression.

    The Islanders' goaltending introduces a wildcard. C. Hart is on a back-to-back, which typically means either a backup enters or a tired starter gets the workload. Models can't price that uncertainty in.

    Brandon Saad (0.91 xG/60, 3G 6A, 1 HD goal, 4.1% shooting) is marked inactive, removing a layer from Vegas' attack. That leaves Tomas Hertl as the primary engine—0.88 xG/60, 5G 17A, 1 HD goal, 4.3% shooting. For New York, Anders Lee anchors the offense (1.20 xG/60, 9G 20A, 2 HD goals, 6.4% shooting), while Bo Horvat supplies volume (0.87 xG/60, 18G 10A, 3 HD goals, 12.8% shooting). Horvat's 12.8% shooting rate is inflated; regression is waiting.

    Defensively, gaps matter. Rasmus Andersson is Vegas' weak link. Alexander Romanov fills the same role for New York.

    Players to Watch

    • Tomas Hertl (VGK): 0.88 xG/60, 5G 17A, 1 HD goal, 4.3% shooting
    • Anders Lee (NYI): 1.20 xG/60, 9G 20A, 2 HD goals, 6.4% shooting
    • Bo Horvat (NYI): 0.87 xG/60, 18G 10A, 3 HD goals, 12.8% shooting

    Vegas holds the edge in underlying play and should benefit from PDO bounce. But goaltending uncertainty and New York's scoring depth—particularly Lee—narrow the margin. Vegas at a slim favorite.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    VGK 53%
    53%
    VGK
    Model favorite
    53%
    47%
    VGK50NYI

    VGK by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score VGK 2.6–2.4 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    VGK← edge
    edge →NYI
    54.0%48.0%
    52.0%49.0%
    2.522.48
    2.112.69
    2.121.78
    2.101.94
    0.9830.993

    VGK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.983 vs 0.993) says NYI has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    VGK
    6-2-2
    +1 GD · 1d rest
    NYI
    5-4-1
    +2 GD · 2d rest
    0.983
    VGK PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    0.993
    NYI PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
    • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    Regression watch
    • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
    • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    • C. Hart is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    VGK
    Expected in goal
    C. Hart
    back-to-back.917 last start
    Backup Akira Schmid · -1.0 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    NYI
    Expected in goal
    D. Rittich
    2 days rest.897 last start
    Backup Ilya Sorokin · +25.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    VGK
    Brandon Saad3G 6A
    0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
    Tomas Hertl5G 17A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
    NYI
    Anders Lee9G 20A
    1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
    Bo Horvat18G 10A
    0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next