Backcheck
Recap · SJS at PHI

Flyers run the Sharks off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:40 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
SJS
San Jose Sharks
1
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

1.95Expected goals3.72
66% share for the better side
18Shot attempts (SOG)30
2High-danger chances7
38Corsi (all attempts)62
Score-adjusted: 40% / 60%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The 4-1 Flyers win understated the dominance: Philadelphia controlled 66% of 5v5 expected goals, a gap so vast that the scoreline felt generous to San Jose. The Sharks didn't just lose the possession battle—they underperformed their own already-poor metrics by 0.95 goals, suggesting even their limited chances didn't materialize.

Philadelphia's control was total. They held 62% of shot attempts (30–18 on goal), edged high-danger chances 7–2, and converted the rush with terrifying efficiency—3 goals on just 21 chances. D. Vladar, the Flyers' goaltender, made 17 saves on 18 shots, beating his expected performance by 0.95 goals.

The goaltending split told a story. A. Nedeljkovic stopped 26 of 29 for San Jose, a 0.897 save percentage that exceeded his expected mark by 0.72 goals—respectable work against a relentless opponent. But it couldn't matter. The Sharks created little, and what little they did create didn't find the net.

Travis Konecny's wrist shot from the wing (P3, 18:17) was the turning point—a moment that codified what the numbers had been saying all night: San Jose had no answer.

The Three Stars:

  • C. Dvorak (PHI) — 1G, 1A in 19:01
  • T. Konecny (PHI) — 1G, 1A in 17:26
  • J. Drysdale (PHI) — 1A in 23:15
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
SJS0 / 2 · 0.62 xG
PHI1 / 7 · 1.70 xG
Medium dangermid-range
SJS1 / 9 · 0.90 xG
PHI2 / 12 · 1.37 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
SJS0 / 27 · 0.43 xG
PHI1 / 43 · 0.66 xG

PHI went 1-for-7 from high danger on 1.70 expected goals — 0.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
SJS
1 G · 1.95 xG · -0.9
PHI
4 G · 3.72 xG · +0.3
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. NedeljkovicSJS
+0.7
D. VladarPHI
+0.9

SJS finished -0.9 against expected, PHI +0.3 — D. Vladar (PHI) saved 0.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
SJS
WRIST0/15
SNAP1/4
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/12
PHI
WRIST2/20
SNAP0/10
SLAP0/2
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND1/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/20
SJS
PHI
Off the rush
1 G on 17 · 1.68 xG
3 G on 21 · 2.15 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 0 · 0.00 xG
0 G on 7 · 0.97 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: SJS went 0-for-15, PHI 2-for-20. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Dvorak
#22 · C · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 19:01 TOI · +1
T. Konecny
#11 · R · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:26 TOI · +1
J. Drysdale
#9 · D · PHI
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 23:15 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • PHI created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · SJS at PHI · 7:00 PM ET

Sharks at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 7:39 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
PHI
Model favorite
45%
55%
SJS50PHI

PHI by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score SJS 2.32.5 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

SJS← edge
edge →PHI
48.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
47.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.33xGF / 602.26
2.56xGA / 602.20
1.99Goals for / gm1.96
2.32Goals against / gm1.82
0.998PDO — luck, not skill1.008

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.998 vs 1.008) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

San Jose projects to 2.3 goals, Philadelphia to 2.5, and the Flyers are favored at 55% win probability—marginally better odds in what is essentially a pick'em.

The edge belongs to the team that owns the territorial game. Philadelphia leads 51.0% xG to San Jose's 48.0% at 5v5, a meaningful advantage in sustained pressure. Their 48.0% Corsi to San Jose's 47.0% is essentially a wash on volume, but the underlying shot quality favors the Flyers. San Jose's -7 goal differential over their last ten flags their execution gap; Philadelphia's 1.008 PDO to San Jose's 0.998 also tilts toward the Flyers.

The Sharks' offensive firepower hinges on Pavol Regenda. He carries 1.10 xG/60, has five goals and an assist, and shoots at 16.1%—among the most efficient in the league. But there's a catch: Regenda is marked likely out for this one, which removes San Jose's primary attacking fulcrum. Igor Chernyshov becomes the alternative. He generates 0.91 xG/60, has six goals and eight assists, and maintains a 15.0% shooting rate. As San Jose's defensive weak link, he'll invite attention from the Flyers' forecheck.

Philadelphia counters with two midrange contributors. Owen Tippett leads with 19 goals, 18 assists, and 0.88 xG/60, two of his goals earned at high danger. Christian Dvorak carries 12 goals, 21 assists, and 0.81 xG/60, with three high-danger goals. As the Flyers' defensive weak link, he represents San Jose's best opportunity to exploit soft coverage. The depth the Flyers bring in this range gives them an edge in attrition; San Jose's lack of reinforcement when Regenda sits may prove decisive.

Philadelphia's slight territorial advantage and San Jose's roster questions tilt toward the Flyers—but not by much.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters