Backcheck
Recap · FLA at COL

Avalanche run the Panthers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Avalanche earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 8:05 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
FLA
Florida Panthers
2
Home
COL
Colorado Avalanche
6
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.43Expected goals4.59
65% share for the better side
25Shot attempts (SOG)42
4High-danger chances5
53Corsi (all attempts)72
Score-adjusted: 47% / 53%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado ran the scoreboard up beyond what the underlying metrics prescribed—a 6-2 victory that inflated their 65% expected-goals edge. The overperformance (1.41 goals above xG) made the 4.59–2.43 expected-goal gap look like a rout. Yet the underlying indicators confirmed dominance: 63% of shot attempts (42–25) and high-danger chances 5–4.

Shot quality was the real separator. Colorado generated 0.064 xG per shot; Florida managed 0.046. The Avalanche converted 3 goals on 30 rush chances while Florida got 2 on 19. Precision mattered as much as volume.

Goaltending told a complementary story. D. Tarasov faced 42 shots, saved 36, and posted a 0.857 SV% that cost Florida 1.41 goals versus expectation. M. Blackwood (23/25, 0.920 SV%) performed to his workload. The gap in execution compounded across the night.

Colorado's rebound game showed their net-front intensity. They generated 8 rebound opportunities and converted 2. Florida created 3 and converted none—leaving second chances untaken.

One turning point: Mackie Samoskevich's snap shot from the doorstep at 13:08 of the third period separated what had tightened as the game went.

Three Stars

  • #29 N. MacKinnon (COL)—1G, 1A in 19:34
  • #70 S. Malinski (COL)—1G, 1A in 17:53
  • #88 M. Necas (COL)—2A in 17:14
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
FLA1 / 4 · 0.90 xG
COL1 / 5 · 1.55 xG
Medium dangermid-range
FLA1 / 10 · 1.08 xG
COL3 / 22 · 2.41 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
FLA0 / 39 · 0.45 xG
COL2 / 45 · 0.64 xG

COL went 2-for-45 from low danger on 0.64 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
FLA
2 G · 2.43 xG · -0.4
COL
6 G · 4.59 xG · +1.4
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. TarasovFLA
-1.4
M. BlackwoodCOL
+0.4

FLA finished -0.4 against expected, COL +1.4 — D. Tarasov (FLA) allowed 1.4 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
FLA
WRIST1/19
BACKHAND0/4
SNAP1/3
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/3
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/1
OTHER0/19
COL
WRIST4/35
BACKHAND2/5
SNAP0/6
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/5
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/0
OTHER0/15
FLA
COL
Off the rush
2 G on 19 · 1.77 xG
3 G on 30 · 3.28 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.45 xG
2 G on 8 · 0.91 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: FLA went 1-for-19, COL 4-for-35. COL scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
N. MacKinnon
#29 · C · COL
1 G · 1 A · 7 SOG · 19:34 TOI · +2
S. Malinski
#70 · D · COL
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 17:53 TOI · +2
M. Necas
#88 · C · COL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 17:14 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Tarasov (FLA) gave up 1.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • COL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.064 xG/shot vs 0.046. Quality over quantity.
  • COL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 30 rush chances.
  • FLA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 19 rush chances.
  • COL created 8 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • FLA created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · FLA at COL · 9:30 PM ET

The Avalanche are the model's lean over the Panthers — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 8:03 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

59%
COL
Model favorite
41%
59%
FLA50COL

COL by 18 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score FLA 2.42.9 COL; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

FLA← edge
edge →COL
49.0%5v5 xG%57.0%
52.0%Corsi%57.0%
2.48xGF / 603.03
2.56xGA / 602.30
1.98Goals for / gm2.63
2.21Goals against / gm1.56
0.989PDO — luck, not skill1.021

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.989 vs 1.021) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Colorado is the clear favorite. The model projects a 2.4-2.9 goal game with the Avalanche at 59% win probability.

The Avalanche dominate the underlying play. At 5v5, they generate a 57.0% expected goals share against Florida's 49.0%—an eight-point gap that indicates consistent superiority in chance creation. They also drive Corsi at 57.0%, meaning the play consistently tilts toward Colorado's end.

Here's the catch: Colorado's PDO is 1.021. That's a hot-running efficiency metric, and regression is the expectation. Florida sits at 0.989, which historically suggests mean reversion favors the Panthers. If Colorado's conversion rates normalize to their underlying quality, the model's advantage shrinks considerably.

Players to Watch

Florida:

  • Sam Bennett: 0.97 xG/60, 18G 19A, 6 high-danger goals, 13.1% shooting
  • Brad Marchand: 0.93 xG/60, 17G 9A, 3 high-danger goals, 19.5% shooting

Colorado:

  • Artturi Lehkonen: 1.11 xG/60, 18G 22A, 6 high-danger goals, 14.9% shooting
  • Ross Colton: 1.10 xG/60, 7G 15A, 1 high-danger goal, 4.9% shooting

Bennett and Marchand carry Florida's offensive load, while Lehkonen anchors Colorado's attack at 1.11 xG/60. The Avalanche's territorial dominance should translate to wins, but if Florida's skill players hold their efficiency while Colorado's regresses, the margin compresses.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters