Backcheck
Recap · PHI at CAR

Hurricanes edge the Flyers in a shootout

The Hurricanes won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 8:27 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
2
Home
CAR
Carolina Hurricanes
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.86Expected goals3.88
50% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)32
8High-danger chances3
49Corsi (all attempts)80
Score-adjusted: 41% / 59%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Philadelphia had the better looks. Eight high-danger chances to Carolina's 3; a 0.079 expected goal rate per shot versus 0.048. The Flyers' power play was lethal—2 goals on 16 chances, a 1.64 xG rate. Yet the Hurricanes won 3-2 in a shootout, sealed by Andrei Svechnikov's backhander.

Expected goals finished nearly even: 3.88–3.86 in the Hurricanes' favor. That narrow gap masks the underlying split. The Flyers attacked the slot; Carolina operated from distance and capitalized on the rush—2 goals on 43 chances.

Both teams underperformed in regulation. The Flyers squandered 1.86 goals of expected value; the Hurricanes surrendered 0.88. Philadelphia crashed the net for 6 rebounds but converted none.

Carolina controlled 55% of shot attempts (32–26 on goal) despite the Flyers' quality advantage. D. Vladar (PHI) made 30 of 32 saves at a 0.938 clip, +1.88 versus expected. B. Bussi (CAR) stopped 24 of 26, 0.923 SV%, +1.86 above expected. The shootout proved decisive.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI1 / 8 · 1.85 xG
CAR0 / 3 · 0.63 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI0 / 14 · 1.55 xG
CAR1 / 22 · 2.26 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI1 / 27 · 0.45 xG
CAR1 / 55 · 0.98 xG

PHI went 0-for-14 from medium danger on 1.55 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
2 G · 3.86 xG · -1.9
CAR
3 G · 3.88 xG · -0.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
+1.9
B. BussiCAR
+1.9

PHI finished -1.9 against expected, CAR -0.9 — D. Vladar (PHI) saved 1.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST0/20
SNAP2/10
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/10
CAR
WRIST1/28
SNAP0/11
TIP IN1/8
SLAP0/9
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/20
PHI
CAR
Off the rush
0 G on 23 · 2.13 xG
2 G on 43 · 3.15 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 0.84 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.24 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 0-for-20, CAR 1-for-28. CAR scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
T. Zegras
#46 · C · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 22:39 TOI · +1
J. Drysdale
#9 · D · PHI
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 25:36 TOI
S. Walker
#26 · D · CAR
0 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 24:00 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Vladar (PHI) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • PHI had the higher quality looks — 0.079 xG/shot vs 0.048.
  • CAR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 43 rush chances.
  • PHI created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CAR underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • PHI underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Vladar (PHI) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • B. Bussi (CAR) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • PHI power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 16 PP shots (1.64 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at CAR · 5:00 PM ET

The Hurricanes are the model's lean over the Flyers — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 8:44 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

57%
CAR
Model favorite
43%
57%
PHI50CAR

CAR by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score PHI 2.32.7 CAR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →CAR
51.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
48.0%Corsi%60.0%
2.26xGF / 602.98
2.20xGA / 602.31
1.96Goals for / gm2.26
1.82Goals against / gm1.95
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.984

CAR holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.984) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model backs Carolina at 57% win probability in a projected 2.3–2.7 game. The pick rests on underlying dominance and a coming PDO correction.

The Hurricanes own this matchup at 5v5 play. Carolina generates 56.0% expected goals to Philadelphia's 51.0%, and drives territory at 60.0% Corsi against the Flyers' 48.0%. That dominance across both metrics signals sustained pressure—Carolina's defense-first structure leans the play toward control.

PDO is where regression lives. Carolina runs at 0.984, below baseline and due for positive drift. Philadelphia sits at 1.008, betting on unsustainable luck. Over one game that signal is noise; across a series it tilts edges.

Philadelphia concentrates its offensive load on Owen Tippett, who operates at 0.88 expected goals per 60 minutes with 19 goals and 18 assists. He has generated 2 high-danger chances at 12.1% shooting—he is the Flyers' primary offensive engine. Christian Dvorak operates at 0.81 xG/60 with 12 goals and 21 assists, more playmaker than scorer, though he has also converted 3 high-danger opportunities at 11.2%.

Carolina distributes offensive threat across its top two. Jackson Blake generates 1.06 xG/60 with 14 goals and 19 assists, backed by 2 high-danger chances at 10.9%. Seth Jarvis carries 17 goals and 12 assists at 0.98 xG/60, though he has converted only 1 high-danger chance while shooting 11.9%.

The depth edge matters. Carolina can control play without riding a single scorer. Philadelphia needs Tippett exceptional. That asymmetry—plus the PDO math—is where the model finds its lean.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
CAR
Jackson Blake14G 19A
1.06 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.9% sh
Seth Jarvis17G 12A
0.98 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters