Backcheck
Recap · UTA at PIT

Mammoth run the Penguins off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Mammoth earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 8:24 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
UTA
Utah Mammoth
5
Home
PIT
Pittsburgh Penguins
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.58Expected goals1.37
72% share for the better side
36Shot attempts (SOG)16
1High-danger chances0
77Corsi (all attempts)30
Score-adjusted: 75% / 25%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Pittsburgh's elite finishing kept this close—they scored four goals on just 1.37 expected goals, outperforming prediction by 2.63 goals. But Utah's dominance prevailed: they controlled 72% of 5v5 expected goals (3.58–1.37) and won 5-4 in overtime.

Utah's volume was overwhelming. They generated 36 attempts to Pittsburgh's 16, creating one high-danger chance to zero. S. Murashov's 0.861 save percentage on 36 shots and K. Vejmelka's 0.750 on 16 reflected the workload disparity. Dylan Guenther's wrist shot from the top of the circles at 00:42 of overtime decided it.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
UTA0 / 1 · 0.31 xG
PIT0 / 0 · 0.00 xG
Medium dangermid-range
UTA2 / 20 · 2.29 xG
PIT3 / 9 · 0.96 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
UTA3 / 56 · 0.99 xG
PIT1 / 21 · 0.42 xG

PIT went 3-for-9 from medium danger on 0.96 expected goals — 2.0 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
UTA
5 G · 3.58 xG · +1.4
PIT
4 G · 1.37 xG · +2.6
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
K. VejmelkaUTA
-2.6
S. MurashovPIT
-1.4

UTA finished +1.4 against expected, PIT +2.6 — K. Vejmelka (UTA) allowed 2.6 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
UTA
WRIST5/44
TIP IN0/7
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/1
SNAP0/0
OTHER0/18
PIT
WRIST1/14
TIP IN1/3
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND2/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/0
SNAP0/1
OTHER0/8
UTA
PIT
Off the rush
4 G on 38 · 2.37 xG
4 G on 16 · 1.13 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.45 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.06 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: UTA went 5-for-44, PIT 1-for-14. UTA scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Kindel
#81 · C · PIT
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 16:23 TOI · +2
J. Brazeau
#16 · R · PIT
2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 14:12 TOI · +1
M. Carcone
#53 · L · UTA
2 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 12:20 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • K. Vejmelka (UTA) gave up 2.6 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • UTA scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • PIT was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 16 rush chances.
  • UTA was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 38 rush chances.
  • UTA created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PIT outperformed their expected goals by 2.6 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · UTA at PIT · 3:00 PM ET

Mammoth at Penguins: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 8:21 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
PIT
Model favorite
49%
51%
UTA50PIT

PIT by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score UTA 2.62.6 PIT; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

UTA← edge
edge →PIT
52.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
53.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.64xGF / 602.66
2.39xGA / 602.55
2.26Goals for / gm2.45
1.99Goals against / gm2.12
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.012

UTA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.012) says PIT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects 2.6 goals for each team, with Pittsburgh at 51% to win—as close to a pick'em as the numbers offer. This game has no strong conviction either way.

Recent momentum tilts toward the Penguins, who are 4-2-4 in their last ten. But Utah's season-long underlying numbers cut deeper: they own 53.0% Corsi and 52.0% expected goals share at 5v5, suggesting territory and shot volume they've earned. Pittsburgh counters with 51.0% xG and 50.0% Corsi that bends closer to even.

A. Silovs starts for Utah on a back-to-back—fatigue matters in net. K. Vejmelka does the same for Pittsburgh, which means both teams face the same fraying resource. Neither side gets a rest advantage here.

Dylan Guenther is Utah's offensive engine: 1.02 expected goals per 60 minutes, 28 goals, 15 assists, and a 16.8% shooting rate anchored by three high-danger chances. Daniil But generates 1.01 xG/60 but has fired only 2 goals on 2 assists with a 5.6% shooting rate—the talent is there, the finish is missing.

Pittsburgh's Filip Hallander is likely out, recalled from an AHL conditioning loan pending further evaluation. That removes a 1.28 xG/60 weapon. Rickard Rakell absorbs that loss with 1.01 xG/60, 13 goals, 13 assists, and 3 high-danger goals at 12.1% shooting. He's been consistent; Guenther just has more ceiling.

Both offenses struggle to convert high-danger chances into goals—neither team has scored on rebounds or high-danger opportunities at rates you'd expect from their shot quality. Utah's defensive weak spot is Maveric Lamoureux. Pittsburgh's is Caleb Jones. In a game this tight, those weak links will see pressure.

The PDO edge to Pittsburgh (1.012 vs 1.003) hints at small-sample noise playing into their numbers rather than deep talent, but it's noise that's won them games lately.

This isn't a blowout waiting to happen. Utah should control pace and territory. Pittsburgh should survive on the back of recent execution. The Penguins' narrow win probability reflects that—they're favored, but not by much. Take the points and expect a grind.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

UTA
Dylan Guenther28G 15A
1.02 xG/60 · 3 HD · 16.8% sh
Daniil But2G 2A
1.01 xG/60 · 1 HD · 5.6% sh
PIT
Filip Hallander0G 3A
1.28 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Rickard Rakell13G 13A
1.01 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters