Backcheck
Recap · EDM at MTL

J. Dobes stands tall as the Canadiens edge the Oilers

The Canadiens earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 8:26 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
EDM
Edmonton Oilers
1
Home
MTL
Montreal Canadiens
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.08Expected goals4.90
55% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)27
7High-danger chances7
57Corsi (all attempts)49
Score-adjusted: 58% / 42%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Canadiens beat Edmonton 4–1, but the underlying metrics suggested it should have been closer. High-danger chances tied 7–7. Expected goals split 4.90–4.08, barely favoring Montreal. J. Dobes made the difference: 27 of 28 stops (0.964 SV%, +3.08 vs. expected)—enough to swing the entire game.

C. Pickard was solid (23/27, 0.852 SV%, +0.90) but couldn't match that performance.

Montreal's edge was quality over quantity. The Canadiens averaged 0.100 expected goals per shot versus Edmonton's 0.072. On the rush, Montreal buried 4 of 21 chances while Edmonton couldn't convert its 7 high-danger opportunities. The Oilers did crash the net hard, generating 5 rebound opportunities, though they converted just one.

The Canadiens' power play was lethal: 2 goals on 12 shots (1.93 expected goals).

The turning point was Alexandre Texier's snap shot from the high slot at 13:52 of the third period.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
EDM0 / 7 · 1.74 xG
MTL1 / 7 · 2.90 xG
Medium dangermid-range
EDM1 / 17 · 1.91 xG
MTL3 / 15 · 1.73 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
EDM0 / 33 · 0.43 xG
MTL0 / 27 · 0.27 xG

MTL went 1-for-7 from high danger on 2.90 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
EDM
1 G · 4.08 xG · -3.1
MTL
4 G · 4.90 xG · -0.9
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
C. PickardEDM
+0.9
J. DobesMTL
+3.1

EDM finished -3.1 against expected, MTL -0.9 — J. Dobes (MTL) saved 3.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
EDM
SNAP1/34
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
WRIST0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/12
MTL
SNAP3/24
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED1/1
WRIST0/2
POKE0/1
OTHER0/13
EDM
MTL
Off the rush
0 G on 25 · 2.49 xG
4 G on 21 · 2.99 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5 · 1.02 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.39 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: EDM went 1-for-34, MTL 3-for-24. MTL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
L. Hutson
#48 · D · MTL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 21:17 TOI
J. Slafkovský
#20 · L · MTL
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 16:28 TOI
E. Bouchard
#2 · D · EDM
0 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 29:49 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Dobes (MTL) stopped 3.1 goals above expected.
  • MTL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.100 xG/shot vs 0.072. Quality over quantity.
  • EDM couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • MTL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • EDM created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • EDM underperformed xG by 3.1 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Dobes (MTL) saved 3.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • J. Dobes was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
  • MTL power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 12 PP shots (1.93 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · EDM at MTL · 7:00 PM ET

Oilers at Canadiens: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 8:25 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
EDM
Model favorite
51%
49%
EDM50MTL

EDM by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score EDM 2.62.6 MTL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

EDM← edge
edge →MTL
52.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
50.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.64xGF / 602.41
2.47xGA / 602.62
2.13Goals for / gm2.24
2.29Goals against / gm1.96
0.982PDO — luck, not skill1.018

EDM holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.982 vs 1.018) says MTL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The models can't pick a side. Edmonton projects to 51% win probability in a 2.6-2.6 game — about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The Oilers own the underlying play. Their 52.0% 5v5 expected-goals share against Montreal's 48.0% suggests they're generating more quality chances. Edmonton's Corsi sits at 50.0% to the Canadiens' 49.0%, confirming shot volume dominance. But the PDO numbers complicate the read: Montreal is running hot at 1.018 (converting at rates that won't stick), while Edmonton sits cold at 0.982. The underlying edge combined with positive regression potential should favor Edmonton — yet Montreal's actual goal-scoring has carried them despite not owning the shot battle.

This game hinges on elite wings playing out of their minds.

Connor McDavid is generating 0.92 expected goals per 60 minutes while maintaining a 13.7% shooting percentage. With 25 goals and 33 assists, he's been simultaneously efficient and productive. Zach Hyman operates at 1.23 xG/60, a pace that ranks among the league's most dangerous forwards, and he's converted at 13.0% to reach 14 goals and 13 assists — showing he's not just riding volume.

Montreal counters with Cole Caufield, who's posted 33 goals and 16 assists on a 20.0% shooting rate, a figure that blends luck and genuine finishing. At 0.97 xG/60, he's not generating McDavid's volume, yet he's been Montreal's most lethal weapon. Oliver Kapanen adds secondary punch at 0.83 xG/60 with 19 goals and 12 assists on a 17.8% shooting rate.

The defensive vulnerabilities matter here. Edmonton's Jake Walman and Montreal's Mike Matheson represent the points where this matchup bends. Both teams sit at 0% high-danger goal rates, suggesting shot quality variance is masking true danger — meaning performances on the perimeter, where these defensemen live, become unusually decisive.

This is a genuinely even matchup. Edmonton's underlying metrics favor the Oilers; regression math favors the Oilers. But Montreal's results say they belong. At 51 percent, the model isn't wrong.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

EDM
Zach Hyman14G 13A
1.23 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.0% sh
Connor McDavid25G 33A
0.92 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Oliver Kapanen19G 12A
0.83 xG/60 · 4 HD · 17.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters