Backcheck
Recap · BUF at SEA

A. Lyon stands tall as the Sabres edge the Kraken

The Sabres won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 8:28 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
BUF
Buffalo Sabres
3
Home
SEA
Seattle Kraken
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.79Expected goals3.91
51% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)24
3High-danger chances6
54Corsi (all attempts)62
Score-adjusted: 43% / 57%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Sabres beat the Kraken 3-1 in a game where shot volume favored Seattle but goaltending and chance quality decided it. The Kraken held 51% of shot attempts (24–23), yet produced little when it mattered most: zero high-danger chances converted, with only 3 such opportunities compared to Buffalo's 6.

A. Lyon was the margin. The Buffalo goalie stopped 23 of 24 shots (0.958 SV%) and saved 2.91 goals above expected, blanking the Kraken on all six high-danger attempts. J. Daccord made 20 of 22 saves (0.909 SV%) but faced harder finish — the Sabres buried 3 goals on 28 rush chances, a lethal pace that overcame his above-expected performance (+1.79).

Expected goals painted Seattle's frustration: the Kraken generated 3.91 xG to Buffalo's 3.79, yet trailed 3-1. Variance told the real story — Seattle underperformed their xG by 2.91 goals, Buffalo underperformed theirs by 0.79, meaning the Sabres were vastly more efficient with inferior underlying play.

The turning point arrived at 19:14 of the third period: Zach Benson's wrist shot from the top of the circles put Buffalo up for good.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
BUF2 / 3 · 1.26 xG
SEA0 / 6 · 1.57 xG
Medium dangermid-range
BUF0 / 16 · 1.90 xG
SEA1 / 14 · 1.60 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
BUF1 / 35 · 0.63 xG
SEA0 / 42 · 0.73 xG

BUF went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.90 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
BUF
3 G · 3.79 xG · -0.8
SEA
1 G · 3.91 xG · -2.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. LyonBUF
+2.9
J. DaccordSEA
+1.8

BUF finished -0.8 against expected, SEA -2.9 — A. Lyon (BUF) saved 2.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
BUF
WRIST3/23
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/4
SNAP0/4
BACKHAND0/2
BAT0/1
OTHER0/14
SEA
WRIST1/30
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/5
SNAP0/4
BACKHAND0/4
BAT0/0
OTHER0/15
BUF
SEA
Off the rush
3 G on 28 · 2.86 xG
1 G on 31 · 2.59 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.46 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.85 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: BUF went 3-for-23, SEA 1-for-30. BUF scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Tuch
#89 · R · BUF
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 17:07 TOI · +2
V. Dunn
#29 · D · SEA
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 21:15 TOI · -2
T. Thompson
#72 · C · BUF
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 20:35 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Lyon (BUF) stopped 2.9 goals above expected.
  • SEA couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • BUF was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • SEA created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • SEA underperformed xG by 2.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • A. Lyon (BUF) saved 2.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • A. Lyon was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
  • J. Daccord (SEA) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · BUF at SEA · 8:00 PM ET

Sabres at Kraken: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 8:25 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
BUF
Model favorite
51%
49%
BUF50SEA

BUF by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score BUF 2.52.5 SEA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

BUF← edge
edge →SEA
50.0%5v5 xG%46.0%
49.0%Corsi%45.0%
2.55xGF / 602.13
2.55xGA / 602.51
2.35Goals for / gm1.87
1.90Goals against / gm1.95
1.020PDO — luck, not skill1.011

BUF holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.020 vs 1.011) says BUF has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.5 game with Buffalo at 51% win probability—a genuine pick'em.

Buffalo owns the underlying play. The Sabres' 5v5 xG sits at 50.0% against Seattle's 46.0%, translating to superior shot quality. Corsi tells the same story: Buffalo's 49.0% reflects consistent territorial control, the kind of edge that compounds through a full game.

Recent form doesn't favor either team. Seattle is -14 on goal differential over their last 10 games—a steep slide. Buffalo sits at -6 over the same stretch, making them the comparatively stable option.

Here's where Buffalo's advantage weakens: the Sabres are running hot. Their season PDO of 1.020 means luck is currently working in their favor. Regression is inevitable. Seattle's 1.011 PDO hovers closer to what sticks, so if the game tightens in the third, that advantage dissolves.

Watch P. Grubauer. On a back-to-back, Seattle may start a backup or lean on a tired starter—a weakness Buffalo's top line should exploit.

Players to Watch

Jason Zucker drives Buffalo's edge: 1.07 xG/60, 14 goals, 14 assists, 6 hard-damage goals, and 15.1% shooting. Josh Doan (15 goals, 18 assists, 1.01 xG/60) operates as the secondary option with 2 hard-damage goals and 11.5% shooting.

Shane Wright anchors Seattle with 0.77 xG/60, 8 goals, 10 assists, and 4 hard-damage goals. Berkly Catton (6 goals, 8 assists, 0.68 xG/60) chips in with 5 hard-damage goals and 8.8% shooting but lacks Zucker's consistency.

Neither team has found second-chance efficiency—both register 0% on hard-damage and rebound goals. Buffalo's Jack Quinn and Seattle's Chandler Stephenson are the defensive weak links.

Buffalo should control play. Whether territorial advantage becomes goals before regression catches up is the real question. This is a coin flip—one where the team weathering recent struggles better gets the narrow edge.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

BUF
Jason Zucker14G 14A
1.07 xG/60 · 6 HD · 15.1% sh
Josh Doan15G 18A
1.01 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.5% sh
SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters