Flames run the Kraken off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Flames earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Flames' 4–2 win was more decisive than the scoreline suggests: they controlled 64% of expected goals at 5v5 (4.36–2.46). Calgary dominated in possession metrics. Shot attempts ran 46–23 in their favor, and high-danger chances split 3–2 for Calgary.
Efficiency was the difference. The Flames scored on rush chances at an exceptional rate—4 goals on 33 opportunities. Seattle managed 2 goals on 21 rush chances, a gap that reflected Calgary's pace.
The goaltending was uneven. J. Daccord (SEA) made 42 saves on 45 shots (0.933 SV%), stopping 1.36 goals above expected—elite work wasted in defeat. D. Wolf (CGY) made 21 saves on 23 shots (0.913 SV%), solid but overshadowed by the Flames' dominance.
Mikael Backlund's backhander from the slot at 19:52 of the third punctuated Calgary's control when the game was already decided.
The danger ladder
SEA went 1-for-16 from medium danger on 1.74 expected goals — 0.7 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
SEA finished -0.5 against expected, CGY -0.4 — J. Daccord (SEA) saved 1.4 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: SEA went 0-for-14, CGY 1-for-37. CGY scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- J. Daccord (SEA) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
- CGY was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 33 rush chances.
- SEA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
- CGY created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.