Motion-blurred skater in a blue sweater
Breakdown · NYR at STL

Rangers edge the Blues in overtime

The verdict · earned

The Rangers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NYR 2 · STL 1
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 8:59 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Rangers' dominance in high-danger chances—6 to 3—should have delivered a more convincing victory than a one-goal overtime result. New York failed to convert any of those chances, shifting the win's burden to variance: I. Shesterkin's exceptional goaltending and fortune on the rush.

Expected goals split 3.08–3.36, a near-tie that suggested the game would be close. The Blues held 47% of shot attempts yet underperformed their 3.08 xG by 2.08 goals, a massive shortfall that even J. Binnington's excellence could not rescue. The Rangers underperformed their 3.36 xG by 1.36, a tighter margin that reflected their ability to find goals outside the high-danger window.

J. Binnington stopped all six high-danger shots Rangers generated—100% SV on the most dangerous looks. New York found both its goals instead through the rush (2 on 29 attempts), a higher-variance avenue that overcame disciplined positioning. J.T. Miller's wrist shot from the top of the circles at 02:21 of overtime decided the contest.

I. Shesterkin's 0.963 save percentage was the decisive factor. He saved 2.08 goals above expected, more than the single-goal margin of victory—evidence that New York's win depended on exceptional goaltending, not superior play. An overtime result where variance trumped underlying quality.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Dec 18
NYR
2
STL
1

Rangers edge the Blues in overtime

Chances 3.4 – 3.1Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Rangers took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
NYR
3.36
STL
3.08
52% of the chances48%

The board read NYR 2, STL 1. The chances read NYR 3.4, STL 3.1.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYR
−1.4
goals above expected
NYR3.36 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored
STL3.08 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Blues left 2.1 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 18:58STLJ. Berggren0–1
  2. P2 06:02NYRG. PerreaultPP1–1
  3. OT 02:21NYRJ. Miller2–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYR
44 shots
2
Final
83 shots
STL
39 shots
1
NYR attackSTL attack
NYR STL Goal
44
shots · 2 in
39
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYRSTL
0 / 6
1.40 xG
High danger
0 / 3
0.62 xG
1 / 9
1.10 xG
Medium
1 / 16
1.93 xG
1 / 38
0.86 xG
Low
0 / 37
0.53 xG

The Blues went 0 for 3 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
I. Shesterkin
+2.1
NYR · 26/27
B+
J. Binnington
+1.4
STL · 29/31
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Rangers edge the Blues in overtime

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–5
  1. 18:58STLJ. Berggren(D. Dvorsky)0–1
2ndshots 15–10
  1. 06:02NYRG. Perreaultpower play(W. Cuylle, N. Laba)1–1
3rdshots 5–11no goals
    OTshots 1–1
    1. 02:21NYRJ. Miller(V. Trocheck, V. Gavrikov)2–1

    score reads NYR–STL

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    3.36
    NYR chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    −1.4
    Finishing
    Goals below what those chances were worth
    1.020
    NYR puck luck
    About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
    48.6%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    3.36Expected goals3.08
    NYR 52% of the chance quality
    31Shots on goal27
    6High-danger chances3
    53All attempts (Corsi)56
    Adjusted for score: NYR 49% · STL 51%
    Faceoffs · STL won56%off56%neu44%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    NYR0 / 6 · 1.40 xG
    STL0 / 3 · 0.62 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    NYR1 / 9 · 1.10 xG
    STL1 / 16 · 1.93 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    NYR1 / 38 · 0.86 xG
    STL0 / 37 · 0.53 xG

    NYR went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.40 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    NYR
    2 G · 3.36 xG · -1.4
    STL
    1 G · 3.08 xG · -2.1
    01234

    NYR finished -1.4 against expected, STL -2.1.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    NYR
    WRIST1/25
    TIP IN0/5
    SLAP0/6
    SNAP0/2
    BACKHAND0/2
    DEFLECTED1/4
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    BAT0/0
    OTHER0/9
    STL
    WRIST1/18
    TIP IN0/6
    SLAP0/4
    SNAP0/6
    BACKHAND0/3
    DEFLECTED0/0
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    BAT0/1
    OTHER0/17
    NYR
    STL
    Off the rush
    2 G on 29
    2.51 xG
    1 G on 27
    2.40 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 3
    0.29 xG
    0 G on 1
    0.21 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-25, STL 1-for-18. NYR scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    I. Shesterkin
    NYR · 26/27 · .963
    +2.1
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/30.6+0.6
    Medium1/161.9+0.9
    Low0/370.5+0.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    J. Binnington
    STL · 29/31 · .935
    +1.4
    saved above expected
    B+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/61.4+1.4
    Medium1/91.1+0.1
    Low1/380.9-0.1

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    83 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    NYR
    44 shots
    2
    Final
    83 shots
    STL
    39 shots
    1
    NYR attackSTL attack
    NYR STL Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, STL right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    V. Gavrikov
    #44 · D · NYR
    0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 26:36 on ice
    V. Trocheck
    #16 · C · NYR
    0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 22:49 on ice
    J. Miller
    #8 · C · NYR
    1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 20:57 on ice
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Thu, Dec 18
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 8:54 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects this as a near-perfect pick'em: expect a 2.3-to-2.5-goal range, with the Blues favored at 53% win probability. That thin margin tells you everything.

    Both teams are treading water. St. Louis is -12 on goal differential over their last 10 games; New York is -6. The loss of positive possession means limited scoring opportunities, which in a close game compounds quickly.

    The underlying analytics offer little separation. New York holds 48.0% expected goals share at 5-on-5 with 49.0% Corsi, while St. Louis mirrors that at 49.0% xG% and 48.0% Corsi. The Blues' 1.000 PDO is exactly league average; the Rangers' 1.009 suggests minor luck in their favor, not a structural edge.

    Watch J. Quick. If the Blues use their backup, fatigue won't be a factor. If Quick takes the start, the back-to-back workload becomes a leverage point down the stretch.

    New York's offensive load rests on Adam Sykora and Gabe Perreault. Sykora has generated 0.91 expected goals per 60 with 3 goals and 1 assist on a blistering 20.0% shooting rate, yet none of his goals have come from high-danger situations. Perreault is more balanced at 0.79 xG/60 with 8 goals, 11 assists, and 2 high-danger goals, though his 13.1% shooting clip also runs hot. St. Louis counters with Jimmy Snuggerud (0.86 xG/60, 15 goals, 22 assists, 2 HD goals at 11.9% shooting) and Dylan Holloway (0.82 xG/60, 13 goals, 24 assists, 1 HD goal at 10.8% shooting). Snuggerud's shot conversion edges the Rangers' pair, a minor tell in a tight matchup.

    Both teams have an identical scoring architecture problem. New York generated 0% of its goals from high-danger situations and 0% from rebounds; St. Louis mirrors that exactly. Both are scoring on perimeter looks, which limits margin for error in close contests.

    Defensively, Vincent Iorio is New York's weak link, while Snuggerud represents St. Louis's liability. The model got it right: this is a coin flip with a slight lean toward the Blues.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    STL 53%
    53%
    STL
    Model favorite
    47%
    53%
    NYR50STL

    STL by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.3–2.5 STL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYR← edge
    edge →STL
    48.0%49.0%
    49.0%48.0%
    2.262.34
    2.402.40
    1.882.00
    1.902.12
    1.0091.000

    The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (1.009 vs 1.000) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    NYR
    4-4-2
    -6 GD · 1d rest
    STL
    5-5-0
    -12 GD · 2d rest
    1.009
    NYR PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.000
    STL PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Things to watch
    • J. Quick is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • The Blues are underwater at -12 goal differential over their last 10.
    • The Rangers are underwater at -6 goal differential over their last 10.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    NYR
    Expected in goal
    J. Quick
    back-to-back.875 last start
    Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    STL
    Expected in goal
    J. Hofer
    2 days rest.840 last start
    Backup Joel Hofer · +11.7 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYR
    Adam Sykora3G 1A
    0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
    Gabe Perreault8G 11A
    0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
    STL
    Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
    0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
    Dylan Holloway13G 24A
    0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next