Sabres hold off the Flyers
The Sabres earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Buffalo's 5–3 win masked a narrow territorial edge. The Sabres held just 51% of shot attempts (28–27), yet controlled the game where it mattered—at the net. They generated 4.32 expected goals to Philadelphia's 3.22, a 57–43 split, and high-danger chances favored them 7–3.
The difference was shot quality. Buffalo's offense created 0.080 expected goals per shot; Philadelphia generated 0.056. That efficiency advantage held up in the rush, where Buffalo scored five times on 29 chances while Philadelphia converted three of 25.
Neither team capitalized on rebounds. Buffalo created three rebound opportunities, Philadelphia six—both proved empty despite effective net-front tactics. A. Lyon saved 24 of 27 for Buffalo (0.889 SV%). S. Ersson made 23 stops for Philadelphia (0.852 SV%).
The danger ladder
BUF went 2-for-14 from medium danger on 1.39 expected goals — 0.6 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
PHI finished -0.2 against expected, BUF +0.7 — S. Ersson (PHI) saved 0.3 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 2-for-21, BUF 4-for-31. BUF scored 5 of theirs off the rush.
- BUF generated far more dangerous chances — 0.080 xG/shot vs 0.056. Quality over quantity.
- BUF was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 29 rush chances.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 25 rush chances.
- BUF created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- PHI created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.