Motion-blurred skater in a Detroit Red Wings sweater
Breakdown · WSH at DET

Red Wings steal one from the Capitals against the run of play

The verdict · stolen

The Red Wings stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.18–2.82 and won anyway.

WSH 2 · DET 3
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 9:22 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Detroit won 3-2 in overtime despite posting only 2.82 expected goals to Washington's 4.18. The Capitals controlled 60% of the xG at 5v5, dominated shot attempts (33 to 27), and still lost. This was a heist.

The Red Wings survived on precision. They converted 3-of-5 high-danger chances. The Capitals managed 0-of-5. That gap—a 60-percentage-point swing on the quality look—swallowed their entire possession advantage. C. Talbot, the Detroit goaltender, made 31 of 33 saves and posted a +2.18 goals-above-expected mark that buried Washington's play entirely. C. Lindgren allowed 27 shots on 24 stops (0.889 SV%), the margin that kills in overtime.

Moritz Seider's slap shot from the high slot at 04:36 of overtime delivered the kill. Washington's pressure had been relentless; Detroit's execution was sharper when it mattered.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Dec 21
WSH
2
DET
3

Red Wings steal one from the Capitals against the run of play

Chances 4.2 – 2.8Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
4.18
DET
2.82
60% of the chances40%

The board read WSH 2, DET 3. The chances read WSH 4.2, DET 2.8.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
DET
+0.2
goals above expected
DET2.82 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
WSH4.18 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Capitals left 2.2 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 14:17WSHE. Frank1–0
  2. P2 08:37DETL. RaymondPP1–1
  3. P2 13:44DETJ. Leonard1–2
  4. P3 10:22WSHE. Frank2–2
  5. OT 04:36DETM. Seider2–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
56 shots
2
Final
97 shots
DET
41 shots
3
WSH attackDET attack
WSH DET Goal
56
shots · 2 in
41
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHDET
0 / 5
1.11 xG
High danger
0 / 3
0.76 xG
2 / 21
2.38 xG
Medium
2 / 15
1.48 xG
0 / 49
0.68 xG
Low
1 / 37
0.58 xG

The Capitals went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
C. Talbot
+2.2
DET · 31/33
C
C. Lindgren
−0.2
WSH · 24/27
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Red Wings steal one from the Capitals against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 14–5
  1. 14:17WSHE. Frank(D. Strome)1–0
2ndshots 8–12
  1. 08:37DETL. Raymondpower play(A. Sandin-Pellikka, E. Finnie)1–1
  2. 13:44DETJ. Leonard(A. DeBrincat, A. Copp)1–2
3rdshots 10–4
  1. 10:22WSHE. Frank(J. Carlson, D. Strome)2–2
OTshots 1–6
  1. 04:36DETM. Seider(A. Copp, E. Finnie)2–3

score reads WSH–DET

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
2.82
DET chances
Goals their shots were worth
+0.2
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.028
DET puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
42.3%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

4.18Expected goals2.82
WSH 60% of the chance quality
33Shots on goal27
5High-danger chances3
75All attempts (Corsi)55
Adjusted for score: WSH 57% · DET 43%
Faceoffs · DET won56%off44%neu52%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH0 / 5 · 1.11 xG
DET0 / 3 · 0.76 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH2 / 21 · 2.38 xG
DET2 / 15 · 1.48 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 49 · 0.68 xG
DET1 / 37 · 0.58 xG

WSH went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.11 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
2 G · 4.18 xG · -2.2
DET
3 G · 2.82 xG · +0.2
012345

WSH finished -2.2 against expected, DET +0.2.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST1/18
SNAP0/14
SLAP0/8
TIP IN0/9
BACKHAND1/6
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/19
DET
WRIST0/17
SNAP1/15
SLAP1/4
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED1/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/14
WSH
DET
Off the rush
2 G on 40
3.08 xG
3 G on 33
2.61 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3
0.40 xG
0 G on 1
0.04 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 1-for-18, DET 0-for-17. DET scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
C. Lindgren
WSH · 24/27 · .889
-0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/30.8+0.8
Medium2/151.5-0.5
Low1/370.6-0.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

C. Talbot
DET · 31/33 · .939
+2.2
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/51.1+1.1
Medium2/212.4+0.4
Low0/490.7+0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

97 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
56 shots
2
Final
97 shots
DET
41 shots
3
WSH attackDET attack
WSH DET Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, DET right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Strome
#17 · C · WSH
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 20:36 on ice · +1
E. Finnie
#58 · C · DET
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 19:14 on ice · +1
E. Frank
#53 · R · WSH
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 15:44 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sun, Dec 21
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 9:20 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model sees this as pick'em: 2.6 goals for each team, Detroit at 51% win probability. That razor-thin edge tells you everything — neither team has earned the quality delta needed to separate itself.

Washington's underlying shot metrics sit marginally ahead. The Capitals own 50.0% expected goals and 49.0% Corsi at 5v5, versus Detroit's 49.0% and 49.0%. That's control, but control without separation. Neither team is crushing the other.

Where Washington faces heavier risk: a PDO of 1.018 means the Capitals are running hot on luck — shooting and save percentages both trending above neutral. Regression typically follows. Detroit's 0.985 sits the opposite direction, suggesting bounces have gone against them. If puck luck breaks this game (and pick'em games often do), the underlying trajectory favors Detroit.

Both starting goaltenders face back-to-back scheduling. J. Gibson for Washington and L. Thompson for Detroit each worked recently; fatigue is a factor, and backup appearances wouldn't shock.

The Capitals' offense centers on Alex Ovechkin, generating 0.97 expected goals per 60 at 19G 17A with 2 high-danger goals. His 13.8% shooting rate tells you he's converting above what his chances suggest. Anthony Beauvillier (0.89 xG/60, 14G 9A, 2 HD goals) is Washington's secondary threat, though his 10.4% shooting also hints at overperformance.

Detroit counters with Alex DeBrincat, whose 0.88 xG/60 and 17G 28A put him among the league's elite playmakers. His 9.0% shooting (2 high-danger goals) suggests controlled, high-quality scoring. Marco Kasper (0.81 xG/60, 7G 8A, 1 HD goal) operates below but fills minutes efficiently at 6.1% shooting.

Washington's defensive weak link is Declan Chisholm; Detroit's is Axel Sandin-Pellikka. Whichever team generates sustained pressure through the weaker defensive link likely dictates the final frame.

A genuine coin flip demands no conviction, only acknowledgment of legitimate uncertainty.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

DET 51%
51%
DET
Model favorite
49%
51%
WSH50DET

DET by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.6–2.6 DET; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →DET
50.0%49.0%
49.0%49.0%
2.622.38
2.622.50
2.181.73
1.792.07
1.0180.985

WSH holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 0.985) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
WSH
5-3-2
+3 GD · 1d rest
DET
7-2-1
+8 GD · 1d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.985
DET PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • J. Gibson is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • L. Thompson is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
WSH
Expected in goal
L. Thompson
back-to-back.900 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

DET
Expected in goal
J. Gibson
back-to-back.923 last start
Backup John Gibson · +11.7 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
Keep going

Where to next