Backcheck
Recap · NYR at NSH

Predators run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Predators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:25 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
1
Home
NSH
Nashville Predators
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

1.99Expected goals3.27
62% share for the better side
17Shot attempts (SOG)32
4High-danger chances5
50Corsi (all attempts)64
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Predators edged the Rangers 2–1 in a game where a surface reading of high-danger chances—5–4 Nashville—suggested a tighter affair than the final score delivers. But dig deeper into the underlying numbers, and Nashville's dominance emerges unambiguous: 62% of expected goals (3.27–1.99) and 65% of shot attempts (32–17 on goal). The Predators controlled this game at the structural level.

The third period materialized the advantage. F. Forsberg and R. O'Reilly scored in quick succession, with Brodzinski's snap shot from the doorstep (P3, 19:23) serving as the backbreaker. Both teams finished short of their expected totals—Nashville underperformed by 1.27 goals, New York by 0.99—though the variance mattered less than the underlying volume Nashville created.

J. Quick's evening presented the night's starkest contradiction. The Rangers goaltender stopped 2.3 goals above expected (0.968 SV%), a performance that ranks among his finest. Yet elite goaltending proved insufficient against a team that controlled the shot count and expected-goal share so thoroughly. Quick kept New York competitive despite being outgunned at the structural level; Nashville's superiority was simply too wide to overcome.

When dominant teams convert their underlying advantages, the scoreboard follows. That's what happened here.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR1 / 4 · 1.05 xG
NSH1 / 5 · 1.65 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR0 / 5 · 0.46 xG
NSH0 / 9 · 0.90 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR0 / 41 · 0.48 xG
NSH1 / 50 · 0.72 xG

NSH went 0-for-9 from medium danger on 0.90 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
1 G · 1.99 xG · -1.0
NSH
2 G · 3.27 xG · -1.3
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. QuickNYR
+2.3
J. AnnunenNSH
+1.0

NYR finished -1.0 against expected, NSH -1.3 — J. Quick (NYR) saved 2.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST0/11
SNAP1/12
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/0
OTHER0/20
NSH
WRIST2/24
SNAP0/10
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/3
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/21
NYR
NSH
Off the rush
0 G on 18 · 1.46 xG
1 G on 28 · 1.81 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.43 xG
0 G on 6 · 0.70 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 0-for-11, NSH 2-for-24.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. O'Reilly
#90 · C · NSH
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 21:24 TOI · +2
F. Forsberg
#9 · L · NSH
1 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 16:57 TOI · +1
S. Stamkos
#91 · C · NSH
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 16:49 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Quick (NYR) stopped 2.3 goals above expected.
  • NSH created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • J. Quick (NYR) saved 2.3 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at NSH · 7:00 PM ET

Rangers at Predators: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 9:24 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
NSH
Model favorite
48%
52%
NYR50NSH

NSH by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NYR 2.42.6 NSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →NSH
48.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
49.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.26xGF / 602.48
2.40xGA / 602.58
1.88Goals for / gm1.84
1.90Goals against / gm2.21
1.009PDO — luck, not skill0.992

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.009 vs 0.992) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a Rangers 2.4–2.6 goals per game outcome with the Predators at 52% win probability—a genuine pick'em.

New York sits -5 in goal differential over its last 10, a concerning sign for a team that trails at 5v5. Nashville holds 49.0% expected goals and 50.0% Corsi, marginal but consistent edges. The Predators' 0.992 PDO suggests underperformance; the Rangers' 1.009 implies borrowed wins. Nashville enters on 3 days of rest to New York's 1 day.

I. Shesterkin works back-to-back—watch for a tired starter or a backup appearance. Either way, Nashville's rest advantage looms.

Adam Sykora (0.91 xG/60, 3G 1A, 20.0% shooting) has been New York's sharpest forward, generating at an elite rate and finishing at the same level. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8G 11A, 2 hard-chance goals, 13.1% shooting) is the consistent producer, though his goal tally trails his chance creation. Nashville's Zachary L'Heureux (0.85 xG/60, 4G, 1 hard-chance goal, 16.0% shooting) is a danger whose goal count masks his offensive pressure, while Filip Forsberg (0.80 xG/60, 23G 17A, 4 hard-chance goals, 13.6% shooting) is a volume scorer on a run.

Defensively, Jonathan Marchessault is Nashville's liability; Vincent Iorio is New York's weak link. Neither team has scored from hard-danger or rebound situations, making 5v5 play the entire story. At those odds, the outcome is genuinely uncertain.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters