Flyers run the Canucks off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
T. Demko stopped 2.2 goals above expected, yet still lost 5–2. The gap in underlying numbers proved too wide for any goaltending to overcome.
The Flyers dominated at 5v5: 67% of expected goals (6.17–3.10), 61% of shot attempts, and far superior shot quality. Their chances averaged 0.091 expected goals per shot to Vancouver's 0.060. Philadelphia converted 3 of 34 rush attempts into goals; Vancouver converted 2 of 23.
High-danger chances ran 15–8 in Philadelphia's favor. Both teams underperformed their expected goals—the Flyers by 1.17, Vancouver by 1.10—but that math barely narrowed the gap. Philadelphia's goalie D. Vladar exceeded expectations by 1.10, but Demko's 2.17 above expected proved insufficient against such lopsided metrics.
The danger ladder
VAN went 0-for-7 from medium danger on 0.76 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
VAN finished -1.1 against expected, PHI -1.2 — T. Demko (VAN) saved 2.2 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: VAN went 1-for-8, PHI 2-for-26. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- T. Demko (VAN) stopped 2.2 goals above expected.
- Open game — 23 high-danger chances combined (PHI 15, VAN 8).
- PHI generated far more dangerous chances — 0.091 xG/shot vs 0.060. Quality over quantity.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 34 rush chances.
- VAN was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
- PHI created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- VAN created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- T. Demko (VAN) saved 2.2 goals above expected — stole the show.