Motion-blurred skater in a Vegas Golden Knights sweater
Breakdown · SJS at VGK

Golden Knights run the Sharks off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Golden Knights earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

SJS 2 · VGK 7
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 9:50 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Vegas didn't just beat San Jose—they overperformed their underlying numbers by 2.79 goals, turning a deserved 4.21 expected goals into a 7-2 blowout. That gap tells you everything about a lopsided game where one team's precision exceeded even its excellent play.

The Knights controlled the quality battle thoroughly. They held 63% of 5v5 expected goals (4.21–2.43), crushed San Jose on shot attempts (53%, 26–23), and won the high-danger chance battle 7–4. But execution was the real separator.

Vegas was clinical in the dangerous area: 43% on high-danger chances (3 of 7 converted), a lethal mark that punishes teams for defensive breakdowns. They were unstoppable on the rush—six goals on 28 chances—a rate that speaks to structure and speed that San Jose couldn't contain.

San Jose's underlying game wasn't awful, though. They generated higher-quality looks than their shot total suggested (0.055 xG per shot vs Vegas's 0.088), meaning they created dangerous moments despite being outplayed overall. But their goaltending couldn't salvage it. Y. Askarov gave up 1.41 more goals than expected; A. Nedeljkovic was 1.38 over. Both sank while their defense crumbled around them.

Vegas's C. Hart (21 saves, 0.913 SV%) barely needed to steal anything. The Knights crashed the net effectively, generating five rebound opportunities and converting one. San Jose created four rebounds and also converted one, but on a smaller possession sample.

The turning point came early: Collin Graf's wrist shot from the doorstep at 8:04 of the third. That goal felt emblematic—Vegas capitalizing on its advantages with ruthless efficiency while San Jose foundered trying to claw back.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Dec 23
SJS
2
VGK
7

Golden Knights run the Sharks off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 2.4 – 4.2Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Golden Knights earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
SJS
2.43
VGK
4.21
37% of the chances63%

The board read SJS 2, VGK 7. The chances read SJS 2.4, VGK 4.2.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
VGK
+2.8
goals above expected
VGK4.21 expected · 7 scored
Expected
Scored
SJS2.43 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Golden Knights scored 2.8 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:46VGKB. Howden0–1
  2. P1 09:07VGKM. MarnerPP0–2
  3. P1 11:37VGKC. Sissons0–3
  4. P1 14:57VGKT. Hertl0–4
  5. P1 18:34VGKM. Stone0–5
  6. P2 06:49SJSM. Celebrini1–5
  7. P2 18:50VGKR. Smith1–6
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
SJS
35 shots
2
Final
77 shots
VGK
42 shots
7
SJS attackVGK attack
SJS VGK Goal
35
shots · 2 in
42
shots · 7 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
SJSVGK
1 / 4
1.01 xG
High danger
3 / 7
1.44 xG
1 / 10
0.91 xG
Medium
4 / 20
2.39 xG
0 / 30
0.51 xG
Low
0 / 21
0.38 xG

The Golden Knights buried 3 of 7 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
A. Nedeljkovic
+1.2
SJS · 7/10
B
C. Hart
+0.4
VGK · 21/23
+1 more on the full breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Golden Knights run the Sharks off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 5–17
  1. 01:46VGKB. Howden(B. Bowman, R. Smith)0–1
  2. 09:07VGKM. Marnerpower play(N. Hanifin, P. Dorofeyev)0–2
  3. 11:37VGKC. Sissons(K. Kolesar, B. Saad)0–3
  4. 14:57VGKT. Hertl(P. Dorofeyev)0–4
  5. 18:34VGKM. Stone(I. Barbashev, K. Korczak)0–5
2ndshots 4–5
  1. 06:49SJSM. Celebrini(T. Toffoli)1–5
  2. 18:50VGKR. Smith(K. Korczak, B. Bowman)1–6
3rdshots 14–4
  1. 05:22VGKM. Marner(M. Stone, I. Barbashev)1–7
  2. 08:04SJSC. Graf(T. Toffoli, A. Wennberg)2–7

score reads SJS–VGK

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
4.21
VGK chances
Goals their shots were worth
+2.8
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.100
VGK puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
52.2%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.43Expected goals4.21
VGK 63% of the chance quality
23Shots on goal26
4High-danger chances7
44All attempts (Corsi)48
Adjusted for score: SJS 55% · VGK 45%
Faceoffs · VGK won53%off45%neu46%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
SJS1 / 4 · 1.01 xG
VGK3 / 7 · 1.44 xG
Medium dangermid-range
SJS1 / 10 · 0.91 xG
VGK4 / 20 · 2.39 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
SJS0 / 30 · 0.51 xG
VGK0 / 21 · 0.38 xG

VGK went 4-for-20 from medium danger on 2.39 expected goals — 1.6 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
SJS
2 G · 2.43 xG · -0.4
VGK
7 G · 4.21 xG · +2.8
012345678

SJS finished -0.4 against expected, VGK +2.8.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
SJS
WRIST1/19
SNAP1/7
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/2
TIP IN0/2
BAT0/1
OTHER0/9
VGK
WRIST3/20
SNAP2/7
SLAP1/5
BACKHAND1/6
TIP IN0/4
BAT0/0
OTHER0/6
SJS
VGK
Off the rush
1 G on 18
1.61 xG
6 G on 28
3.07 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4
0.54 xG
1 G on 5
0.89 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: SJS went 1-for-19, VGK 3-for-20. VGK scored 6 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
Y. Askarov
SJS · 12/16 · .750
+0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger3/71.4-1.6
Medium4/202.4-1.6
Low0/210.4+0.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

A. Nedeljkovic
SJS · 7/10 · .700
+1.2
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger3/71.4-1.6
Medium4/202.4-1.6
Low0/210.4+0.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

C. Hart
VGK · 21/23 · .913
+0.4
saved above expected
B
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.0+0.0
Medium1/100.9-0.1
Low0/300.5+0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

77 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
SJS
35 shots
2
Final
77 shots
VGK
42 shots
7
SJS attackVGK attack
SJS VGK Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — SJS left, VGK right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
K. Korczak
#6 · D · VGK
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 20:19 on ice · +1
P. Dorofeyev
#16 · R · VGK
0 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 17:26 on ice
M. Marner
#93 · R · VGK
2 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 16:53 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Tue, Dec 23
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 9:49 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.2–2.7 Vegas win at 58% probability. The underlying play backs the pick. Vegas dominates at 5v5: 54.0% expected goals versus San Jose's 48.0%, 52.0% Corsi versus 47.0%. That gap in volume and quality compounds.

The sharper edge is regression. Vegas's PDO of 0.983 shows a team running cold, due for positive variance. San Jose sits at 0.998.

Recent form favors Vegas. San Jose is -5 in goal differential over their last ten, evidence that underlying metrics haven't translated into results. The Sharks arrive tactically disadvantaged and out of form.

One wrinkle: C. Hart skates on a back-to-back. Monitor the goaltending call.

Players to Watch

San Jose

  • Pavol Regenda — 1.10 xG/60, 5G 1A, 2 HD goals, 16.1% shooting
  • Igor Chernyshov — 0.91 xG/60, 6G 8A, 1 HD goals, 15.0% shooting

Vegas

  • Brandon Saad — 0.91 xG/60, 3G 6A, 1 HD goals, 4.1% shooting
  • Tomas Hertl — 0.88 xG/60, 5G 17A, 1 HD goals, 4.3% shooting
What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

VGK 58%
58%
VGK
Model favorite
42%
58%
SJS50VGK

VGK by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score SJS 2.2–2.7 VGK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
SJS← edge
edge →VGK
48.0%54.0%
47.0%52.0%
2.332.52
2.562.11
1.992.12
2.322.10
0.9980.983

VGK holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.998 vs 0.983) says SJS has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
SJS
5-5-0
-5 GD · 2d rest
VGK
6-2-2
+2 GD · 1d rest
0.998
SJS PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.983
VGK PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • The Golden Knights drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • C. Hart is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Sharks are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
SJS
Expected in goal
Y. Askarov
2 days rest.903 last start
Backup Yaroslav Askarov · -18.9 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

VGK
Expected in goal
C. Hart
back-to-back.810 last start
Backup Akira Schmid · -1.0 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
VGK
Brandon Saad3G 6A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
Tomas Hertl5G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
Keep going

Where to next