Motion-blurred skater in a Seattle Kraken sweater
Breakdown · SEA at LAK

Kraken steal one from the Kings against the run of play

The verdict · stolen

The Kraken stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.99–4.61 and won anyway.

SEA 3 · LAK 2
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 9:53 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Kings controlled 61% of expected goals and still lost 3-2. That is theft, and J. Daccord was the thief.

Seattle's goaltender stopped 2.61 goals above expected, posting a 0.946 save percentage on 35 shots. He was perfect on high-danger chances, stopping all eight. Meanwhile, Los Angeles managed zero goals on eight high-danger attempts — they had the looks, and Daccord denied them.

The Kings dominated by every volume measure. They took 37 shot attempts to Seattle's 28. They generated 4.61 expected goals to the Kraken's 2.99. They won the high-danger-chance battle 8-4. And they still lost, because variance cut them both ways: their own goaltending faltered (0.893 SV%), while Seattle's was transcendent.

The Kraken were clinical where it mattered. Seattle finished 3-for-24 on rush chances; Los Angeles was 2-for-30. E. Tolvanen recorded two assists in 19:33. D. Doughty had one in 24:27, and B. Clarke one in 21:14, but secondary scoring couldn't overcome Daccord's wall.

Andrei Kuzmenko's wraparound from the doorstep in the third period (08:45) was the game's pivot. It gave Seattle a lead they would not relinquish despite Los Angeles' sustained pressure. The Kings crashed the net for three rebound opportunities and converted zero — they came close to stealing back this theft, but late chances went begging.

P. Copley stopped 25 of 28 for Los Angeles. The math was simple: xG and volume meant nothing against elite goaltending and Seattle's ruthless finish on the rush.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Dec 23
SEA
3
LAK
2

Kraken steal one from the Kings against the run of play

Chances 3.0 – 4.6Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Kings deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
SEA
2.99
LAK
4.61
39% of the chances61%

The board read SEA 3, LAK 2. The chances read SEA 3.0, LAK 4.6.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
SEA
+0.0
goals above expected
SEA2.99 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
LAK4.61 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Kings left 2.6 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P2 01:10SEAJ. EberlePP1–0
  2. P2 07:26SEAF. Gaudreau2–0
  3. P2 16:02SEAB. Meyers3–0
  4. P2 16:13LAKK. Fiala3–1
  5. P3 08:45LAKA. Kuzmenko3–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
SEA
40 shots
3
Final
96 shots
LAK
56 shots
2
SEA attackLAK attack
SEA LAK Goal
40
shots · 3 in
56
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
SEALAK
1 / 4
0.89 xG
High danger
0 / 8
2.13 xG
1 / 16
1.72 xG
Medium
2 / 17
1.78 xG
1 / 26
0.38 xG
Low
0 / 53
0.71 xG

The Kings went 0 for 8 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Daccord
+2.6
SEA · 35/37
C
P. Copley
−0.0
LAK · 25/28
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Kraken steal one from the Kings against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 9–13no goals
    2ndshots 14–15
    1. 01:10SEAJ. Eberlepower play(M. Beniers, C. Stephenson)1–0
    2. 07:26SEAF. Gaudreau(E. Tolvanen, J. Mahura)2–0
    3. 16:02SEAB. Meyers(J. Oleksiak, E. Tolvanen)3–0
    4. 16:13LAKK. Fiala3–1
    3rdshots 5–9
    1. 08:45LAKA. Kuzmenko(B. Clarke, D. Doughty)3–2

    score reads SEA–LAK

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    2.99
    SEA chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +0.0
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    1.040
    SEA puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    37.1%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    2.99Expected goals4.61
    LAK 61% of the chance quality
    28Shots on goal37
    4High-danger chances8
    46All attempts (Corsi)78
    Adjusted for score: SEA 34% · LAK 66%
    Faceoffs · LAK won71%off53%neu37%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    SEA1 / 4 · 0.89 xG
    LAK0 / 8 · 2.13 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    SEA1 / 16 · 1.72 xG
    LAK2 / 17 · 1.78 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    SEA1 / 26 · 0.38 xG
    LAK0 / 53 · 0.71 xG

    LAK went 0-for-8 from high danger on 2.13 expected goals — 2.1 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    SEA
    3 G · 2.99 xG · +0.0
    LAK
    2 G · 4.61 xG · -2.6
    012345

    SEA finished +0.0 against expected, LAK -2.6.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    SEA
    WRIST3/20
    SNAP0/8
    SLAP0/5
    BACKHAND0/3
    WRAP AROUND0/3
    TIP IN0/1
    OTHER0/6
    LAK
    WRIST0/32
    SNAP0/11
    SLAP0/9
    BACKHAND1/1
    WRAP AROUND1/1
    TIP IN0/2
    OTHER0/22
    SEA
    LAK
    Off the rush
    3 G on 24
    2.16 xG
    2 G on 30
    3.16 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 2
    0.13 xG
    0 G on 3
    0.75 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: SEA went 3-for-20, LAK 0-for-32. SEA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    J. Daccord
    SEA · 35/37 · .946
    +2.6
    saved above expected
    A+
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/82.1+2.1
    Medium2/171.8-0.2
    Low0/530.7+0.7

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    P. Copley
    LAK · 25/28 · .893
    -0.0
    saved above expected
    C
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/40.9-0.1
    Medium1/161.7+0.7
    Low1/260.4-0.6

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    96 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    SEA
    40 shots
    3
    Final
    96 shots
    LAK
    56 shots
    2
    SEA attackLAK attack
    SEA LAK Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — SEA left, LAK right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    E. Tolvanen
    #20 · R · SEA
    0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 19:33 on ice · +1
    D. Doughty
    #8 · D · LAK
    0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 24:27 on ice · +1
    B. Clarke
    #92 · D · LAK
    0 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 21:14 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Tue, Dec 23
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 9:50 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.2–2.6 goal range with the Kings at 57% win probability. The decisive edge: Los Angeles enters with four days' rest while Seattle took only two.

    Kings dominate underlying play. At 5v5, they lead 52.0% in expected goals and Corsi, compared to Seattle's 46.0% and 45.0% respectively. Territorial control translates to frequency—the Kings defend less and attack more.

    Momentum compounds the gap. Los Angeles posted 4-4-2 in their last ten; Seattle sank to -18 goal differential over the same span, a stark deterioration that suggests both play quality and results shifted. PDO numbers (1.002 for Los Angeles, 1.011 for Seattle) confirm these margins reflect actual performance, not variance.

    Player-level edges are subtler. Alex Laferriere leads Los Angeles with 0.87 expected goals per 60 minutes, 16 goals, and 18 assists, though his 2 high-danger goals show restraint over volume. Shane Wright anchors Seattle's offense at 0.77 xG/60; his 4 high-danger goals against a 10.4% shooting percentage suggest he generates dangerous looks consistently. Berkly Catton supports Wright at 0.68 xG/60 with 6 goals and 8 assists, though he's been remarkably efficient with 5 high-danger goals. Jared Wright (0.83 xG/60, 0 goals, 4 assists) generates chances for Los Angeles without converting them himself.

    The model's confidence in a seven-percentage-point edge rests on possession dominance and recovery time, not on a player-specific mismatch that might tilt outcomes. That gap proves harder to overcome than any single scorer.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    LAK 57%
    57%
    LAK
    Model favorite
    43%
    57%
    SEA50LAK

    LAK by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score SEA 2.2–2.6 LAK; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    SEA← edge
    edge →LAK
    46.0%52.0%
    45.0%52.0%
    2.132.42
    2.512.20
    1.871.85
    1.951.71
    1.0111.002

    LAK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.011 vs 1.002) says SEA has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    SEA
    2-8-0
    -18 GD · 2d rest
    LAK
    4-4-2
    +1 GD · 4d rest
    1.011
    SEA PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.002
    LAK PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Kings own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 46.0%.
    • The Kings drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    Things to watch
    • The Kings own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 46.0%.
    • The Kings drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
    • The Kings are the hotter team by points pace (4-4-2 in their last 10).
    • The Kraken are underwater at -18 goal differential over their last 10.
    • The Kings have 2 more days of rest.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    SEA
    Expected in goal
    J. Daccord
    2 days rest.972 last start
    Backup Joey Daccord · -6.2 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    LAK
    Expected in goal
    A. Forsberg
    4 days rest.969 last start
    Backup Darcy Kuemper · -5.8 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    SEA
    Shane Wright8G 10A
    0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
    Berkly Catton6G 8A
    0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
    LAK
    Alex Laferriere16G 18A
    0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
    Jared Wright0G 4A
    0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next