Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · WSH at NJD

Capitals run the Devils off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 4 · NJD 3
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 9:57 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Washington won 4-3 in overtime, but the dominance started earlier: the Capitals controlled 60% of 5v5 expected goals (4.91–3.22), turning shot volume into shot quality.

New Jersey had the puck more, notching 54% of shot attempts (38–33 on goal). The underlying metrics revealed why volume mattered less than it appeared. Washington created high-danger chances at a 13-to-4 clip and converted 0.088 expected goals per shot to New Jersey's 0.044—a twofold gap. New Jersey managed to stay lethal off the rush, converting 2 goals on 28 chances, while Washington answered with 3 on 30, showing both teams thrived in transition.

L. Thompson stopped 35 of 38 shots for Washington (0.921 SV%), while J. Allen made 29 saves on 33 shots for New Jersey (0.879 SV%). Allen outperformed his expected performance by 0.91 goals—an unusually strong night for a losing effort—while Washington underperformed its xG by the same margin, suggesting the Capitals' scoreline could have been higher.

Jakob Chychrun's overtime winner came at 04:06, a timely finish to a night where Washington's quality-over-quantity approach finally broke through.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Dec 27
WSH
4
NJD
3

Capitals run the Devils off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 4.9 – 3.2Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
4.91
NJD
3.22
60% of the chances40%

The board read WSH 4, NJD 3. The chances read WSH 4.9, NJD 3.2.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
−0.9
goals above expected
WSH4.91 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
NJD3.22 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 19:59WSHA. Protas1–0
  2. P2 04:56NJDJ. BrattPP1–1
  3. P2 17:33WSHA. Beauvillier2–1
  4. P3 07:00NJDJ. Bratt2–2
  5. P3 07:32NJDC. Glass2–3
  6. P3 09:17WSHA. Ovechkin3–3
  7. OT 04:06WSHJ. Chychrun4–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
46 shots
4
Final
95 shots
NJD
49 shots
3
WSH attackNJD attack
WSH NJD Goal
46
shots · 4 in
49
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHNJD
4 / 13
2.86 xG
High danger
1 / 4
0.97 xG
0 / 14
1.52 xG
Medium
1 / 14
1.54 xG
0 / 29
0.54 xG
Low
1 / 55
0.72 xG

The Capitals buried 4 of 13 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
J. Allen
+0.9
NJD · 29/33
C
L. Thompson
+0.2
WSH · 35/38
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals run the Devils off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 11–15
  1. 19:59WSHA. Protas(A. Ovechkin)1–0
2ndshots 7–14
  1. 04:56NJDJ. Brattpower play(N. Hischier, S. Noesen)1–1
  2. 17:33WSHA. Beauvillier(A. Protas)2–1
3rdshots 13–8
  1. 07:00NJDJ. Bratt2–2
  2. 07:32NJDC. Glass(C. Brown, B. Dillon)2–3
  3. 09:17WSHA. Ovechkin(R. Sandin, A. Protas)3–3
OTshots 2–1
  1. 04:06WSHJ. Chychrun(N. Dowd, D. Strome)4–3

score reads WSH–NJD

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
4.91
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
−0.9
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.030
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
43.4%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

4.91Expected goals3.22
WSH 60% of the chance quality
33Shots on goal38
13High-danger chances4
56All attempts (Corsi)73
Adjusted for score: WSH 43% · NJD 57%
Faceoffs · NJD won44%off40%neu17%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH4 / 13 · 2.86 xG
NJD1 / 4 · 0.97 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH0 / 14 · 1.52 xG
NJD1 / 14 · 1.54 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 29 · 0.54 xG
NJD1 / 55 · 0.72 xG

WSH went 0-for-14 from medium danger on 1.52 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
4 G · 4.91 xG · -0.9
NJD
3 G · 3.22 xG · -0.2
0123456

WSH finished -0.9 against expected, NJD -0.2.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST1/28
SNAP2/9
TIP IN0/2
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT1/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/10
NJD
WRIST1/16
SNAP2/23
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/0
POKE0/1
OTHER0/24
WSH
NJD
Off the rush
3 G on 30
3.31 xG
2 G on 28
2.36 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 9
1.52 xG
0 G on 6
0.60 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 1-for-28, NJD 1-for-16. WSH scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
L. Thompson
WSH · 35/38 · .921
+0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.0-0.0
Medium1/141.5+0.5
Low1/550.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Allen
NJD · 29/33 · .879
+0.9
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger4/132.9-1.1
Medium0/141.5+1.5
Low0/290.5+0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

95 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
46 shots
4
Final
95 shots
NJD
49 shots
3
WSH attackNJD attack
WSH NJD Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, NJD right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Protas
#21 · L · WSH
1 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 19:49 on ice · +3
J. Bratt
#63 · L · NJD
2 G · 0 A · 6 SOG · 17:39 on ice
A. Ovechkin
#8 · L · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 15:20 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sat, Dec 27
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 10:03 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects this as a 2.6 to 2.7 expected-goals game, with the Devils holding a slim 52% win probability—about as pick'em as you'll find in the NHL.

Both teams enter in form slumps. Washington is -7 in goal differential over its last 10 games; New Jersey sits -8. What separates them is shot quality and variance.

At 5v5, both teams have generated exactly 50.0% expected goals. Washington owns a 49.0% Corsi percentage against 51.0% for New Jersey—a marginal possession advantage for the Devils, meaningful only at the margins. The real dividing line is shooting luck: Washington's 1.018 PDO suggests unsustainable heat; New Jersey's 0.971 suggests regression due.

That regression story plays out through individual matchups. Alex Ovechkin drives 0.97 expected goals per 60 minutes and has converted 13.8% of his shots into 19 goals and 17 assists, with only 2 high-danger opportunities. Anthony Beauvillier sits at 0.89 xG/60, having produced 14 goals and 9 assists on 10.4% shooting, also with 2 high-danger goals. Both are outscoring their volume.

New Jersey's offensive edge comes from Timo Meier, who leads at 1.08 xG/60 and has scored 13 goals and 15 assists despite a 6.7% shooting rate—his 3 high-danger goals suggest underlying opportunity. Jack Hughes generates 0.88 xG/60 and has put up 18 goals and 17 assists on 11.5% shooting with just 1 high-danger goal, another sign that luck is propping up his counting stats.

The wrinkle: neither team scores from chaos. Washington and New Jersey each sit at 0% high-danger goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate, meaning both offenses rely on clean looks that their depth can't consistently create. Defensively, Washington's Declan Chisholm and New Jersey's Johnathan Kovacevic represent soft spots that a hot team could exploit.

The Devils' PDO suggests mean reversion upward; Washington's suggests downward. But form has both teams struggling, and the models rate them dead even. Expect tight margins and a game decided by whether Ovechkin and Meier can maintain their outlier efficiency or whether regression arrives tonight.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NJD 52%
52%
NJD
Model favorite
48%
52%
WSH50NJD

NJD by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.6–2.7 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →NJD
50.0%50.0%
49.0%51.0%
2.622.45
2.622.50
2.181.66
1.792.23
1.0180.971

The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (1.018 vs 0.971) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
WSH
3-4-3
-7 GD · 3d rest
NJD
4-6-0
-8 GD · 3d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.971
NJD PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • The Devils are underwater at -8 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Capitals are underwater at -7 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
WSH
Expected in goal
L. Thompson
3 days rest.700 last start
Backup Logan Thompson · +29.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NJD
Expected in goal
J. Markstrom
3 days rest.920 last start
Backup Jacob Markstrom · -11.9 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Keep going

Where to next