D. Wolf stands tall as the Flames edge the Flyers
The Flames earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
D. Wolf stole this game.
The Flames won 5-1, which looks like a demolition, but the underlying numbers suggest Wolf did the demolishing. He faced 26 shots and stopped all of them—a perfect 1.000 SV%—and saved 2.98 goals above expected. For context, that's elite. Calgary's underlying dominance backed the result: they controlled 56% of 5v5 expected goals (3.80–2.98) while holding the Flyers to 49% of shot attempts (26–27).
But the Flames overperformed their own xG by 1.20 goals—they scored 5 on just 3.80 xG. That gap is Wolf. On the flip side, S. Ersson (PHI) underperformed by 1.20 goals against his expected performance.
The Flames were lethal on the rush: three goals on 24 chances. They also banked three goals from low-danger areas—the kind opposing tenders are supposed to steal. Calgary's power play was another weapon: 2 goals on 11 shots (1.27 xG). The Flyers generated six rebound opportunities but converted zero; Calgary crashed effectively for four rebounds and one goal.
Execution was Calgary's edge. Wolf was its punctuation.
Final: PHI 1 – CGY 5
The danger ladder
CGY went 3-for-42 from low danger on 0.45 expected goals — 2.5 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
PHI finished -2.0 against expected, CGY +1.2 — D. Wolf (CGY) saved 3.0 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 0-for-19, CGY 0-for-26. CGY scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- D. Wolf (CGY) stopped 3.0 goals above expected.
- S. Ersson (PHI) gave up 1.2 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- CGY scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- CGY was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 24 rush chances.
- CGY created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- PHI created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- PHI underperformed xG by 2.0 — wasted quality chances.
- D. Wolf (CGY) saved 3.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
- CGY power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 11 PP shots (1.27 xG).