Backcheck
Recap · PHI at CGY

D. Wolf stands tall as the Flames edge the Flyers

The Flames earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 10:39 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
1
Home
CGY
Calgary Flames
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.98Expected goals3.80
56% share for the better side
27Shot attempts (SOG)26
3High-danger chances6
61Corsi (all attempts)66
Score-adjusted: 54% / 46%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

D. Wolf stole this game.

The Flames won 5-1, which looks like a demolition, but the underlying numbers suggest Wolf did the demolishing. He faced 26 shots and stopped all of them—a perfect 1.000 SV%—and saved 2.98 goals above expected. For context, that's elite. Calgary's underlying dominance backed the result: they controlled 56% of 5v5 expected goals (3.80–2.98) while holding the Flyers to 49% of shot attempts (26–27).

But the Flames overperformed their own xG by 1.20 goals—they scored 5 on just 3.80 xG. That gap is Wolf. On the flip side, S. Ersson (PHI) underperformed by 1.20 goals against his expected performance.

The Flames were lethal on the rush: three goals on 24 chances. They also banked three goals from low-danger areas—the kind opposing tenders are supposed to steal. Calgary's power play was another weapon: 2 goals on 11 shots (1.27 xG). The Flyers generated six rebound opportunities but converted zero; Calgary crashed effectively for four rebounds and one goal.

Execution was Calgary's edge. Wolf was its punctuation.


Final: PHI 1 – CGY 5

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI0 / 3 · 0.70 xG
CGY1 / 6 · 1.53 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI0 / 14 · 1.57 xG
CGY1 / 18 · 1.82 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI1 / 44 · 0.70 xG
CGY3 / 42 · 0.45 xG

CGY went 3-for-42 from low danger on 0.45 expected goals — 2.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
1 G · 2.98 xG · -2.0
CGY
5 G · 3.80 xG · +1.2
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. ErssonPHI
-1.2
D. WolfCGY
+3.0

PHI finished -2.0 against expected, CGY +1.2 — D. Wolf (CGY) saved 3.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST0/19
SLAP0/7
SNAP0/5
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER1/20
CGY
WRIST0/26
SLAP3/8
SNAP2/7
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/21
PHI
CGY
Off the rush
0 G on 23 · 1.87 xG
3 G on 24 · 1.93 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 0.62 xG
1 G on 4 · 0.92 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 0-for-19, CGY 0-for-26. CGY scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Weegar
#52 · D · CGY
0 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 23:32 TOI · +2
M. Coronato
#27 · R · CGY
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 16:27 TOI · +1
C. Zary
#47 · C · CGY
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 11:34 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Wolf (CGY) stopped 3.0 goals above expected.
  • S. Ersson (PHI) gave up 1.2 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • CGY scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • CGY was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • CGY created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI underperformed xG by 2.0 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Wolf (CGY) saved 3.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • CGY power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 11 PP shots (1.27 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at CGY · 9:30 PM ET

Flyers at Flames: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 10:37 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
PHI
Model favorite
51%
49%
PHI50CGY

PHI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.52.4 CGY; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →CGY
51.0%5v5 xG%47.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.26xGF / 602.36
2.20xGA / 602.66
1.96Goals for / gm1.76
1.82Goals against / gm2.15
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.985

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.985) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.4 Philadelphia win with the Flyers at 51% win probability—about as close to a pick'em as you'll find. Philadelphia dominates expected goals at 51.0% 5v5 xG versus Calgary's 47.0%, signaling superior shot quality. But that edge inverts in volume: Calgary controls 49.0% Corsi to Philadelphia's 48.0%. Here's the wrinkle: Calgary's 0.985 PDO reveals a team running cold on both finishing and goaltending. Both regress toward average, which could tighten this projection.

Watch the crease. D. Wolf starts this on the second half of a back-to-back—expect either a backup or a starter fighting fatigue. That variable alone could be decisive.

The offensive axis centers on two clear threats per side. Owen Tippett leads Philadelphia with 19 goals on 0.88 xG per 60, buoyed by a 12.1% shooting rate that sits well above average. Christian Dvorak runs 0.81 xG per 60 at an 11.2% conversion, offering a secondary elite scorer. Calgary's Blake Coleman presents the most balanced threat: 16 goals, 0.89 xG per 60, 11.4% shooting. Matt Coronato operates on a wider margin between opportunity and output—10 goals on 0.80 xG per 60, converting at just 6.6%—either pressing or primed for correction. Tippett's combination of volume and elite finishing makes him the preview's premier scorer.

The underlying numbers favor Philadelphia, but Calgary's PDO lag provides an opening. Flip a coin.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
CGY
Blake Coleman16G 12A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.4% sh
Matt Coronato10G 16A
0.80 xG/60 · 0 HD · 6.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters