Motion-blurred skater in a blue sweater
Breakdown · NYR at FLA

I. Shesterkin stands tall as the Rangers edge the Panthers

The verdict · coin flip

The Rangers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

NYR 5 · FLA 1
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 10:50 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

New York won 5-1, but expected goals split 3.98–3.79 in Florida's favor—the Panthers controlled 65% of shot attempts (37–20 on goal). The Rangers won through precision: 0.082 expected goals per shot versus 0.046, paired with goaltending that defied chance quality.

I. Shesterkin was immaculate, stopping 3.0 goals above expected with 36/37 saves at 0.973. He saved all 6 high-danger chances. S. Bobrovsky made 15/19 saves (0.789 SV%) but couldn't stem New York's offensive execution.

The Rangers weaponized transition, scoring 3 goals on 22 rush chances. The power play was dominant—2 goals on 7 shots (0.39 xG)—while Florida's high-danger woes proved fatal. The Panthers' 0-for-6 on high-danger attempts squandered 3.0 goals; that conversion rate won't recur.

Florida underperformed its 3.98 expected goals by 2.98, a collapse in execution mirrored by New York's overperformance of 1.21 goals above their 3.79 expected. Shesterkin's save heroics paired with the Rangers' precision converted a close underlying game into a decisive blowout.

M. Zibanejad led with 3 goals and 2 assists in 22:06. A. Lafrenière added 3 assists in 18:31, while A. Panarin contributed 2 goals and 1 assist in 18:29.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Jan 2
NYR
5
FLA
1

I. Shesterkin stands tall as the Rangers edge the Panthers

Chances 3.8 – 4.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Rangers took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
NYR
3.79
FLA
3.98
49% of the chances51%

The board read NYR 5, FLA 1. The chances read NYR 3.8, FLA 4.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYR
+1.2
goals above expected
NYR3.79 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
FLA3.98 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Panthers left 3.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 15:09NYRM. ZibanejadPP1–0
  2. P1 16:13NYRA. Panarin2–0
  3. P2 00:58NYRM. Zibanejad3–0
  4. P3 02:20FLAS. ReinhartPP3–1
  5. P3 12:25NYRA. PanarinPP4–1
  6. P3 18:32NYRM. ZibanejadEN5–1
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYR
34 shots
5
Final
91 shots
FLA
57 shots
1
NYR attackFLA attack
NYR FLA Goal
34
shots · 5 in
57
shots · 1 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYRFLA
1 / 4
1.78 xG
High danger
0 / 6
1.35 xG
3 / 15
1.60 xG
Medium
1 / 17
1.83 xG
1 / 27
0.41 xG
Low
0 / 64
0.79 xG

The Panthers went 0 for 6 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
I. Shesterkin
+3.0
NYR · 36/37
C
S. Bobrovsky
−0.2
FLA · 15/19
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

I. Shesterkin stands tall as the Rangers edge the Panthers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 6–10
  1. 15:09NYRM. Zibanejadpower play(A. Lafrenière, A. Panarin)1–0
  2. 16:13NYRA. Panarin(M. Zibanejad, A. Lafrenière)2–0
2ndshots 6–15
  1. 00:58NYRM. Zibanejad(A. Lafrenière, V. Trocheck)3–0
3rdshots 8–12
  1. 02:20FLAS. Reinhartpower play(S. Bennett, B. Marchand)3–1
  2. 12:25NYRA. Panarinpower play(V. Trocheck, M. Zibanejad)4–1
  3. 18:32NYRM. Zibanejadempty net5–1

score reads NYR–FLA

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.79
NYR chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.2
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.097
NYR puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
34.6%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.79Expected goals3.98
FLA 51% of the chance quality
20Shots on goal37
4High-danger chances6
46All attempts (Corsi)87
Adjusted for score: NYR 29% · FLA 71%
Faceoffs · FLA won48%off53%neu25%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR1 / 4 · 1.78 xG
FLA0 / 6 · 1.35 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR3 / 15 · 1.60 xG
FLA1 / 17 · 1.83 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR1 / 27 · 0.41 xG
FLA0 / 64 · 0.79 xG

NYR went 3-for-15 from medium danger on 1.60 expected goals — 1.4 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
5 G · 3.79 xG · +1.2
FLA
1 G · 3.98 xG · -3.0
0123456

NYR finished +1.2 against expected, FLA -3.0.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST4/13
SNAP1/10
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/2
OTHER0/12
FLA
WRIST1/36
SNAP0/9
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP0/3
OTHER0/30
NYR
FLA
Off the rush
3 G on 22
2.02 xG
1 G on 37
3.33 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2
0.23 xG
0 G on 2
0.35 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 4-for-13, FLA 1-for-36. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
I. Shesterkin
NYR · 36/37 · .973
+3.0
saved above expected
A+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/61.4+1.4
Medium1/171.8+0.8
Low0/640.8+0.8

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

S. Bobrovsky
FLA · 15/19 · .789
-0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.8+0.8
Medium3/151.6-1.4
Low1/270.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

91 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NYR
34 shots
5
Final
91 shots
FLA
57 shots
1
NYR attackFLA attack
NYR FLA Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, FLA right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Zibanejad
#93 · C · NYR
3 G · 2 A · 6 SOG · 22:06 on ice · +3
A. Lafrenière
#13 · L · NYR
0 G · 3 A · 2 SOG · 18:31 on ice · +2
A. Panarin
#10 · L · NYR
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 18:29 on ice · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Fri, Jan 2
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 10:47 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model has this as even money. Rangers favored by 2.4 to 2.6 goals, but the Panthers carry 53% win probability—pick'em odds in any book. This is what genuine uncertainty looks like in hockey.

Florida is the hotter team. The Panthers sit 6-3-1 over their last 10, while the Rangers have tumbled to -6 goal differential in the same span. Recent form typically forecasts short-term outcomes better than full-season rates, but the underlying numbers complicate things: Rangers xG% stands at 48.0% versus Florida's 49.0%, meaning no real edge in shot quality. Corsi tells a different story entirely. The Panthers' 52.0% possession rate means they'll spend the night in the Rangers' end—territorial dominance that masks a close overall picture.

That possession edge is the game's spine. New York survives on efficiency, and that starts with Adam Sykora, who's shooting 20.0% with 3 goals while generating 0.91 xG per 60 minutes. Unsustainable shooting, but real goal total. With just 1 assist, he's a pure finisher. Gabe Perreault runs at 0.79 xG/60 with 8 goals and 11 assists, cashing 2 high-danger chances at 13.1% shooting. He's the more versatile threat. If the Rangers win, these two build it.

Florida counters with Sam Bennett, who has 18 goals on 0.97 xG/60 and 13.1% shooting—a combination that suggests genuine skill over variance. He's converted 6 high-danger chances and registered 19 assists, which means he manufactures opportunities, not just capitalizes on them. Brad Marchand brings 0.93 xG/60 with 17 goals and 9 assists, though his 19.5% shooting rate promises regression. He's cashed 3 high-danger goals, which is real, but won't sustain the goal pace.

The luck metrics tell you the tension: Rangers at 1.009 PDO (running hot), Panthers at 0.989 (running cold). Florida's possession edge and momentum should prevail, yet New York's efficiency is sharp enough to steal it. This is why the model calls it a coin flip. Both teams can win this.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

FLA 53%
53%
FLA
Model favorite
47%
53%
NYR50FLA

FLA by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.4–2.6 FLA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR← edge
edge →FLA
48.0%49.0%
49.0%52.0%
2.262.48
2.402.56
1.881.98
1.902.21
1.0090.989

FLA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.009 vs 0.989) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NYR
4-5-1
-6 GD · 2d rest
FLA
6-3-1
+3 GD · 2d rest
1.009
NYR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.989
FLA PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Panthers drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Things to watch
  • The Panthers drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • The Panthers are the hotter team by points pace (6-3-1 in their last 10).
  • The Rangers are underwater at -6 goal differential over their last 10.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NYR
Expected in goal
J. Quick
2 days rest.808 last start
Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

FLA
Expected in goal
D. Tarasov
2 days rest.897 last start
Backup Sergei Bobrovsky · -12.2 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
Keep going

Where to next