Flyers run the Oilers off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Philadelphia's 5–2 win stood up to scrutiny. The Flyers controlled 61% of 5v5 expected goals (5.34–3.37), a split that backs the scoreline.
Edmonton held shot volume—46% of attempts (25–29)—but little else. The Oilers managed 0 goals on 7 high-danger chances. The Flyers' D. Vladar was exceptional: 0.920 SV%, 7 of 7 stops on high-danger attempts, +1.37 against expected. Edmonton underperformed their xG by 1.37 goals.
Rush play was closest: Edmonton 2 on 21, Philadelphia 3 on 22. The gap widened in high-danger areas, where Philadelphia generated 9 chances to Edmonton's 7. Both teams crashed the net (Edmonton 5 rebound chances, Philadelphia 3), but neither converted a rebound.
Owen Tippett's wrist shot from the top of the circles (P3, 18:50) marked the turning point.
The danger ladder
PHI went 2-for-9 from high danger on 3.60 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
PHI finished -0.3 against expected, EDM -1.4 — D. Vladar (PHI) saved 1.4 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: PHI went 1-for-9, EDM 1-for-22. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- D. Vladar (PHI) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
- Open game — 16 high-danger chances combined (EDM 7, PHI 9).
- EDM couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- EDM was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 22 rush chances.
- EDM created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- PHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- D. Vladar was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.