Backcheck
Recap · UTA at NYR

Mammoth edge the Rangers in overtime

The Mammoth won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 11:17 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
UTA
Utah Mammoth
3
Home
NYR
New York Rangers
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.14Expected goals3.93
51% share for the better side
27Shot attempts (SOG)24
6High-danger chances8
64Corsi (all attempts)52
Score-adjusted: 56% / 44%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Utah's overtime win looked closer than the scoreboard suggested. Expected goals split 3.93–4.14, with the Rangers holding 47% of shot attempts. Yet New York underperformed their chances by 1.93 goals—a brutal variance swing in a two-goal defeat.

Sean Durzi's wrist shot from the doorstep ended it at 01:06 of overtime. The Rangers, despite the loss, executed precisely where it mattered most: the rush. Both teams scored twice rushing the net. New York did it on 27 attempts, Utah on 33, each finding comparable tempo advantages in transition. Where New York broke: finishing. K. Vejmelka stopped 1.9 goals above expected. I. Shesterkin put up 9-for-9 saves with a 4.1-goal cushion above expected—a towering performance that couldn't overcome his team's offensive drought.

The Rangers' power play nearly salvaged the game. Two playmakers dominated: A. Panarin logged 2 assists in 24:56, while M. Zibanejad matched him with 2 assists in 24:45. New York converted 2 of 13 power-play chances despite generating just 1.70 expected goals—the kind of efficiency variance that decides tight games.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
UTA2 / 6 · 1.49 xG
NYR1 / 8 · 2.00 xG
Medium dangermid-range
UTA1 / 19 · 2.06 xG
NYR1 / 10 · 1.25 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
UTA0 / 39 · 0.60 xG
NYR0 / 34 · 0.68 xG

UTA went 1-for-19 from medium danger on 2.06 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
UTA
3 G · 4.14 xG · -1.1
NYR
2 G · 3.93 xG · -1.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
K. VejmelkaUTA
+1.9
I. ShesterkinNYR
+1.4
J. QuickNYR
-0.2

UTA finished -1.1 against expected, NYR -1.9 — K. Vejmelka (UTA) saved 1.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
UTA
WRIST3/27
SNAP0/10
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/4
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/16
NYR
WRIST1/16
SNAP0/18
TIP IN1/3
BACKHAND0/4
SLAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/9
UTA
NYR
Off the rush
2 G on 33 · 2.99 xG
2 G on 27 · 2.69 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.33 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.55 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: UTA went 3-for-27, NYR 1-for-16. UTA scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Panarin
#10 · L · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 24:56 TOI · -2
M. Zibanejad
#93 · C · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 24:45 TOI · -1
S. Durzi
#50 · D · UTA
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 22:09 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • K. Vejmelka (UTA) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • UTA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 33 rush chances.
  • NYR created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • K. Vejmelka (UTA) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • I. Shesterkin (NYR) saved 4.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • NYR power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 13 PP shots (1.70 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · UTA at NYR · 7:00 PM ET

Mammoth at Rangers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 11:15 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
UTA
Model favorite
51%
49%
UTA50NYR

UTA by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score UTA 2.52.4 NYR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

UTA← edge
edge →NYR
52.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
53.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.64xGF / 602.26
2.39xGA / 602.40
2.26Goals for / gm1.88
1.99Goals against / gm1.90
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.009

UTA holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.009) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects 2.5–2.4, Mammoth at 51% win probability—about as close to a pick'em as you'll find. Mammoth owns the underlying play decisively enough to merit the edge, but not enough to trust it.

Mammoth dominates at 5v5: 52.0% expected goal share against 48.0%, and 53.0% Corsi percentage versus 49.0%. That territorial tilt is real. But both teams run nearly identical PDO (Mammoth 1.003, Rangers 1.009), which means both are converting at reasonable clips—no obvious regression waiting to ambush either side.

The differentiator is shot quality. Dylan Guenther leads Mammoth's charge at 1.02 xG per 60 minutes with 28 goals and 15 assists; he's also tallied 3 high-danger chances and converted at 16.8%. Daniil But sits at 1.01 xG/60 with 2 goals, 2 assists, and 1 high-danger goal, though his 5.6% shooting rate suggests he's due some regression upward. For the Rangers, Adam Sykora generates 0.91 xG/60 across 3 goals and 1 assist with a 20.0% conversion rate—an unsustainably high clip. Gabe Perreault lags at 0.79 xG/60 but has accumulated 8 goals and 11 assists with 2 high-danger chances and a 13.1% shooting percentage.

Mammoth's defense shows structural weakness, with Maveric Lamoureux as the liability. The Rangers' equivalent weakness is Vincent Iorio. Both teams sit at 0% high-danger and 0% rebound goal rate, suggesting either a data issue or disciplined positioning—either way, one opportunistic goal changes everything.

This is a game that lives on the margin—personnel quality tilts Mammoth's way, but environmental variance is enormous at this scoring range.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

UTA
Dylan Guenther28G 15A
1.02 xG/60 · 3 HD · 16.8% sh
Daniil But2G 2A
1.01 xG/60 · 1 HD · 5.6% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters