Islanders shut out the Devils, 9-0
The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.23–2.52 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The Islanders won by 9 goals while being outshot in expected goals 2.52–4.23. The Devils controlled 63% of scoring chances at 5v5 and still lost 9-0—a goaltending heist where elite execution on one end met catastrophic failure on the other.
New York generated 0.074 xG per shot versus New Jersey's 0.052, turning volume disadvantage into precision. The Islanders took 24 shots; the Devils 44. On high-danger chances, the gap was starker—3 for New York, 5 for New Jersey—yet the scoreboard inverted. I. Sorokin made all 44 saves, stopping 4.23 goals above expected. J. Markstrom surrendered 6.48 goals beyond model, including five from low-danger spots where an NHL goalie must have those.
The finishing gap was the real story. New Jersey created 7 rebound opportunities and converted zero. New York scored 8 goals on 20 rush chances. Casey Cizikas's snap shot from the high slot (P3, 19:02) was the turning point—the moment when New York's efficiency overwhelmed New Jersey's volume.
The three stars belonged entirely to New York:
- #11 A. Duclair (NYI) — 3G, 2A in 13:41
- #77 T. DeAngelo (NYI) — 1G, 2A in 20:37
- #13 M. Barzal (NYI) — 1G, 2A in 17:24
Sorokin's perfect night and Duclair's three-goal performance won't repeat. But the gap between New Jersey's 4.23 xG and zero goals requires both sides to cooperate—one team playing almost perfectly, the other failing at the most basic level.
The danger ladder
NYI went 5-for-21 from low danger on 0.42 expected goals — 4.6 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
NJD finished -4.2 against expected, NYI +6.5 — J. Markstrom (NJD) allowed 6.5 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 0-for-35, NYI 5-for-9. NYI scored 8 of theirs off the rush.
- NYI won despite being outplayed by xG (37%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
- I. Sorokin (NYI) stopped 4.2 goals above expected.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) gave up 6.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- NYI generated far more dangerous chances — 0.074 xG/shot vs 0.052. Quality over quantity.
- NJD couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- NYI scored 5 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- NYI was lethal off the rush — 8 goals on 20 rush chances.
- NJD created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- NYI outperformed their expected goals by 6.5 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
- NJD underperformed xG by 4.2 — wasted quality chances.
- I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 4.2 goals above expected — stole the show.